1 / 108

"Web" Malicious Efforts to Obscure Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972

Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is vexed by the very bizarre and persistent frenzy that has targeted him on the internet ever since he made the decision to publish on digital platforms [1] some of his recollections on how he was in the month of January 2010 (as an undergraduate student of Westminster College) informed about the April 05thu00a01986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [2] his questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972...

waacl49129
Download Presentation

"Web" Malicious Efforts to Obscure Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… Skip to main Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) Manage record  Journal article Embargoed  Published November 27, 2023 | Version v1 About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 - # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of Events Contextualizing the Circumstances That Led Up to the Enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act as a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree Graduate of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Even though Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has never sought nor ever solicited nor ever contacted anyone to have his written publications listed and featured prominently on the AOL, Bing/MSN and Yahoo Internet Search Engines (ISE); Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has uncovered many instances where his written content were filtered, distorted, misused and misattributed. Regrettably, this journal article belonging to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W (published on Zenodo) about the circumstances leading up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act is an instance where ISE such as AOL, Bing/MSN and Yahoo have inserted themselves to make unwelcome and unsolicited comments upon it. As a direct consequence of this, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has placed a restriction as well as an embargo for the foreseeable future on his journal with the Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.10211255. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W would like to take this opportunity to clarify that no binding contractual agreements exist between him and ISE such as AOL, Bing/MSN and Yahoo which gives them the right to make unsolicited comments upon the written publications of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on the European Nuclear for Research Organization (CERN) - Zenodo. According to information posted on the website of DataCite Commons, journal articles published or added on the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) – Zenodo, Figshare, Open Science Framework (OSF) and ORCID “maximize their usefulness (…) for the entire research and scholarly communications community” when the data is not modified “so as to make it false, incomplete, defamatory, or misleading.” Based on the statements made by DataCiteCommons, it has become obvious to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that his journal article with the DOI.: 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 will not be maximizing its usefulness on CERN - Zenodo either in the short-term or in the long-term future. https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 1/15

  2. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College (located in Fulton, Missouri) who was in January 2010 informed about the April 05 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” in healthy sexual relationships. Via email dated March 07 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that (his alma mater) Westminster College had extended an invitation to their then Director William Webster to “deliver the 1987 Commencement Address on Sunday, May 17 1987 at 2:30 P.M.” The invitation extended by Westminster College on August 29 1986 came approximately 5 months after the April 05 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania). In other emails beginning November 12 2020, the FBI had informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they had transferred the case of Jeanne Ann Clery rape and murder to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on (or around) June 11 1992. However, via postal mail correspondence that was addressed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, the CIA have denied ever being “assigned” the case of Jeanne Ann Clery on (or around) June 11 1992. It is the opinion of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the letters sent to him by the FBI (beginning November 12 2020) and the CIA (on or around May 21 2021) were inconsistent with one another. For your information, William Webster was Director of the FBI from 1978 to 1987. He was also Director of the CIA from 1987 to 1991. His father Thomas Webster is an alumnus of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri). According to the 2019 – 2020 Student Handbook published by Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri), “the college has comprehensive, intentional, and integrated programming, initiatives, strategies, and campaigns that are intended to end sexual misconduct, dating / domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Programs to prevent sexual misconduct, dating/domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking include both primary prevention and awareness programs directed at incoming students and new employees and ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns directed at students and employees. The ongoing educational programs are overseen by the Title IX Coordinator / Director of Human Resources and Vice-President / Dean of Student Life. All prevention programs are [1] culturally relevant, inclusive of diverse communities and identities, sustainable, responsive to community needs, and empirically based and assessed for value, effectiveness, or outcome; [2] in consideration of environmental risk and protective factors as they occur on the individual relationship, institutional community and societal levels; [3] accessible to students, faculty and staff and accommodated based upon one’s ability status, language, and/or learning style.” th th th th th th th th th st The key questions asked by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery as well as Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 include but are not limited to the following. 1) What were American colleges and universities obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were American colleges and universities required by law to condemn violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations, their national origins and/or their disability status following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were American colleges and universities required to inform their students (beginning Calendar Year 1973) what constitutes appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? 2) Did American colleges and universities begin informing their students what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did American colleges and universities begin to inform their incoming freshmen and transfer students about the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent?” Did American colleges and universities begin teaching the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent” to their students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (on April 5 1986)? If yes, why have American colleges and universities waited so long following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 to inform their students what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent?” 3) Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? 4) Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black or an African American man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black or th https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 2/15

