340 likes | 352 Views
This review mission identifies issues related to the integration of monitoring and evaluation systems under the National Rural Health Mission. The Ministry of Health & Family Welfare emphasizes outcomes, impact, and convergence, with a focus on performance, physical, and financial monitoring. Challenges include data provider burden, data consistency and reliability, and lack of involvement and ownership. The Ministry aims to address these challenges through technology solutions, infrastructural strengthening, and improving the quality and use of data.
E N D
Ministry of Health & Family WelfareMonitoring & Evaluation (M&E)under National Rural Health Mission Issues for Third Common Review Mission, 3rd November, 2009
National Rural Health Mission Integration of Health Care delivery systems … necessitating An integration of Monitoring of Information and Evaluation Systems (MIES)
Ministry’s Requirement of Data • Performance Monitoring • Physical Monitoring • Financial Monitoring Emphasis on • Outcomes, Impact, Convergence • Reach - sub-district, community, household • Equity - gender, vulnerable groups • Performance based funding in programs • Now Results Framework Document • Giving quantifiable and measurable goals
Monitoring and Evaluation activities • Health Management Information System (HMIS) • NRHM - operational • NDCPs in pipeline • Surveys • Large scale household surveys – NFHS, DLHS • Annual Health Survey – District Health Profile for 284 Districts • Evaluation • Concurrent Evaluation of NRHM • Regional Evaluation Teams • Population Research Centres • Clearing House for Information
Legacies in Health Information • Similar data sets for various Central Agencies • Respondent Burden on Data Provider • Data load on the system – Manpower x Time matrix • Affects consistency and reliability of information • Lack of involvement and ownership • Delays, integrity, quality aspects etc • Information Flow - an upward bias • Data viewed as a by-product • Increased participation of Private Sector, PPP • Challenge for collecting information • Evaluation systems primarily project based
HMIS Challenges • Integrating/consolidating information needs of various agencies • Rationalising formats for data capture • Reducing frequency of data capture • An evolving and dynamic concept - not static • Technology solutions to reduce manual processes and improve quality of analysis
HMIS Challenges - cont’d • Infrastructural strengthening at the Centre, State and District • Facilitate / motivate data flow • IT readiness of the data reporting machinery in States and Districts
MIES System Model Working Group on M&E Program Planning & Service Delivery Validation Community Monitoring & Triangulation Monitoring Format & guidelines MIES Programme Mgmt Review Launched • Evaluation • Surveys, RETs • Concurrent evaluation Quality Assessment Pilot being expanded
Multi-pronged M&E strategy • Identifying Nodal (M&E) Information Officer at all levels • Structuring the Information flows • Infrastructural strengthening- IT, Networking, Manpower • Improving the quality of information • Earmarking 2-3% of the Budget on M&E • Strengthening evaluation work and improving validation and use of data.
Developments in HMIS ..(1) • Rationalisation of Formats - 2008 • Final Formats sent to States in September, 2008 • Soft copy on MoHFW’s Website • HMIS portal launched on 21st October, 2008 • Web-based Software Application Developed • Dedicated Portal for HMIS http://nrhm-mis.nic.in • All State Prl Secy (HFW) and MD (NRHM) provided with dedicated e-mails
Developments in HMIS ..(2)Data Details in Formats • Monthly: Performance/Service statistics (Form-9, RIMS, Patient Services, Lab Tests, Cause-wise listing of deaths) • Quarterly: Training and NRHM additionalities • Annual: Infrastructure and Manpower • FMRs: Quarterly – to be made monthly
Developments in HMIS ..(3) • Web-based Data capturing system • Physical performance captured at District level (M,Q,A) • Includes District Level FMRs • Facility based performance • Data validation - identifying Probable Outliers, consistency checks • Automatic aggregation, Export facility to Excel • Financial Performance at District level • Standard and Custom Reports • National, State and District Fact Sheets • Key indicators for NRHM and RCH • Discontinuation of paper reports under NRHM
HMIS Portal – Information Available • Customized Reports – Data Item Wise Report • All/Selective Items • Across Periods, Districts, States • Across States/Districts/Sub-Districts and Periods • Periodic Reports/Publication sections being continuously enhanced • DLHS III Reports • MMR Report • NFHS III Factsheet • SRS Bulletin • Time Series data on CBR, CDR, IMR & TFR – India • Demographic Indicators
Modes of Data District Draft Mode
Modes of Data State Draft Mode
Modes of Data State Forward Mode
HMIS – Steps taken • Interaction with State Governments • Provisional Reports for • NRHM and RCH - 2008-09 • NRHM and RCH – Apr-September, 2009 • Discussion on Outliers • Validation Checks • Sensitisation through Workshops and discussions • Training of State and District Users
Road Ahead • Involve State Institutes for training State/District/Sub-District Users on: • Formats and Instructions – physical and financial • Uploading data and checking quality • Generating reports and analysis for local action and onward transmission • Levels of Training • Medical Officers • Data and Finance Officers • Paramedics, ANMs • HMIS R&D Group in these Training Institutes • Feed inputs to Clearing House • Help Desk • Mother (ANC) and Child Immunisation name-based Tracking
Next Steps • Fast Track training to the States, Districts, Blocks • Capitalising on NICNET, DIT and other networks • Propagation of “Using Data for Action” • Regular MIS • Evidence Based Planning (IDHAP) • Expanding HMIS beyond Districts, Helpline, GIS etc
Expectations from State/District Users • Portal provides complete flexibility to authorised Users • Data Discipline & Protocols to be inculcated • Data Capture on time at District level • Prepare Provisional Reports – detect outliers • Recheck and verify data • Forward/Commit Data onto system • District/State Level Necessary for Final Reports
Key issues to be seen by CRM... (1) 1. State/District Level • Have the Nodal Information (M&E) Officers been notified – State/District/Block • Efforts to integrate M&E activities across health programmes (NRHM, RCH, RNTCP, NVBDCP etc) • Do they have Meetings for reviewing progress of Districts, Blocks • Who checks validity (completeness/consistency) of data • State Demographer/ PMU? • Periodicity - Regular/adhoc • Is review analytical or target based • Do they rely on HMIS Portal data or other sources • Frequency of Feedback to Districts/Blocks
Key issues to be seen by CRM... (2) 2. District/Block/Facility level • IT infratructure (manpower, IT eqpmt, connectivity, electricity etc) • Are the HMIS forms available at the block/facility • see last few months data • Is the performance being reviewed at any level – Block upwards 3. State’s Capacity for training for State/ District/Sub-District level users on HMIS
Key issues to be seen by CRM... (3) 4. PIP Preparation for 2010-11 • Budget for M&E Activities • HMIS, Printing of forms, Training • IT enhancement • Quality Assurance, Community Monitoring • Provision for mobility to improve data quality 5. M&E Related queries be sent on hmis-nrhm@nic.in
Thanks Pravin Srivastava Director (Statistics) Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India dirstat-mohfw@nic.in pravin.srivastava@nic.in