220 likes | 374 Views
Measure by Measure: Composing and Rehearsing a Campus-wide IL Rubric. Jim Kinnie , Mary C. MacDonald and Elaine Finan. Project funded by: Davis Educational Foundation, 2010 Wabash 2.0 Study. Introduction. Scope of IL on URI Campus Library IL Programs; scaffolded & incremental
E N D
Measure by Measure:Composing and Rehearsing a Campus-wide IL Rubric Jim Kinnie, Mary C. MacDonald and Elaine Finan Project funded by: Davis Educational Foundation, 2010 Wabash 2.0 Study
Introduction • Scope of IL on URI Campus • Library IL Programs; scaffolded & incremental • Academic Majors w/SLOs of Information Literacy focus • Curricular Framework: • URI outcomes: Think critically, independently, take initiative based on informed choices. • Gen Ed Information Literacy student learning outcome
Introduction • “Are URI students achieving information literacy • competency over the span of an • undergraduate program?”
Take-Aways At the end of this session, you will learn how to: Adopt a model for building faculty collaboration around assessment Adapt a process that is transferable and expandable Identify opportunities for applying an information literacy (IL) rubric and engage multiple disciplines
Overview Composing Rehearsing Measuring “Are URI students achieving information literacy competency over the span of their undergraduate program?”
Composing Create a shared understanding before measuring for student learning ACRL Five IL Standards: • Determine information needs • Access needed information • Evaluate information sources • Use information to accomplish a specific purpose • Use information legally American Association of Colleges & Universities IL VALUE rubric framework
Composing Rubric composition 2008-2012 Preparation: Campus wide rubric workshop – 3 librarians Library faculty, subject faculty, national expert, SLOAA Librarians, SLOAA, IDP Developmental scale for IL Competency Beginning, Approaching, Competent
Let’s Collaborate! *Adapted from the AAC&U VALUE rubric
Rehearsing • Created a URI-Librarian approved IL rubric • Pilot – 2 phases • “Library-Friendly” Faculty from 4 of 7 colleges • History, Sociology, Public Relation, Writing & Rhetoric, Business, Pharmacy, Library (undergraduate), and Natural Resources Science • 442 students evaluated – at least one element • Instructors mapped rubric elements to assignments • Applied rubric to student work http://www.uri.edu/assessment/uri/guidance/documents/URI_IL_Rubric.pdf
Measuring Combined Results F2011, S2012
Measuring Combined Results F2011, S2012 No IL courses
Next Steps Expand project into assessment of IL as a general education learning outcome. Replicate assessment process to evaluate other student learning outcomes. Continue collaboration and assessment across disciplines
References American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2013). VALUE: Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education. Retrieved from www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/ April 22, 2013. American Library Association. (2006). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency April 22, 2013. University of Rhode Island. (2012). University Catalog 2012. Retrieved from http://web.uri.edu/catalog/student-learning-outcomes/ April 18, 2013. University of Rhode Island. (2013). General Education Application - Integrated Skills. Retrieved from http://www.uri.edu/facsen/gen_app/skills.html April 18, 2013. University of Rhode Island Libraries. (2006). Mission Statement. Retrieved from http://www.uri.edu/library/univlibs/mission.html April 21, 2013.