  3. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… African American man (in American colleges and universities); [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)? th As a matter of principle, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W unequivocally condemns violence committed against girls and women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations, their disability status or their age groups. Still, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is vexed by the very bizarre and persistent frenzy that has targeted him on the internet ever since he made the decision to publish on digital platforms [1] some of his recollections on how he was in the month of January 2010 (as an undergraduate student of Westminster College) informed about the April 05 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [2] his questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [3] his correspondence with agents of the U.S government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08 1990; [4] his inquiry on the exact year American colleges and universities began teaching their undergraduate students what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships… th th th Via email dated February 09 2024, the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) – Zenodo have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they are incapable of preventing the filtering and distortion of journal articles published on their platforms on ISE such as AOL, Bing/MSN as well as Yahoo. Zenodo have also informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on (or around) February 09 2024 that they would not delete any journal articles that are over 1 (one) month old even in circumstances where they are presented with evidence that the journal article has gone on to be filtered and distorted on ISE (such as AOL, Bing / MSN and Yahoo) to the displeasure of author / rights holder. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W regrets that his journal article with the DOI.: 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 will not be maximizing its usefulness either in the short- term future or in the long-term future. th th According to a December 27 2023 complaint filed by the New York Times (NYT), Microsoft and OpenAI generative artificial intelligence (“GENAI”) tools rely on large-language models (“LLMs”) that were built “by copying and using millions of NYT copyrighted news articles, in-depth investigations, opinion pieces, reviews, how-to guides and more. (…) Through Microsoft’s Bing Chat (recently rebranded as ‘Copilot’) and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, both Microsoft and OpenAI seek to free- ride on the NYT massive investment in its journalism by using it to build substitutive product without permission or payment. (…) At the same time as Microsoft and OpenAI models are copying, reproducing, and paraphrasing NYT content without consent or compensation, they are also causing the NYT commercial and competitive injury by misattributing content to the NYT that it did not, in fact, publish. In AI parlance, this is called a ‘hallucination.’ In plain English, it’s misinformation. ChatGPT defines a ’hallucination’ as the ‘phenomenon of a machine, such as a chatbot, generating seemingly realistic sensory experiences that do not correspond to any real-world input.’ Instead of saying, ‘I don’t know,’ Microsoft and OpenAI GPT models will confidently provide information that is, at best, not quite accurate, and, at worst, demonstrably (but not recognizably) false. And human reviewers find it very difficult to distinguish ‘hallucinations’ from truthful output. These ‘hallucinations’ mislead users as to the source of the information they are obtaining, leading them to incorrectly believe that the information provided has been vetted and published by the NYT. Users who ask a search engine what the NYT has written on a subject should be provided with neither an unauthorized copy nor an inaccurate forgery of a NYT article, but a link to the article itself.” th The NYT have also noted in their December 27 2023 complaint that “it takes enormous resources to publish, on average, more than 250 original articles every day. Many of these articles take months – and sometimes longer – to report. That output is the work of approximately 5,800 full-time equivalent Times employees (as of December 31 2022), some 2,600 of whom are directly involved in the Time’s journalism operation. Quite often, the most vital news reporting for society is the most resource-intensive. Some of The Time’s most important journalism requires deploying teams of journalists at great cost to report on the ground around the world, providing best-in-class-security and support, filing lawsuits against government entities to bring information to light, and supporting journalists through investigations that can take months or years. (…) Making great journalism is harder than ever. Over the past two decades, the traditional business models that supported quality journalism have collapsed, forcing the shuttering of newspapers all over the country. It has become more st https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 3/15

  4. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… difficult for the public to sort fact from fiction in today’s information ecosystem, as misinformation floods the internet, television, and other media. If The Times and other news organizations cannot produce and protect their independent journalism, there will be a vacuum that no computer or artificial intelligence can fill. The protection of the Time’s intellectual property is critical to its continued ability to fund world-class journalism in the public interest. If The Times and its peers cannot control the use of their content, their ability to monetize that content will be harmed. With less revenue, news organizations will have fewer journalists able to dedicate time and resources to important, in-depth stories, which creates a risk that those stories will go untold. Less journalism will be produced and the cost to society will be enormous. The Times depends on its exclusive rights of reproduction, adaptation, publication, performance, and display under copyright law to resist these forces. (…) The Times requires third parties to obtain permission before using Times content and trademarks for commercial purposes, and for decades The Times has licensed its content under negotiated licensing agreements. These agreements help ensure that The Times controls how, where, and for how long its content and brand appears and that it receives fair compensation for third-party use. Third-parties, including large tech platforms, pay The Times significant royalties under these agreements in exchange for the right to use Times content for narrowly defined purposes. The agreements prohibit uses beyond those authorized purposes. (…) In 2019, the Times published a Pulitzer-prize winning, five-part series on predatory lending in New York City’s taxi industry. The 18-month investigation included 600 interviews, with more than 100 records requests, large scale data analysis, and the review of thousands of pages of internal bank records and other documents, and ultimately led to criminal probes and the enactment of new laws to prevent future abuse. OpenAI had no role in the creation of this content, yet with minimal prompting, will recite large portions of it verbatim.” If you wish, you may access the full complaint filed by the NYT here.: If you wish, you may access the full complaint filed by the NYT here.: https://nytco-assets.nytimes.com/2023/12/NYT_Complaint_Dec2023.pdf . Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W takes full-responsibility for all the statements he has made at the time he decided to publish his journal article entitled: "Approximately 5 (five) Months After the April 05th 1986 Rape and Murder of Jeanne Ann Clery: August 29th 1986 at Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri). Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 as a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree Graduate of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri)." Be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist Notes th When publishing their January 30 2018 report, the National Council on Disability (NCD) had recognized that [1] “affirmative and effective consent” is being taught to (domestic and international) college and university students of the United States of America (U.S.A) during the course of their freshmen year; [2] college and university students in America (whether domestic or international) are informed about “healthy sexual relationships” during the course of their 1 year of post-secondary academic education; [3] 20% of women were sexually assaulted in a college or university setting (of the U.S.A) by the time they reached their Senior Year in Calendar Year 2005; [4] 32% of women with a disability were sexually assaulted during Calendar Years 2014 and 2015 in a college or university setting (of the U.S.A); [5] sexual assault “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” [6] sexual assault is a “deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” [7] sexual assault causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders.” The NCD have also noted that their January 30 2018 report sought to “raise awareness of sexual assault (…) on college campuses by examining college policies and practices.” Furthermore,they write that “Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 is a st th https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 4/15

