1 / 13

Team Cognitive Training

Team Cognitive Training. Improving Quantitative Reasoning by Training Visuo -spatial Working Memory. US students are underperforming So. Working Memory. Apply knowledge using general fluid intelligence ( gF ) to solve problems gF = short-term memory + working memory (WM)

viveca
Download Presentation

Team Cognitive Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Team Cognitive Training

  2. Improving Quantitative Reasoning by Training Visuo-spatial Working Memory • US students are underperforming • So...

  3. Working Memory • Apply knowledge using general fluid intelligence (gF) to solve problems • gF = short-term memory + working memory (WM) • WM = ability to maintain and manipulate information WM Long-term memory

  4. Visuo-Spatial WM • WM = visuo-spatial + auditory + central executive • Visuo-spatial WM  math skills • Train visuo-spatial WM to improve quantitative reasoning

  5. Hypothesis 1:Cognitive Ability  Quantitative Reasoning

  6. Hypothesis 2:Cognitive Ability Can Be Trained • Plastic quality of the brain • Cognitive ability can be trained • Training transfer

  7. Hypothesis 3:Quantitative Reasoning Can Be Improved Through Cognitive Training

  8. Methodology • Recruit Participants • Pre-Test • Training (ABST) • Post-Test • Analysis

  9. Adaptive Block Span Task

  10. Drawbacks/Limitations • ABST training relies on participants • Testing is time consuming • Levels of education • Participant’s testing ability • Time of day

  11. Pre and Post-tests • Response Inhibition • Working Memory • Perceptual Speed • Reading Comprehension • Math Ability

  12. Timeline Spring 2009 • Thesis Proposal • IRB Approval • Grant Application • Lit Review • Fall 2009 • Recruit Participants • Data Collection • Lit Review • Spring 2010 • Finish Data Collection • Data Analysis • Write Thesis • Lit Review • Fall 2010 • Write Thesis • Lit Review • Spring 2011 • Edit Thesis • Lit Review

  13. Budget • Participants: 50 – 100 • $20 per participants • $1000 min. • $2000 max. • $450 for rewards • $500 for flash drives

More Related