130 likes | 139 Views
This article explores the role of International Financial Institutions (IFIs) in development and the need for increased accountability and transparency. It discusses the challenges and contradictions of market-driven development and calls for a more people-centric approach. The article also highlights the need for parliamentary oversight, public participation, and mechanisms for affected communities to seek remedy. It provides examples of conditionalities and the impact of IFIs on the sovereignty of states. Additionally, the article examines the different perspectives and collaborations between government, NGOs, and for-profit providers in delivering public services.
E N D
IFIs as if People Mattered Voice and Mobilisation for Reforms Rashed Al Mahmud Titumir House: 40/A, Road: 10/A, Dhanmondi, Dhaka–1209, Bangladesh Tel: 880-2-815 82 74, Fax: 880-2- 815 9135 E-mail: info@unnayan.org; Website: www.unnayan.org
Neither a borrower nor a lender be;For loan oft loses both itself and friend,And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 3 Development is inherently a normative concept…..To pretend otherwise is just to hide one’s value judgments. Seers 1972:4 Knowing the past and planning the future
Less has become more… • The paradox is that less intervention in theory has meant more intervention in practice. • A brief initial moment of market triumphalism in the early 1980s (get the prices right), it became evident that a few decisive strokes of policy to roll back states and liberate markets was not enough. • Freeing the market escalated into an extraordinarily ambitious, or grandiose, project of social engineering - the pursuit of ‘good governance’ quickly extended to, and embraced, notions of ‘civil society’ and social institutions • The major shifts of development theory, policy discourse and design, and modalities of intervention in the period of neo-liberal ascendancy, spearheaded by the World Bank, scaled up to encompass the reshaping, or transformation, of political and social (and, by implication, cultural) as well as economic institutions and practices
The king can do no wrong… Making of Bank and the Fund above the Law in Bangladesh • The IFIs are protected from every form of legal process [Art. 8A. (a)]; • The businesses are allowed to bring action against the IFIs in cases arising out of transactions [Art. 8A. (a)]; • Person, agency, entity, directly or indirectly are barred from seeking judicial proceedings and remedy (see 8A. (b) in the Box – 1); • The beneficiaries of this legislation are: World Bank group [International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and International Development Association (IDA)]; IMF (International Monetary Fund); and businesses (e.g. lenders, guarantors, security companies) (Expalnation); and • The disenfranchised are: citizens of Bangladesh, especially the poor and marginalised, and public-interest organisations (grassroots organisations, trade unions, women groups, academia, litigators, NGOs, etc.). Source: IFI Watch Bangladesh, available at: www.unnayan.org
Sovereignty of State, Citizenship, and Rights to Development • The Democratic Deficit – Double Standards, Accountability and Transparency • Reasserting the Parliamentary Sovereignty A people-centred parliament would embark upon: • formulation of a new legislation providing the parliament with the binding oversight powers including holding the Bangladesh representatives at the IFIs accountable to such committees; • enactment of legislation to ensure all information relating to projects is made public in a timely manner, and • Creating mechanisms to facilitate the participation of the people, especially affected communities, and civil society in the design of IFIs' country strategies, programmes and projects. • Establishment of a mechanism ensuring that affected person(s) receive remedy.
CONDITIONALITY – AN ILLUSTRATION Redefined role – Authorship of policies to provider of finance international public goods Policy Space – National Planning Process (not PRSP) – Paris?/?
Slippery Slopes… Sundarbans Biodiversity Conservation Project • Global Environmental Facility – USD 12.2 Million • Nordic Development Fund – USD 4.5 Million • ADB Grant for Khulna Newspaper Mill – USD 0.57 Million • ADB Loan – SDR – 26.9 Million • Suspended – Burden – the people of Bangladesh • Design or Implementation Failure • System of Arbitration – Dispute Settlement Body
Pursuing Common Goals? • A widespread donor view that the solution to poor services lies in increased partnership or interaction between government, NGOs, community organizations and for-profit providers • An area of contention between independent actors with structurally and ideologically different perspectives on the means and ends of public action but who, nonetheless, are engaged in public action through shared organizational arrangements. • The factors that condition the definitions of public action by government and non-governmental actors. • How their different goals are managed and controlled through alternative forms of contractual and non-contractual organizational arrangements. • How the characteristics of the service sectors under examination influence the perspectives of actors and the different possible forms of collaborations between organizations.
The Empire • SWAP – Banks in HNPSP and PEDP • Joint CAS – Banks, DFID, Japan • the Unicef or the Unesco are not in charge of education nor the WHO coordinates the health and nutrition policies and programmes • USAID
A Simple Schema of Issues Development Assistance INTERESTS Trade, Diplomacy, Regional Interest, Historical Connection and Colonial past Institutional reform Ownership Participation – Design and Implementation Good policy CONCERNS Growth, Poverty Reduction, Well-being Accountability (Horizontal and Vertical) Selectivity Reform and conditionalities
Individual Society Knowledge, Praxis and Progress Individual Choice and Development Structural Change and Development Social Individual (Individuals are independent of, dependent on; interdependent within society) Ideas Mobilisation Praxis Development and Democracy