  5. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity that receives federal funding. Under Title IX, discrimination on the basis of sex can include sexual harassment, rape and sexual assault. A college or university that receives federal funds may be held legally responsible when it knows about and ignores sexual harassment or assault in its programs or activities. As of September 22 2017, colleges can adopt various standards of proof in sexual assault cases, from the lowest standard of proof (preponderance of evidence) to a higher standard of proof (clear and convincing evidence). Title IX, like the Clery Act, also requires college employers that address sexual assault to have proper training and to train the campus community in its policies and procedures regarding sexual assault.” nd Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College (located in Fulton, Missouri) who was in January 2010 informed about the April 05 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” in healthy sexual relationships. Via email dated March 07 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that (his alma mater) Westminster College had extended an invitation to their then Director William Webster to “deliver the 1987 Commencement Address on Sunday, May 17 1987 at 2:30 P.M.” The invitation extended by Westminster College on August 29 1986 came approximately 5 months after the April 05 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania). In another email dated November 12 2020, the FBI had informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they had transferred the case of Jeanne Ann Clery rape and murder to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on (or around) June 11 1992. However, via postal mail correspondence that was addressed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, the CIA have denied ever being “assigned” the case of Jeanne Ann Clery on (or around) June 11 1992. It is the opinion of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the letters sent to him by the FBI (on or around November 12 2020) and the CIA (on or around May 21 2021) were inconsistent with one another. For your information, William Webster was Director of the FBI from 1978 to 1987. He was also Director of the CIA from 1987 to 1991. His father Thomas Webster is an alumnus of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri). According to the 2019 – 2020 Student Handbook published by Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri), “the college has comprehensive, intentional, and integrated programming, initiatives, strategies, and campaigns that are intended to end sexual misconduct, dating / domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Programs to prevent sexual misconduct, dating/domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking include both primary prevention and awareness programs directed at incoming students and new employees and ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns directed at students and employees. The ongoing educational programs are overseen by the Title IX Coordinator / Director of Human Resources and Vice- President / Dean of Student Life. All prevention programs are [1] culturally relevant, inclusive of diverse communities and identities, sustainable, responsive to community needs, and empirically based and assessed for value, effectiveness, or outcome; [2] in consideration of environmental risk and protective factors as they occur on the individual relationship, institutional community and societal levels; [3] accessible to students, faculty and staff and accommodated based upon one’s ability status, language, and/or learning style.” th th th th th th th th th st The key questions asked by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery as well as Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 include but are not limited to the following. 1) What were American colleges and universities obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were American colleges and universities required by law to condemn violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations, their national origins and/or their disability status following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were American colleges and universities required to inform their students (beginning Calendar Year 1973) what constitutes appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? 2) Did American colleges and universities begin informing their students what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did American colleges and universities begin to inform their incoming freshmen and transfer students about the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent?” Did American colleges and universities begin teaching the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent” to their students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (on April https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 5/15

  6. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… th 5 1986)? If yes, why have American colleges and universities waited so long following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 to inform their students what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent?” 3) Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? 4) Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black or an African American man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black or African American man (in American colleges and universities); [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)? th As a matter of principle, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W unequivocally condemns violence committed against girls and women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations, their disability status or their age groups. Still, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is vexed by the very bizarre and persistent frenzy that has targeted him on the internet ever since he made the decision to publish on digital platforms [1] some of his recollections on how he was in the month of January 2010 (as an undergraduate student of Westminster College) informed about the April 05 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [2] his questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [3] his correspondence with agents of the U.S government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08 1990; [4] his inquiry on the exact year American colleges and universities began teaching their undergraduate students what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships… At the time Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W started to publish some of his written content on how he was (in the month of January 2010 as an undergraduate student Westminster College) informed about the April 05 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” in healthy sexual relationships; Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W had not signed any binding agreement that subjected his written content/videos on the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) - Zenodo to evaluation, examination and unsolicited comments intended to “summarize” what the work is about. In other words, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has never agreed to take on the role of the “Student” for his published works on CERN - Zenodowhile the so-called “web” took on the role of “Professor.” Likewise, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has never agreed to take on the role of “Plaintiff” and/or “Defendant” for his published works on CERN - Zenodo while the so-called “web” took on the role of “Judge, Jury and Executioner.” More importantly, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W had started to publish some of his correspondence with agents of the U.S government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08 1990 because of a commitment he had made that he would disseminate any and all responsive U.S government records within their possession to members of the general public and representatives of the media at no financial expense to them. To the best of his ability, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has fulfilled this commitment by disseminating (at no financial expense to representatives of the media and members of the general public) the most pertinent records on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act including but not limited to his correspondence with the United States Department of Education (DoED) as well as the decision of the DoED to withhold many hundreds of pages of documents about Jeanne Clery’s time as an undergraduate student of Lehigh University between August 1985 and April 1986 during their processing of the FOIA request they had assigned Case Number.: 21 – 00103 - F. th th th th According to information posted on the website of DataCite Commons, journal articles published or added on the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) – Zenodo, Figshare, Open Science Framework (OSF) and https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 6/15

  7. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… ORCID “maximize their usefulness (…) for the entire research and scholarly communications community” when the data is not modified “so as to make it false, incomplete, defamatory, or misleading.” Based on the statements made by DataCiteCommons, it has become obvious to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that his journal article with the DOI.: 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 will not be maximizing its usefulness on CERN - Zenodo either in the short-term or in the long-term future. Via email dated February 09 2024, CERN – Zenodo have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they are incapable of preventing the filtering and distortion of journal articles published on their platforms on ISE such as AOL, Bing/MSN as well as Yahoo. Zenodo have also informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on (or around) February 09 2024 that they would not delete any journal articles that are over 1 (one) month old even in circumstances where they are presented with evidence that the journal article has gone on to be filtered and distorted on ISE (such as AOL, Bing / MSN and Yahoo) to the displeasure of author / rights holder. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W regrets that his journal article with the DOI.: 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 will not be maximizing its usefulness either in the short-term future or in the long-term future. th th Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W takes full-responsibility for all the statements he has made at the time he decided to publish his journal article entitled: "Approximately 5 (five) Months After the April 05th 1986 Rape and Murder of Jeanne Ann Clery: August 29th 1986 at Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri). Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 as a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree Graduate of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri)." Be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist Files Aug 29th 1986 at Westmo Jeanne Clery Index.pdf  https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 7/15

