140 likes | 155 Views
This opinion highlights the crucial role of metropolitan regions in the post-2020 Cohesion Policy and advocates for greater recognition, support, and collaborative mechanisms to address challenges such as transport, environment, migration, and more. The focus is on reshaping resource allocation beyond GDP indicators, emphasizing urban-rural linkages, and enhancing statistical data collection at the metropolitan level. The text also underscores the need for flexibility in funding allocation and increased support for sustainable urban development to meet the evolving needs of metropolitan regions. The deadline for submitting opinions, discussion, and adoption procedures are outlined to facilitate constructive engagement in shaping the future of metropolitan regions within the Cohesion Policy framework.
E N D
The challenges of metropolitan regions and their positionin the future Cohesion Policy post 2020. Juraj Droba
Main Goals Of The Opinion: 1. A call for a greater recognition of metropolitan regions in the Cohesion Policy post 2020. 3. Stimulate the metropolitan regions to prepare arguments on why they should be supported by the post-2020 Cohesion Policy. 4. Policy recommendations for the preparation of effective collaborative mechanisms. 2. Identification of the main challenges of metropolitan regions.
293 Million... 75%... ...EU residents were living in metropolitan regions in 2016, which means three EU residents out of five. ...EU residents live in urban areas and this figure is expected to reach 80% by 2050.
"METROPOLITAN REGIONS ARE KEY DRIVERS OF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT." 72% OF THE EU GDP IS GENERATED IN METROPOLITAN REGIONS
Challenges I. • Transport • Environment • Social Inclusion • Migration • Digitisation • Shortages of Skilled Labour • New Forms of Mobility • Implementation of a Sustainable Energy Transition • Climate Protection Policy
Challenges II. • Ageing of Population • Homelessness • Crime • In-work Poverty • Affordable Housing
GDP is not enough The method for reallocating resources under the ESIF is based primarily on one indicator – GDP per capita/purchasing power parity – and does not include social, territorial and environmental aspects. "There is a need to explore other indicators that complement GDP when measuring progress." Eurostat
The Recognition... ...of the role of metropolitan regions to the achievement of the Cohesion policy goals is still insufficient. Urban - Rural Linkages The Debate... ....on MRs needs to highlight the significance of well-functioning urban-rural links. The Opportunity... ....to take into account the need for a specific approach to MRs and their functional areas.
Fair recognition of metropolitan regions in the Cohesion Policy post 2020 WHAT DO WE NEED? Involvement of metropolitan regions in the preparation and implementation of the cohesion policy Support the EC proposal to increase flexibility Incentives to support metropolitan cooperation within the European Structural and Investment Funds
WHAT DO WE NEED? Research and statistical data collection at metropolitan area level Support for the proposal to increase to 6% the national allocation for sustainable urban development Contributing to the "beyond GDP" Cooperation among metropolitan regions
24. September 10. - 17. October 23. October 19. - 28. November 4. - 5. December Deadline for submitting the draft opinion to the COTER secretariat Discussion and adoptionof the draft opinion in COTER CoR procedure & timetable Deadline to table Amendments: - For the members amendments - For the rapporteur (Rapporteur's amendments) Deadline to table Amendments: - For the members amendments - For the rapporteur (Rapporteur's amendments) Adoption of the draft opinion in COR plenary
Do you plan to apply for flexibility in the post-2020 CP or, if you are not a representative of an MR, would you see any benefits for other territories of flexibility for MRs in your country? According to forecasts, as much as 80% of the EU’s population will soon be living in urban areas. Are you in favour of more support for cities and functional urban areas, or do you think that they receive sufficient support? Can you envisage increasing support for sustainable urban development up to 10% of the national allocation?
What steps does your metropolitan region take to prepare arguments to justify why investments from the ESIF should be channelled specifically towards your metropolitan region? Is your region involved in any project on an alternative comprehensive measure of development that also takes into account indicators other than purely economic ones? For example, the European Commission pilot project on establishing a Social Progress Index (SPI)?