50 likes | 205 Views
Innovative Capacity Building Presenter: Danielle Darrow de Mora. Introduction & Overview. Local Partners Capacity Building Project (LPCB) Project Dates: May 2008 – June 2013 Location: Zambia, nationwide
E N D
Innovative Capacity BuildingPresenter: Danielle Darrow de Mora
Introduction & Overview Local Partners Capacity Building Project (LPCB) • Project Dates: May 2008 – June 2013 • Location: Zambia, nationwide • Goal: Improve overall capacity of selected local organizations to ensure efficient and effective expansion of their programs so that quality HIV/AIDS services are delivered in Zambia. • Partners: 107 organizations, 3 capacity leaders Enhancing Nigerian Capacity for AIDS Prevention (ENCAP) Project • Project Dates: April 2010 – April 2015 • Location: Nigeria: FCT, Bayelsa, Benue, Ebonyi, Rivers, Taraba • Goal: to facilitate behaviors that will decrease HIV transmission in Bayelsa, Rivers, Benue, Taraba, and Ebonyi states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). • Partners: 25 organizations
Capacity Building Operating Model Continuous OD Repeated assessments and planning
Unique Characteristics of LPCB/ENCAP Model • Sustainability: Develop capabilities and expertise of local Capacity Leader (CL) organizations and individual organization development facilitators (IODF) to become sustainable institutional strengthening service providers for local organizations; strengthen collaboration between partners and government • Active engagement: Annual self assessment tool leads to individualized improvement plan with appropriate goals, fostering ownership and accountability, tracking of progress • Capacitated grant management: Partners trained in OD and HIV technical topics prior to competing for grants; better able to successfully manage grants and implement improved HIV services • Graduation categories: Graduation, Completion, Participation
Critique of the Model Benefits • Real commitment to CB, since grants are not guaranteed • Training prior to funding • Availability of phased funding • Competitive RFA • CB from peers and local resources = sustainability • Opportunity for growth based on performance • Networking and recognition Challenges • Risk of reverting back to original state once funding/partnership ends • Small CBOs vs. intermediate sized organizations or integrated networks • Creation of unsustainable salary/benefit structures and infrastructure • Limited opportunity for technical updates and quality assurance post-partnership • USG specific