  8. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… Files (903.1 kB)  Embargoed  The files will be made publicly available on December 31, 9999. Reason: Even though Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has never sought nor ever solicited nor ever contacted anyone to have his written publications listed and featured prominently on the AOL, Bing/MSN and Yahoo Internet Search Engines (ISE); Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has uncovered many instances where his written content were filtered, distorted, misused and misattributed. Regrettably, this journal article belonging to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W (published on Zenodo) about the circumstances leading up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act is an instance where ISE such as AOL, Bing/MSN and Yahoo have inserted themselves to make unwelcome and unsolicited comments upon it. As a direct consequence of this, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has placed a restriction as well as an embargo for the foreseeable future on his journal with the Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.10211255. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W would like to take this opportunity to clarify that no binding contractual agreements exist between him and ISE such as AOL, Bing/MSN and Yahoo which gives them the right to make unsolicited comments upon the written publications of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on the European Nuclear for Research Organization (CERN) - Zenodo. According to information posted on the website of DataCite Commons, journal articles published or added on the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) – https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 8/15

  9. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… Zenodo, Figshare, Open Science Framework (OSF) and ORCID "maximize their usefulness (…) for the entire research and scholarly communications community" when the data is not modified "so as to make it false, incomplete, defamatory, or misleading." Based on the statements made by DataCiteCommons, it has become obvious to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that his journal article with the DOI.: 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 will not be maximizing its usefulness on CERN - Zenodo either in the short-term or in the long-term future. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College (located in Fulton, Missouri) who was in January 2010 informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships. Via email dated March 07th 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that (his alma mater) Westminster College had extended an invitation to their then Director William Webster to "deliver the 1987 Commencement Address on Sunday, May 17th 1987 at 2:30 P.M." The invitation extended by Westminster College on August 29th 1986 came approximately 5 months after the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania). In other emails beginning November 12th 2020, the FBI had informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they had transferred the case of Jeanne Ann Clery rape and murder to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on (or around) June 11th 1992. However, via postal mail correspondence that was addressed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, the CIA have denied ever being "assigned" the case of Jeanne Ann Clery on (or around) June 11th 1992. It is the opinion of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the letters sent to him by the FBI (beginning November 12th 2020) and the CIA (on or around May 21st 2021) were inconsistent with one another. For your information, William Webster was Director of the FBI from 1978 to 1987. He was also Director of the CIA from 1987 to 1991. His father Thomas Webster is an alumnus of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri). According to the 2019 – 2020 Student Handbook published by Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri), "the college has comprehensive, intentional, and integrated programming, initiatives, strategies, and campaigns that are intended to end sexual misconduct, dating / domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Programs to prevent sexual misconduct, dating/domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking include both primary prevention and awareness programs directed at incoming students and new employees and ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns directed at students and employees. The ongoing educational programs are overseen by the Title IX Coordinator / Director of Human Resources and Vice-President / Dean of Student Life. All prevention programs are [1] culturally relevant, inclusive of diverse communities and identities, sustainable, responsive to community needs, and empirically based and assessed for value, effectiveness, or outcome; [2] in consideration of environmental risk and protective factors as they occur on the individual relationship, institutional community and societal levels; [3] accessible to students, faculty and staff and accommodated based upon one's ability status, language, and/or learning style." The key questions asked by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery as well as Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 include but are not limited to the following. 1) What were American colleges and universities obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were American colleges and universities required by law to condemn violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations, their national origins and/or their disability status following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were American colleges and universities required to inform their students (beginning Calendar Year 1973) what constitutes appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? 2) Did American colleges and universities begin informing their students what constitute "affirmative and effective consent" in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did American colleges and universities begin to inform their incoming freshmen and transfer students about the concepts of "affirmative and effective consent?" Did American colleges and universities begin teaching the concepts of "affirmative and effective consent" to their students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (on April 5th 1986)? If yes, why have American colleges and universities waited so long following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 to inform their students what constitutes "affirmative and effective consent?" 3) Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes "affirmative and effective consent" consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes "affirmative https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 9/15

  10. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… and effective consent" consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? 4) Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black or an African American man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black or African American man (in American colleges and universities); [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18th 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)? As a matter of principle, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W unequivocally condemns violence committed against girls and women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations, their disability status or their age groups. Still, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is vexed by the very bizarre and persistent frenzy that has targeted him on the internet ever since he made the decision to publish on digital platforms [1] some of his recollections on how he was in the month of January 2010 (as an undergraduate student of Westminster College) informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [2] his questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [3] his correspondence with agents of the U.S government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08th 1990; [4] his inquiry on the exact year American colleges and universities began teaching their undergraduate students what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships… Via email dated February 09th 2024, the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) – Zenodo have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they are incapable of preventing the filtering and distortion of journal articles published on their platforms on ISE such as AOL, Bing/MSN as well as Yahoo. Zenodo have also informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on (or around) February 09th 2024 that they would not delete any journal articles that are over 1 (one) month old even in circumstances where they are presented with evidence that the journal article has gone on to be filtered and distorted on ISE (such as AOL, Bing / MSN and Yahoo) to the displeasure of author / rights holder. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W regrets that his journal article with the DOI.: 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 will not be maximizing its usefulness either in the short-term future or in the long-term future. According to a December 27th 2023 complaint filed by the New York Times (NYT), Microsoft and OpenAI generative artificial intelligence ("GENAI") tools rely on large-language models ("LLMs") that were built "by copying and using millions of NYT copyrighted news articles, in- depth investigations, opinion pieces, reviews, how-to guides and more. (…) Through Microsoft's Bing Chat (recently rebranded as 'Copilot') and OpenAI's ChatGPT, both Microsoft and OpenAI seek to free-ride on the NYT massive investment in its journalism by using it to build substitutive product without permission or payment. (…) At the same time as Microsoft and OpenAI models are copying, reproducing, and paraphrasing NYT content without consent or compensation, they are also causing the NYT commercial and competitive injury by misattributing content to the NYT that it did not, in fact, publish. In AI parlance, this is called a 'hallucination.' In plain English, it's misinformation. ChatGPT defines a 'hallucination' as the 'phenomenon of a machine, such as a chatbot, generating seemingly realistic sensory experiences that do not correspond to any real-world input.' Instead of saying, 'I don't know,' Microsoft and OpenAI GPT models will confidently provide information that is, at best, not quite accurate, and, at worst, demonstrably (but not recognizably) false. And human reviewers find it very difficult to distinguish 'hallucinations' from truthful output. These 'hallucinations' mislead users as to the source of the information they are obtaining, leading them to incorrectly believe that the information provided has been vetted and published by the NYT. Users who ask a search engine what the NYT has written on a subject should be provided with neither an unauthorized copy nor an inaccurate forgery of a NYT article, but a link to the article itself." If you wish, you may access the full complaint filed by the NYT here.: https://nytco- assets.nytimes.com/2023/12/NYT_Complaint_Dec2023.pdf . Be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti- Propaganda Journalist Aug 29th 1986 at Westmo Jeanne Clery Index.pdf https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 10/15

