1 / 18

802-11 PAR Review – July 2014

802-11 PAR Review – July 2014. Authors:. Date: 2014-07-15. Abstract. Review of the PARS for consideration for July 2014. http:// grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/PARs.shtml. 2.3 II PARs for review this week.

vito
Download Presentation

802-11 PAR Review – July 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802-11 PAR Review – July 2014 Authors: • Date:2014-07-15 Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  2. Abstract • Review of the PARS for consideration for July 2014. • http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/PARs.shtml Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  3. 2.3 II PARs for review this week • 802.1ARce - Secure Device Identity, Amendment 1: Amendment 1: SHA-384 and P-384 Elliptic Curve, PAR and CSD • 802.1AEcg - Media Access Control (MAC) Security - Amendment: Ethernet Data Encryption devices, PAR and CSD • 802.3bv- amendment, 1000 Mb/s Operation Over Plastic Optical Fiber , PAR and CSD • 802.3bw - amendment, 1 Twisted Pair 100 Mb/s Ethernet , PAR and CSD • 802.11ah, Sub 1 GHz, PAR extension request, PAR and CSD • 802.11ai, Fast initial link setup, PAR extension request , PAR and 5C (grandfathered) • 802.15.4, amendment enabling Spectrum Resource Measurement Capability, PAR and CSD • 802.22.3, Specifying Spectrum Occupancy Sensing (SOS) Measurement Devices and Means that Enable Coalescing the Results from Multiple Such Devices, PAR and CSD Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  4. 802.24 Charter Change • In the proposed process for creating Task Groups (TGs) under 802.24, a proposed TG scope document is circulated 30 days in advance of a plenary to solicit comments from the WGs.  According to the proposed process, this follows the PAR process in that comments are due by 5 pm Tuesday of the plenary week and responses are due by 5 pm on Wednesday.The 802.24 Smart Grid TAG approved a TG scope document for a Smart Grid TG, 24-14-0015-01-0000-Smart-Grid-TG-Scope.pdf, which can be found at:https://mentor.ieee.org/802.24/dcn/14/24-14-0015-01-0000-smart-grid-tg-scope.pdf Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  5. Jon Rosdahl, CSR Comments from 802.11 PAR AdHoc Committee Comments for July 2014 PARS for consideration.

  6. 802.1ARce - Secure Device Identity, Amendment 1: Amendment 1: SHA-384 and P-384 Elliptic Curve, PAR and CSD • 1. Expand Acronyms for first usage in Scope/Title/Purpose. “SHA-384, P-384, ECDSA” Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  7. 802.1AEcg - Media Access Control (MAC) Security - Amendment: Ethernet Data Encryption devices, PAR • 4.1 and 4.2: Check the Start of Sponsor Ballot and the Submission to RevCom dates…They do not seem reasonable. • Note that the dates that are listed seem to be close to date that a new revision is needed. Have you considered just getting this amendment done in conjunction with a Revision PAR? • 5.5 Change “separate bridging systems (Ethernet Data Encryption devices, EDEs) “ to separate bridging systems, Ethernet Data Encryption devices, (EDEs) • 8.1 Add the full name of the 802.1AE, 802.1X, and 802.1Q standards. • 8.1: Where is “#7.3”? This comment may be a hold over, or miss labeled. • 5.6 – consider making the Stakeholders: Developers and users of secure networking equipment. Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  8. 802.1AEcg - Media Access Control (MAC) Security - Amendment: Ethernet Data Encryption devices, CSD • 1.2 Broad Market Potential: “…number of significant users…” what number? Who are these significant users? • 1.2.2/1.2.3 missing “Std” on several of the standards cited. • 1.2.5 change “802.1AE-2006” to “IEEE Std 802.1AE-2006” • Please check in the CSD for other instances of missing proper citation. Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  9. 802.3bv- amendment, 1000 Mb/s Operation Over Plastic Optical Fiber , PAR • 5.6 change Stakeholder list: “Stakeholders identified to date include but are not limited to: user…s” to “Users…” • 7.1 expand the acronym “VDE”… (not sure what VDE is). • 7.1 From the 802.3 CSD – “There are standardized specifications for data transmission over POF…leveraging those…” need to indentify the “other” standards that are similar that make up “those”. • 8.1 suggest a bit of explanation on what is being stated… • “. Its specifications” is this the VDE Document? • Is the withdrawn standard being incorporated into this amendment? Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  10. 802.3bv- amendment, 1000 Mb/s Operation Over Plastic Optical Fiber , CSD • From the title page • “The following are the CSD Responses in relation to the IEEE P802.3xx PAR” • this seems a bit Generic..Was the correct CSD provided? Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  11. 802.3bw - amendment, 1 Twisted Pair 100 Mb/s Ethernet , PAR and CSD • No Comment Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  12. 802.11ah, Sub 1 GHz, PAR extension request, PAR and CSD • No comment Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  13. 802.11ai, Fast initial link setup, PAR extension request , PAR and 5C (grandfathered) • No comment Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  14. 802.15.4, amendment enabling Spectrum Resource Measurement Capability, PAR and CSD • 1.3.4 b) needs a response: • b)Proven similar technology via testing, modeling, simulation, etc. Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  15. 802.22.3, Specifying Spectrum Occupancy Sensing (SOS) Measurement Devices and Means that Enable Coalescing the Results from Multiple Such Devices, PAR and CSD • 2.1 Title – Consider that “SOS” is a internationally recognized acronym for emergency requests. Consider changing or eliminating the acronym… • 5.2 The Scope should not talk about the “project”, but rather describe the document that will be created. Please remove project specific definitions and instead describe what the standard will be defining. • 5.2 “initially” defines? The Standard will have a set definition that as far as this revision is concerned is the only one that will exist. Do not describe or promise future enhancements. • 8.1 is for extra explanation for identified clauses. The clause id is not included. Generally a history is not included in 8.1 • CSD: 1.2.2 – Cite standards correctly. • CSD: Seems the History is repeated for several responses. • CSD: Seems overly verbose Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  16. 802.24 Charter Change • In the proposed process for creating Task Groups (TGs) under 802.24, a proposed TG scope document is circulated 30 days in advance of a plenary to solicit comments from the WGs.  According to the proposed process, this follows the PAR process in that comments are due by 5 pm Tuesday of the plenary week and responses are due by 5 pm on Wednesday.The 802.24 Smart Grid TAG approved a TG scope document for a Smart Grid TG, 24-14-0015-01-0000-Smart-Grid-TG-Scope.pdf, which can be found at:https://mentor.ieee.org/802.24/dcn/14/24-14-0015-01-0000-smart-grid-tg-scope.pdf Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  17. 802.24 Comments • Concern: • Not seen large numbers interested in attending 802.24 • If we are creating White papers instead of Standards, then are we needing to create a new process. • Can the Industry Connection be a process that is sufficient rather than change 802.24? Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  18. References Jon Rosdahl, CSR

More Related