270 likes | 387 Views
Mainline Service and Pricing Settlement Presentation to the TTF April 6, 2001. Background. April 2000 Five year price cap proposal TransCanada shares in non-renewal risk Discretion on pricing & term July 2000 Five year price cap with some flow through Asymmetrical risk sharing
E N D
Mainline Service and Pricing Settlement Presentation to the TTF April 6, 2001
Background • April 2000 • Five year price cap proposal • TransCanada shares in non-renewal risk • Discretion on pricing & term • July 2000 • Five year price cap with some flow through • Asymmetrical risk sharing • Discretion on short term pricing • August/December 2000 • Continued discussions around risk and discretion
Background • December 2000 • Determined parties too far apart on cost of capital • Decision to litigate cost of capital & negotiate two year settlement that would include: • COS elements other than ROE and Equity • Billing determinants • IT & STFT service and pricing • FT enhancements • New services • Incentives
Benefits of the Settlement • Evolution towards competitive environment • Avoid / Limit litigation • Incentive for TransCanada to cut costs and improve efficiency • Alignment on incentives for win/win • AOS and Make-up add value to FT • Migration from FT to IT may be reduced
Details of TransCanada PipeLines Services & Pricing Settlementfor 2001 & 2002
Settlement Review • Financial Components • John Lee • Revenue Requirement, Severance, Merger Benefit, Depreciation, Incentive Programs • Services • Steve Emond • FT Makeup, Authorized Overrun Service, IT Floor Price, New Services Expedited Approval, Turnback
Net Revenue Requirement (Article 4) • OM&A (Article 4.3) Amount set at: - 2001: $223 million - 2002: $217 million • Flow-Through Costs (Article 4.2) - forecast for each year of the Settlement - variances between actual and forecast costs flowed through subject to review (Article 17.4)
Net Revenue Requirement Continued (Article 4) • Miscellaneous Revenue (Article 4.4) • Discretionary and Non-Discretionary Revenue forecast for each year of the Settlement - Variances between actual and forecast revenues flowed through subject to review (Article 17.4)
Severance Program (Article 5) • Provides TCPL with incentive to reduce costs and share in benefits achieved • Provides shippers with immediate savings during the term through the sharing mechanism and sustained savings beyond the term • Mechanism • Severance costs in 2001 and 2002 amortized over three years • Cost savings determined from the date of termination • Severance benefits equal amortized costs less savings • Severance benefits shared 70% TCPL: 30% Shippers • Illustrative example in Schedule F
Merger Agreement – 2001 Benefit (Article 6) • Recognition of sharing OM&A cost savings under Section 9 of the MCBA in 2001 • Savings determination • If 2001 Actual OM&A (adjusted) < Actual 2000 OM&A the savings are shared 50/50 TCPL/Shippers • Actual 2001 OM&A adjusted for non-routine costs • Example shown in Schedule 13.0 of Schedule “D” Reporting Requirements
Depreciation Expense (Article 7) • Negotiated rate increases for the term as follows: 2000 Composite - 2.64% 2001: 2000 Composite Rate + .10 2002: 2001 Composite Rate + .15
Incentives • Revenue / Asset Management (Article 9) • Fuel Gas & Power Incentive (Article 10.1) • Foreign Exchange Management Program (Article 10.2) • Interest Rate Management Program (Article 10.3)
Revenue / Asset Management (Article 9) • Purpose - minimize TBO/Storage costs - generate incremental transportation & other revenue • Commission accrues to TCPL on total revenues and cost savings based on percentages defined in Article 9 • TCPL Commission capped at $5 million in each year of term • Revenues and cost savings net of the cap flow back to shippers
Foreign Exchange & Interest Rate Programs (Articles 10.2 & 10.3) • Purpose - minimize foreign exchange and interest cost • Program savings/(losses) are shared 50/50 • Continuation of programs implemented in the Incentive Settlement and carried forward in 2000 • Details of program are unchanged and fully described in Articles 10.2 and 10.3
Contract Demand • Variance between forecast and actual deferred and recovered in following year through a deferral account
Article 11.1: FT Make-up and AOS Article 11.2: IT Floor Price Article 11.3: New Service Expedited Approval Process Article 12: Turnback Procedure Services
FT Service Enhancements - Description • FT Make-Up • Unutilized FT capacity • Authorized Overrun Service (AOS) • 4% of FT demand toll • Dollar credit to IT invoice • Credits expire if not used in the gas month
FT Service Enhancements - Details • Start: • minimum of 30 days after NEB approval • first day of a month • End: • December 31, 2002 • Tariff Changes in Schedule “B”
FT Service Enhancements - Benefits of IT Credit Process • flexibility and value: • use anytime during the month • use on any path • relatively quick & inexpensive to implement • simple to use • consistent with FT Make-up process on NOVA • no incremental toll
IT Floor Price • IT is Biddable (status quo) • Floor Price = Proxy for marginal fuel cost + Contribution to fixed costs + FT commodity toll • Maximum Floor Price: 120% of FT Toll • Minimum Floor Price: 80% of FT Toll
IT Floor Price - Fuel Proxy • Consistent with historical methodology….. • Uses long-haul IT to Parkway as basis • Difference between marginal fuel % and average fuel % • Changes from historical methodology….. • Revised monthly to reflect cost of gas at Empress • Revised seasonally to reflect changes in fuel ratios
IT Floor Price - other • contribution to fixed costs = 4% of FT Demand toll currently in effect • changes commence: • minimum of 30 days after NEB approval • 1st day of a month
IT Floor Price - Schedules C-1: Tariff Amendments C-2: Fixed Cost Contribution C-3: Example of monthly Calculation C-4: Seasonal redetermination Process C-5: Format of “List of Tolls”
Future Business Model • TransCanada will develop new regulatory model by the end of August 2001 • Discussions with Stakeholders Start: by September 17, 2001 Finish: by February 28, 2002 • File: April 2002 • Implement: January 1, 2003
Eastern Zone Toll ($/GJ) • 2000 $1.01 • 2001 Interim $1.13 • 2001 Settlement $1.103 * (* based on current cost of capital under NEB Formula)
Next Steps Target Date Complete MOU April File MOU April File Cost of Capital April NEB Decision - MOU May - Oct. * FT Enhancements in Effect July - Dec. * NEB Decision: Cost of Capital Sept/Oct & Final Tolls *Range depends on objections by parties