  11. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… md5:582514e318bbea01b712f10c977b0a28  903.1 kB Preview Download   Additional details Additional titles Alternative title (English) Approximately 5 (five) Months After the April 05th 1986 Rape and Murder of Jeanne Ann Clery - # August 29th 1986 at Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) - # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 as a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree Graduate of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) Citations   Show only: Search for citation ... Search Literature (0) Dataset (0) Software (0) Unknown (0) Citations To This Version No citations found Edit  New version  Share  66 VIEWS 30 DOWNLOADS   Show more details  https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 11/15

  12. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… Versions Version v1 Nov 27, 2023 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 Cite all versions? You can cite all versions by using the DOI 10.5281/zenodo.10211254. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one. Read more. Communities   Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) Keywords and subjects https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 12/15

  13. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Takes Full Responsibility for the Statements He Made About the Way He Was Informed About Affirmative and Effective Consent in Healthy Sexual Relations on Campus of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) in the Month of January 2010 # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Unequivocally Condemns Violence Committed Against Women Irrespective of Their Racial Backgrounds, Their Sexual Orientations, Their National Origins, Their Religious Affiliations and/or their Disability Status # Key Questions to Consider Hereby Numbered 1: What are/were colleges/universities in the U.S.A obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A required by law to denounce violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations and their national origins following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were colleges/universities required to inform their students about what constitute appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? # Key Questions to Consider Hereby Numbered 2: Did colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A begin informing their students about what constitute "affirmative and effective consent" following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did colleges/universities begin to inform their incoming freshmen/transfer students about the concepts of "affirmative and effective consent?" Did colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A begin teaching the concepts of "affirmative and effective consent" to their incoming freshmen/transfer students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (dated April 05th 1986)? If yes, why have colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A fixated on the rape and murder of this Caucasian woman by a Black/African American man to inform their incoming freshmen/transfer students about what constitutes "affirmative and effective consent?" # Key Questions to Consider Hereby Numbered 3: Are colleges/universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes "affirmative and effective consent" consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming/freshmen students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are colleges/universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes "affirmative and effective consent" consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming freshmen/transfer students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? # Key Questions to Consider Hereby Numbered 4: Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black/African American man; [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18th 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)? # Jeanne Ann Clery (November 23rd 1966 – April 05th 1986) , # Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) # Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 # Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Reference : F – 2021 – 01641 # Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) FOIPA Request No.: 1480829 – 000 # Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) FOIPA Request no.: 1511415 – 000 # Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) File Number 100 – KC – 13743 # Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) File Number 100 – KC – 14235 # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W's Opinion On the Letter He Received Via Postal Mail From the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W's Opinion on the Letter He Received Via Email From the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) # August 29th 1986 at Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) in Perspective and Context by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W # October 31st 1986 at the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Perspective d C t t b Mi h l A A l ( k ) W https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 13/15

  14. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… and Context by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W # Actions Taken by the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) On June 11th 1992 in Perspective and Context by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Details DOI DOI DOI 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 10.5281/zenodo.10211255 Resource type Journal article Publisher Zenodo Languages English Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International : CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED Citation Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W. (2023). About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 - # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of Events Contextualizing the Circumstances That Led Up to the Enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act as a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree Graduate of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10211255 Style APA   Export Export JSON  Technical metadata CreatedNovember 27, 2023 ModifiedSeptember 19, 2024 https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 14/15

  15. 10/7/24, 6:35 AM About the "Web" Unsolicited and Obfuscated Filtering of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Ame… Jump up  About Blog Help Developer s Contribute Funded by About Policies Infrastructure Principles Projects Roadmap Contact Blog FAQ Docs Guides Support GitHub Donate  REST API OAI-PMH  Status Privacy policy Cookie policy Terms of Use Powered by CERN Data Centre & InvenioRDM Support https://zenodo.org/records/10211255 15/15

  16. APPENDIX A.

  17. 2/22/24, 12:20 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> To: waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 5:52 PM https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790433392073163931&simpl=msg-f:1790433392073163931 1/2

  18. 2/22/24, 12:20 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Dear W, Unfortunately, we are not in direct control over how search engines index Zenodo pages. Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 8, 2024 at 22:35 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: From: Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W <waacl13@gmail.com> (561885) Operating System: Windows Browser: Chrome Device: Other Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter to Zenodo because it has recently come to my attention that one of the journal articles I had published was being filtered and distorted on the AOL Internet Search Engine (ISE). The journal article, which I had published on Zenodo that is being distorted on the AOL ISE had been assigned the following Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 As you can see from the screenshots I have taken (which are hereby attached in the body of this email), my written content on Zenodo has been filtered and distorted by the AOL ISE without my consent and approval. What I have previously said/written is that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have decided not to be straightforward about the discussions that were held in their federal government agency about the employment history of Tara Cable in the Village of Suffern, New York even though there's no evidence that she ever filed a Title VII complaint pursuant to the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act. Never have I ever criticized Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII Complaint and yet on the AOL ISE, this is being said about me. Can you explain how it is possible for the journal articles I have published on Zenodo to go on to be filtered and distorted by ISE such as AOL and possibly others? In other words, can you explain how it is possible that the website of Zenodo is not being filtered by ISE such as AOL, but the research content that is being published on Zenodo is being filtered by ISE such as AOL and possibly others? Is there anything you can do about this? Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist Powered by UserVoice. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790433392073163931&simpl=msg-f:1790433392073163931 2/2

