1 / 17

Carbon Markets: A Potential Source of Income to Farmers

Carbon Markets: A Potential Source of Income to Farmers. Southern Region Agricultural Outlook Conference September 23, 2008 Luis A. Ribera Assistant Professor & Extension Economist. Carbon Sequestration.

vivien
Download Presentation

Carbon Markets: A Potential Source of Income to Farmers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Carbon Markets: A Potential Source of Income to Farmers Southern Region Agricultural Outlook Conference September 23, 2008 Luis A. Ribera Assistant Professor & Extension Economist

  2. Carbon Sequestration • Carbon sequestration can be defined as the capture and secure storage of carbon that would otherwise be emitted to or remain in the atmosphere. • What are Carbon Credits? Two ideas: • Prevention/reduction of carbon emissions produced by human activities from reaching the atmosphere by capturing and diverting them to secure storage. • Removal of carbon from the atmosphere by various means and securely storing it.

  3. Agriculture’s Role… • It is estimated that U.S. agriculture could sequester 275 - 900 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. • Dr. Richard Sandor (CCX Founder) estimated future value of agricultural offsets at up to $20 Billion annually • Agriculture could be the “bridge” to climate stabilization in the coming years at a much cheaper cost than some of the big technology ideas like underground or ocean storage.

  4. Chicago Climate Exchange - CCX • The CCX was launched in 2003 • Trading operation that is based on a voluntary, but legally binding association of a number of emitters and offset suppliers. • The commodity traded at the CCX is the Carbon Financial Instrument (CFI), each of which represents 100 tonnes of CO2e. • The volume traded on the CCX in the first quarter of 2008 was about 25 million tonnes of CO2e or annually around 100 million tonnes.

  5. CCX – Carbon Financial Instrument

  6. Price forecasts for US carbon credits

  7. Chicago Climate Exchange - CCX • Four types of eligible offset projects • Soil Offsets • Rangeland Offsets • Forestry Offsets • Methane Offsets

  8. CCX – Conservation Tillage • Conservation Tillage • Minimum contract size 10,000 tonnes from a group of farms so need around 20,000 acres • Aggregator is like the county elevator • Minimum 5 yr commitment of min till – no history • At least 2/3 of soil undisturbed and at least 2/3 of residue on the soil surface must remain • Farms must have at least 250 acres • No commitment after contract expires • Cropland converted to permanent grass (after Jan 1, 1999.)

  9. CCX – Conservation Tillage

  10. CCX – Permanent Grassland

  11. CCX - Rangeland • Rangeland • Non degraded rangeland to increase CO2 sequestration through grazing land management • Follow NRCS Guidelines on stocking rates and managing harvest of vegetation with grazing animals • Restoration of previously degraded rangeland • Must take place on rangeland with avg. rain between 14” to 40”

  12. CCX – Rangeland Management

  13. Example on Cons. Tillage Contract (2,500 ac) • Assumptions: • Rate of Absorption: 0.4 Mton/Year • Price $6/Mton/Year • Aggregator Charge: 10% of market price • Verification Fee: $0.12/credit • Registration Fee: $0.15/credit • Trading Fee: $0.05/credit • Retention: 20% of total offset each year • Sources: • http://www.chicagoclimatex.com/ • http://www.agragate.com/

  14. Example on Cons. Tillage Contract (2,500 ac)

  15. Sensitivity Analysis

  16. Bottom Line • Not enough money to make producers get on board • Expectations on EPA regulations • Will the US join Kyoto protocol? • What will the next government do? • First adopter problem • Paper: http://www.afpc.tamu.edu/

More Related