1 / 70

Councillor Induction Day

Municipal Association of Victoria. Councillor Induction Day. 15 November 2012. Welcome Rob Spence CEO, Municipal Association of Victoria. Getting started – what you need to know Rob Spence CEO, Municipal Association of Victoria. Governance, accountability & reputation Alison Lyon

violet-best
Download Presentation

Councillor Induction Day

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Municipal Association of Victoria Councillor Induction Day 15 November 2012

  2. Welcome Rob Spence CEO, Municipal Association of Victoria

  3. Getting started – what you need to know Rob Spence CEO, Municipal Association of Victoria

  4. Governance, accountability & reputation Alison Lyon Deputy CEO and General Counsel, Municipal Association of Victoria

  5. Contact details Alison Lyon (03) 9667 5522 alyon@mav.asn.au

  6. Morning tea

  7. Understanding planning • Liz Johnstone • Executive Officer, Planning Institute Australia

  8. This Presentation • What is Planning? • Councillors roles • Current operating environment, challenges and opportunities • How to be effective & what to look out for

  9. About PIA • National professional body for planners • Professional disciplines of • Urban & Regional Planning Urban Design • Social Planning Environmental Planning • Economic Planning Transport Planning • Planning Law • Professional Development, CPP • Policy and Advocacy • Publications – e-news and monthly Journals • Events

  10. Planning • Regulates the use and development of land, and provides clear processes to manage change • The Planning and Environment Act (1987) • Toolkit: VPP, zones, overlays, policies & codes • Balances private & public interests for a ‘net community benefit” • Performance based, future focussed, • Open, transparent and fair – lots of checks & balances • At times frustrating, time consuming and unrewarding…..

  11. Roles • “Responsible Planning Authority” • Planning Authority: Future focus - Scheme; Policy; Amendments; MSS & Local Policy • Responsible Authority: Permits; compliance and enforcement • Role clarity – tensions with being an advocate, leader, representative, and decision maker.

  12. Context • Operating environment - Complex, costly & controversial • Challenges • Policy: macro (employment, affordable living, sustainability) and micro (neighbourhood character, tree retention) • Resourcing: technical and financial • Opportunities • Metro Strategy(MPS), Regional Growth plans. • Reform: zones, VicSmart, STEP, • Working as a council and as a sector

  13. Being Effective • Reputation matters • Be clear and be consistent, be strategic – take the time to ensure you understand each other and staff understand you early • Think about how you want to use your time • Take advice, ask questions and listen “stand by your plan” or work to change it • Be careful about what you say • Conflict / perceived conflict of interest & bias

  14. MAV planning programs & activities • Gareth Hately & Michelle Croughan • Planning Project Officers, Municipal Association of Victoria

  15. MAV and land use planning… • Metropolitan strategy • Regional growth planning • Hazards – fire/flood • Planning reform and advocacy • Planning system reform – initial report of the Victorian Planning System Ministerial Advisory Committee • Developer contributions – Standard Development Contributions Advisory Committee report • Reformed zones for Victoria – Ministerial Advisory Committee Report

  16. Key planning projects and programs • STEP Planning program • Metropolitan Planning Reference Group • How to manage small rural lots through the planning scheme • Planning enforcement – risk assessment model • Growing efficiently – understanding the cost of different settlement types

  17. Staying informed and opportunities to get involved • Land use planning bulletins • Rural land use planning forums • Rural & regional planning conference • MAV planning committee

  18. Contact details Gareth Hately 9667 5596 or ghately@mav.asn.au Michelle Croughan 9667 5541 or mcroughan@mav.asn.au

  19. Emergency management • Russell Rees • Risk Advisor, Municipal Association of Victoria

  20. The last few years in emergency management in Victoria

  21. The next few years in emergency management in Victoria THE WHITE PAPER !

  22. The problem of emergency management in local government • The legislation is out of date • Everyone thinks we have lots of resources • Everyone treats us like a joined up state based emergency response agency • We don’t always play to our strengths • We don’t always work together as well as we should • We don’t always speak with one voice

  23. So what are we saying generally (apart from waiting for the White Paper) Some key principles: • Resilience not dependency • Three tiers of planning (maybe four) • All agencies • All hazards