  19. 2/22/24, 12:21 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> To: Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, "Michael Ayele (W)" <waacl13@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 7:19 PM Hello, I am writing this letter in response to your earlier correspondence, which I have since reviewed. I am sorry to hear/read that you are unable to prevent the filtering and distortion of journal articles published on Zenodo on Internet Search Engines (ISE) such as AOL, Bing/MSN and possibly others. As a Black man who has previously filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to the provisions of Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act (and dealt with the accompanying headache associated with that), I was very offended when I found out a little earlier this morning that others were saying about me that I was "criticizing Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint." What I found even more offensive is that they were not even using their own platforms/websites to make such assertions, but instead had somehow managed to insert themselves into my Zenodo account to say these most preposterous things! What reasons would I even have to criticize Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint? I'm just so very much vexed as I'm writing this message: the whole thing has ruined my day. A little earlier, I had read that I needed to contact Zenodo to delete a published journal article on Zenodo. Please see the screenshots I have taken of this below. Can you please delete the journal article I have published on Zenodo, which is accessible here: --> https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 ? Thanks. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Screenshot (1132).png 130K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-1335347255974119783&simpl=msg-a:r-13353472559741… 1/1

  20. 2/22/24, 12:22 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> To: waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> Cc: waacl1313@gmail.com, waacl42913@gmail.com Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 7:23 PM https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790439145479980077&simpl=msg-f:1790439145479980077 1/4

  21. 2/22/24, 12:22 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790439145479980077&simpl=msg-f:1790439145479980077 2/4

  22. 2/22/24, 12:22 PM Dear W, Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 We have a one-month grace period for the inactivation of records. In your case, the one-month grace period has passed. We register DOIs (e.g. 10.5281/zenodo.12345) for all uploads to Zenodo. Once a DOI is registered we have an obligation to keep the content, and thus we do not remove records without a valid justification. In case you discovered a mistake, you can create a new version of the record, by going to the published record's page and clicking the green "New version" button on the top right of the page. There, you can update the files and provide new metadata (title, authors, ...). After making your changes, you can publish the new version, at which point a new DOI will be registered for the new version. The old record still exists in our system but will be clearly linked to the new version. You can also update the old record's visibility to "Restricted access" and e.g. use the "Notes" field to provide extra information about errors and recommend using the newer version. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 9, 2024 at 08:20 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, I am writing this letter in response to your earlier correspondence, which I have since reviewed. I am sorry to hear/read that you are unable to prevent the filtering and distortion of journal articles published on Zenodo on Internet Search Engines (ISE) such as AOL, Bing/MSN and possibly others. As a Black man who has previously filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to the provisions of Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act (and dealt with the accompanying headache associated with that), I was very offended when I found out a little earlier this morning that others were saying about me that I was "*criticizing Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint." * What I found even more offensive is that they were not even using their own platforms/websites to make such assertions, but instead had somehow managed to insert themselves into my Zenodo account to say these most preposterous things! What reasons would I even have to criticize Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint? I'm just so very much vexed as I'm writing this message: the whole thing has ruined my day. A little earlier, I had read that I needed to contact Zenodo to delete a published journal article on Zenodo. Please see the screenshots I have taken of this below. Can you please delete the journal article I have published on Zenodo, which is accessible here: --> https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 ? Thanks. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790439145479980077&simpl=msg-f:1790439145479980077 3/4

  23. 2/22/24, 12:22 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 [Quoted text hidden] Powered by UserVoice. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790439145479980077&simpl=msg-f:1790439145479980077 4/4

  24. 2/22/24, 12:22 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> To: Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, "Michael Ayele (W)" <waacl13@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 7:57 PM What more valid justification could there be to delete a journal article that has been published on Zenodo if it's being filtered and distorted on the "web" to say the contrary of what is written on Zenodo? Via email, I have now informed Zenodo that my journal article, which had been assigned DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 was being filtered and distorted to say the exact opposite to what was written at the time I had published it on Zenodo. Why should I be held responsible for the flagrant academic dishonesty that was displayed on the "web?" Do you realize that your failure to delete a journal article published on Zenodo that has been filtered and distorted by the "web" would very much encourage prospective authors who are considering publishing on Zenodo to engage in self-censorship? I will encourage that you be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist [Quoted text hidden] 2 attachments Screenshot (1128).png 165K Web Unwelcome and Distorted Filtering of Zenodo Journal Article.pdf 672K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-6967425684937825734&simpl=msg-a:r-69674256849378… 1/1

  25. 2/22/24, 12:23 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> To: waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> Cc: waacl1313@gmail.com, waacl42913@gmail.com Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 3:42 PM https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790696993023209594&simpl=msg-f:1790696993023209594 1/2

  26. 2/22/24, 12:23 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Dear W, We have a one-month grace period for the inactivation of records, afterwards, we require a valid justification. This justification can, for instance, be a copyright infringement, exposure of data from human subjects, and/or spam records. In your case, the one-month grace period has passed. We register DOIs (e.g. 10.5281/zenodo.12345) for all uploads to Zenodo. Once a DOI is registered we have an obligation to keep the content, and thus we do not remove records without a valid justification. In case you discovered a mistake, you can create a new version of the record, by going to the published record's page and clicking the green "New version" button on the top right of the page. There, you can update the files and provide new metadata (title, authors, ...). After making your changes, you can publish the new version, at which point a new DOI will be registered for the new version. The old record still exists in our system but will be clearly linked to the new version. You can also update the old record's visibility to "Restricted access" and e.g. use the "Notes" field to provide extra information about errors and recommend using the newer version. Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 9, 2024 at 08:58 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: What more valid justification could there be to delete a journal article that has been published on Zenodo if it's being filtered and distorted on the "web" to say the contrary of what is written on Zenodo? Via email, I have now informed Zenodo that my journal article, which had been assigned DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 was being filtered and distorted to say the exact opposite to what was written at the time I had published it on Zenodo. Why should I be held responsible for the flagrant academic dishonesty that was displayed on the "web?" Do you realize that your failure to delete a journal article published on Zenodo that has been filtered and distorted by the "web" would very much encourage prospective authors who are considering publishing on Zenodo to engage in self-censorship? I will encourage that you be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist [Quoted text hidden] Powered by UserVoice. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790696993023209594&simpl=msg-f:1790696993023209594 2/2

  27. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> To: Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com>, "Michael Ayele (W)" <waacl13@gmail.com> Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:33 PM Hello, I continue to think that it's offensive to say "Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W has criticized Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint" and to make this assertion by relying on my Zenodo journal article that had been assigned DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 . As previously noted, I am offended by the way my Zenodo journal article had been filtered and distorted by the "web" on ISE such as AOL and Bing/MSN because what I have written verbatim is: "Even though Tara Cable has never filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have refused to confirm or deny whether they have had discussions about [1] the sexual harassment she experienced between 2018 and 2020 (for a period of two years) during her employment with the Village of Suffern (New York); [2] her so-called “promotion to the position of full-time police officer” with the Village of Suffern (New York); [3] the emotional distress she experienced as a direct consequence of her employment with the Village of Suffern (New York); [4] the complaint she has filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York." I ask you: How is it possible to go from this statement to afterwards say "Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W has criticized Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint" with no bad-faith? On my end, I have decided to place a restriction on the journal article and also an embargo for the foreseeable future. On February 09th 2024, I was sorry to hear/read that you were unable to prevent the filtering/distortion of journal articles that are published on Zenodo. I believe the "web" filtering and distortion of journal articles that are published on Zenodo could lead people to engage in self-censorship for fear that their research papers/correspondence will be misrepresented. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 3:42 PM Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> wrote: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-284178399617024277&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-a:r-28417839… 1/5

  28. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Dear W, Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 We have a one-month grace period for the inactivation of records, afterwards, we require a valid justification. This justification can, for instance, be a copyright infringement, exposure of data from human subjects, and/or spam records. In your case, the one-month grace period has passed. We register DOIs (e.g. 10.5281/zenodo.12345) for all uploads to Zenodo. Once a DOI is registered we have an obligation to keep the content, and thus we do not remove records without a valid justification. In case you discovered a mistake, you can create a new version of the record, by going to the published record's page and clicking the green "New version" button on the top right of the page. There, you can update the files and provide new metadata (title, authors, ...). After making your changes, you can publish the new version, at which point a new DOI will be registered for the new version. The old record still exists in our system but will be clearly linked to the new version. You can also update the old record's visibility to "Restricted access" and e.g. use the "Notes" field to provide extra information about errors and recommend using the newer version. Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 9, 2024 at 08:58 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: What more valid justification could there be to delete a journal article that has been published on Zenodo if it's being filtered and distorted on the "web" to say the contrary of what is written on Zenodo? Via email, I have now informed Zenodo that my journal article, which had been assigned DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 was being filtered and distorted to say the exact opposite to what was written at the time I had published it on Zenodo. Why should I be held responsible for the flagrant academic dishonesty that was displayed on the "web?" Do you realize that your failure to delete a journal article published on Zenodo that has been filtered and distorted by the "web" would very much encourage prospective authors who are considering publishing on Zenodo to engage in self-censorship? I will encourage that you be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist On Feb 9, 2024 at 08:23 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> wrote: Dear W, We have a one-month grace period for the inactivation of records. In your case, the one-month grace period has passed. We register DOIs (e.g. 10.5281/zenodo.12345) for all uploads to Zenodo. Once a DOI is registered we have an https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-284178399617024277&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-a:r-28417839… 2/5

  29. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 obligation to keep the content, and thus we do not remove records without a valid justification. In case you discovered a mistake, you can create a new version of the record, by going to the published record's page and clicking the green "New version" button on the top right of the page. There, you can update the files and provide new metadata (title, authors, ...). After making your changes, you can publish the new version, at which point a new DOI will be registered for the new version. The old record still exists in our system but will be clearly linked to the new version. You can also update the old record's visibility to "Restricted access" and e.g. use the "Notes" field to provide extra information about errors and recommend using the newer version. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 9, 2024 at 08:20 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, I am writing this letter in response to your earlier correspondence, which I have since reviewed. I am sorry to hear/read that you are unable to prevent the filtering and distortion of journal articles published on Zenodo on Internet Search Engines (ISE) such as AOL, Bing/MSN and possibly others. As a Black man who has previously filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to the provisions of Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act (and dealt with the accompanying headache associated with that), I was very offended when I found out a little earlier this morning that others were saying about me that I was "*criticizing Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint." * What I found even more offensive is that they were not even using their own platforms/websites to make such assertions, but instead had somehow managed to insert themselves into my Zenodo account to say these most preposterous things! What reasons would I even have to criticize Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint? I'm just so very much vexed as I'm writing this message: the whole thing has ruined my day. A little earlier, I had read that I needed to contact Zenodo to delete a published journal article on Zenodo. Please see the screenshots I have taken of this below. Can you please delete the journal article I have published on Zenodo, which is accessible here: --> https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 ? Thanks. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist On Feb 9, 2024 at 06:52 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> wrote: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-284178399617024277&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-a:r-28417839… 3/5