  24. MAV’s improvement program for emergency management • Six interlinked projects • Policy and role • Legislation • Funding • Capability building • Roles of Mayors, Councillors and CEO’s • Sharing services • Measuring performance

  25. The role of Councillors and Mayors in emergency management • What to expect at the council table: • Emergency management plans for endorsement • Neighbourhood Safer Place designations • Planning and building issues • Facilities and critical infrastructure • Detailed reports on recovery planning and implementation • Media management issues

  26. The role of Councillors and Mayors in emergency management • Some watch outs! • Councillors have no operational role – you are not Rudi Giuliani! • Need to work to support the community, bring issues to the table • Work with the Mayor and CEO – be an advocate • Stay away from operational areas • Be careful of having a conflict of interest • Provide pastoral support and ensure it is provided

  27. Sometimes we doubt that we can actually achieve

  28. Professional development • Andrew Rowe • Councillor Development Officer, Municipal Association of Victoria

  29. Lunch

  30. Municipal Association of Victoria Councillor Induction Day 15 November 2012 Video

  31. Finance, funding & rates • Owen Harvey-Beavis • Manager Research & Strategy, Municipal Association of Victoria

  32. Overview • Council revenue sources • Valuations and rates • Financial pressures • Financial management • Audit committees

  33. Council revenue Victorian local government recurrent revenue in 2010-11 was $6.6 billion: • $3.71 billion or 56 per cent in rates • $1.14 billion or 17 per cent in fees, fines and charges • $591 million or 9 per cent in specific purpose grants • $489 million or 7 per cent in general purpose grants • $681 million or 10 per cent from other sources Local government collects 3.5 cents of every $1 raised in Australian taxes. The Commonwealth collects 80.3% (including GST 14%) and the States 16.2% of total taxation revenue.

  34. What are council rates? • A property tax that uses property values as the basis for calculating how much each property owner pays • Can comprise up to three components: • Municipal charge (not more than 20% of total rate revenue) • Waste management (garbage) charge • General rate based on the ‘rate in the dollar’ • Councils can strike differential rates • Exemptions apply to crown land, charitable land, land used for religious purposes, land used exclusively for mining or forestry • Primary reason for rates is to raise revenue to fund local government services and infrastructure for public benefit • All property owners pay a share of rates regardless of their choice to use/not use council services, programs, infrastructure

  35. Rating process • Draft budget: • Sets priorities to meet Council Plan objectives • Identify asset maintenance and service funding needs • Estimate revenue to be collected from other sources • Identify amount of rates needed to meet financial responsibilities for coming year • Advertise and open for public comment for at least 14 days • Setting rates: • Determine any municipal and waste charges • Determine rate in the dollar (balance of required revenue by the total value of all properties in the municipality) • Individual property rates: multiply rate in the dollar by the value of a property, add any municipal and waste charges

  36. Rates example • Total income identified in Council Budget: $70 million • Other revenue (funding, grants, fees, fines): $30 million • Rate revenue needed: $40 million • $40 million  $12 billion (value of all rateable properties in the municipality) = $0.0033 (rate in the dollar) • $ Value of property x $ rate in the dollar = $ rates payable • Eg. $550,000 x 0.0033 = $1,815

  37. Valuation process • 2.5 million properties in Victoria valued at more than $1 trillion • Council valuers review property values every two years • Last valued on 1 January 2012 • Total value of all properties in a municipality is used to strike the ‘rate in the dollar’ • Up-to-date revaluations are critical to ensure property owners pay a fair and equitable share of rates • Ratepayers have a right under the Valuation of Land Act 1960 to object to a valuation

  38. Valuation process cont. • Only qualified valuers can perform municipal valuations • Amount a property would sell for on a set date (1 Jan 2012) • Assess market movements and recent sales/rental trends • Highest and best use of the property • Build profile of value levels for different areas/property types • Physical inspection of a sample of properties • Complex statistical models apply information to individual properties • Valuer general certifies council valuations met required standards • Minister declares the valuations suitable to be adopted and used • The same valuations are used for State land tax

  39. Facts and myths MYTH • Increased (or decreased) property values increase (or decrease) how much a council collects – NO (but YES for State land taxes) • Valuations change the total rates collected – NO FACT • Valuations are “revenue neutral” • Council budget is set first and determines total amount of rates to be collected • Valuations are used to apportion how the burden (the total revenue to be raised) will be shared by each ratepayer • Rate in the dollar x property value = rates payable

  40. Property revaluations Size of the pie = Council revenue to be collected (determined by budget) Slice of pie = amount each ratepayer will pay (based on value of their property) A change in property values can change the slice (amount you pay), but not the size of the pie (overall amount council collects)

  41. Revaluation example House 1-$650,000 House 1-$620,000 House 2 -$460,000 House 2 -$460,000 Unit-$370,000 Unit-$360,000 Farm-$800,000 Farm-$820,000 Business-$670,000 Business-$770,000 Property Value - $3,030,000 Rates required - $5,500 Rates required - $5,500 Rate in the Dollar Rate in the Dollar 2012 2011 Property Value - $2,950,000

  42. 2011-12 Rates: House 1: $1212 House 2: $858 Unit: $690 Farm: $1492 Business: $1249 Total: $5,500 2012-13 Rates: House 1: $1,125 (-7.1%) House 2: $835 (-2.6%) Unit: $653 (-5.3%) Farm: $1,488 (-0.2%) Business: $1,398 (11.9%) Total $5,500 (0%) Revaluation example cont. • But, what happens when councils also increase the amount of rates they collect? • Suppose the council increased the amount of rates from $5,500 to $5,800 (increase of 5.5%)

  43. Revaluation example House 1-$650,000 House 1-$620,000 House 2 -$460,000 House 2 -$460,000 Unit-$370,000 Unit-$360,000 Farm-$800,000 Farm-$820,000 Business-$670,000 Business-$770,000 Property Value - $3,030,000 Rates required - $5,500 Rates required - $5,800 Rate in the Dollar Rate in the Dollar 2011 2012 Property Value - $2,950,000

  44. Revaluation example cont.

  45. LG cost pressures • Intergovernmental funding – declining • Councils’ growth in costs – LG Cost Index, not CPI • Asset management – funding the infrastructure renewal gap • Defined benefit superannuation

  46. Intergovernmental funding • GST was implemented in 1999 - Australian Parliament rejected that states should fund local government through GST • Responsibility remains at the federal level • Financial Assistance Grants to local government have declined from 1.2 per cent in 1993-94 to 0.62 per cent of Commonwealth revenue in 2011-12 • Funding indexed by CPI & population (not real costs growth) • Gap in state and federal funding for home and community care, kindergartens, school crossings, public library services • Shortfall is either paid for by ratepayers, service cuts and/or reduced asset maintenance/renewal spending

  47. LG Cost Index • Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures household goods & services • LG Cost Index measures costs to deliver council goods & services • Staff costs are the main driver as most services are delivered by people to the community • Second largest expense is asset maintenance and construction inc. staff/contractors and materials • LG Cost Index is determined using: • Average Weekly Earnings (AWE) Index • Engineering Construction Index • LG Cost Index has averaged 4% over the 5 years to 2011-12 and was estimated at 3.9% for 2012-13.

  48. Asset management – structural adjustment • Local government is capital intensive • $60 billion in assets - level of government that spends the highest proportion of its revenue on infrastructure • Adoption of accrual accounting (mid 90s) - councils explicitly recognise deteriorationof their assets for the first time • At the same time, rate capping and rate cuts led to councils spending less on ageing infrastructure • Rate increases in excess of the LG Cost Index help to close the ‘asset renewal gap’ – that is, assets declining faster than councils can fund their renewal costs

  49. Asset renewal gap challenges • 2002: Auditor General says renewal backlog is $1.5 - $2.7 billion • 2007: MAV Step Asset Program identified an annual underspend of $280 million • Equivalent to annual av. 12% rate rise for next five years • 2010: councils reduced their annual infrastructure renewal shortfall to $100 million • Achieved through better data collection; increased funding (rates and borrowings); and asset rationalisation • Further investment still needed by councils to continue reducing the asset renewal gap • Deferred spending = higher costs for future ratepayers

  50. Defined Benefit Superannuation • $400 million call due 1 July 2013 • Established an MAV Taskforce which will make recommendations in early 2013 • Recommendations likely to include: • Access to borrowings • Changes to information and advice provided by Vision Super to employers • Potential options to reduce the risk of future calls

More Related