  30. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Dear W, Unfortunately, we are not in direct control over how search engines index Zenodo pages. Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 8, 2024 at 22:35 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: From: Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W <waacl13@gmail.com> (561885) Operating System: Windows Browser: Chrome Device: Other Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter to Zenodo because it has recently come to my attention that one of the journal articles I had published was being filtered and distorted on the AOL Internet Search Engine (ISE). The journal article, which I had published on Zenodo that is being distorted on the AOL ISE had been assigned the following Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 As you can see from the screenshots I have taken (which are hereby attached in the body of this email), my written content on Zenodo has been filtered and distorted by the AOL ISE without my consent and approval. What I have previously said/written is that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have decided not to be straightforward about the discussions that were held in their federal government agency about the employment history of Tara Cable in the Village of Suffern, New York even though there's no evidence that she ever filed a Title VII complaint pursuant to the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act. Never have I ever criticized Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII Complaint and yet on the AOL ISE, this is being said about me. Can you explain how it is possible for the journal articles I have published on Zenodo to go on to be filtered and distorted by ISE such as AOL and possibly others? In other words, can you explain how it is possible that the website of Zenodo is not being filtered by ISE such as AOL, but the research content that is being published on Zenodo is being filtered by ISE such as AOL and possibly others? Is there anything you can do about this? Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist Powered by UserVoice. 2 attachments https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-284178399617024277&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-a:r-28417839… 4/5

  31. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Screenshot (1128).png 165K Web Unwelcome and Distorted Filtering of Zenodo Journal Article.pdf 672K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-284178399617024277&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-a:r-28417839… 5/5

  32. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> To: waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> Cc: waacl1313@gmail.com, waacl42913@gmail.com Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:37 PM https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790700481668338913&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f:17907004816… 1/6

  33. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790700481668338913&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f:17907004816… 2/6

  34. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Dear W, Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 OK, good to see that you managed to restrict access to the files as suggest. I will go ahead and close this ticket. Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 12, 2024 at 05:34 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, I continue to think that it's offensive to say "*Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W has criticized Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint" *and to make this assertion by relying on my Zenodo journal article that had been assigned DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 . As previously noted, I am offended by the way my Zenodo journal article had been filtered and distorted by the "web" on ISE such as AOL and Bing/MSN because what I have written verbatim is: "*Even though Tara Cable has never filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have refused to confirm or deny whether they have had discussions about [1] the sexual harassment she experienced between 2018 and 2020 (for a period of two years) during her employment with the Village of Suffern (New York); [2] her so-called “promotion to the position of full-time police officer” with the Village of Suffern (New York); [3] the emotional distress she experienced as a direct consequence of her employment with the Village of Suffern (New York); [4] the complaint she has filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.*" I ask you: How is it possible to go from this statement to afterwards say "*Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W has criticized Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint" *with no bad-faith? On my end, I have decided to place a restriction on the journal article and also an embargo for the foreseeable future. On February 09th 2024, I was sorry to hear/read that you were unable to prevent the filtering/distortion of journal articles that are published on Zenodo. I believe the "web" filtering and distortion of journal articles that are published on Zenodo could lead people to engage in self-censorship for fear that their research papers/correspondence will be misrepresented. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790700481668338913&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f:17907004816… 3/6

  35. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 On Feb 12, 2024 at 04:42 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> wrote: Dear W, We have a one-month grace period for the inactivation of records, afterwards, we require a valid justification. This justification can, for instance, be a copyright infringement, exposure of data from human subjects, and/or spam records. In your case, the one-month grace period has passed. We register DOIs (e.g. 10.5281/zenodo.12345) for all uploads to Zenodo. Once a DOI is registered we have an obligation to keep the content, and thus we do not remove records without a valid justification. In case you discovered a mistake, you can create a new version of the record, by going to the published record's page and clicking the green "New version" button on the top right of the page. There, you can update the files and provide new metadata (title, authors, ...). After making your changes, you can publish the new version, at which point a new DOI will be registered for the new version. The old record still exists in our system but will be clearly linked to the new version. You can also update the old record's visibility to "Restricted access" and e.g. use the "Notes" field to provide extra information about errors and recommend using the newer version. Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 9, 2024 at 08:58 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: What more valid justification could there be to delete a journal article that has been published on Zenodo if it's being filtered and distorted on the "web" to say the contrary of what is written on Zenodo? Via email, I have now informed Zenodo that my journal article, which had been assigned DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 was being filtered and distorted to say the exact opposite to what was written at the time I had published it on Zenodo. Why should I be held responsible for the flagrant academic dishonesty that was displayed on the "web?" Do you realize that your failure to delete a journal article published on Zenodo that has been filtered and distorted by the "web" would very much encourage prospective authors who are considering publishing on Zenodo to engage in self-censorship? I will encourage that you be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist On Feb 9, 2024 at 08:23 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> wrote: Dear W, We have a one-month grace period for the inactivation of records. In your case, the one-month grace period has passed. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790700481668338913&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f:17907004816… 4/6

  36. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 p We register DOIs (e.g. 10.5281/zenodo.12345) for all uploads to Zenodo. Once a DOI is registered we have an obligation to keep the content, and thus we do not remove records without a valid justification. In case you discovered a mistake, you can create a new version of the record, by going to the published record's page and clicking the green "New version" button on the top right of the page. There, you can update the files and provide new metadata (title, authors, ...). After making your changes, you can publish the new version, at which point a new DOI will be registered for the new version. The old record still exists in our system but will be clearly linked to the new version. You can also update the old record's visibility to "Restricted access" and e.g. use the "Notes" field to provide extra information about errors and recommend using the newer version. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 9, 2024 at 08:20 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, I am writing this letter in response to your earlier correspondence, which I have since reviewed. I am sorry to hear/read that you are unable to prevent the filtering and distortion of journal articles published on Zenodo on Internet Search Engines (ISE) such as AOL, Bing/MSN and possibly others. As a Black man who has previously filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to the provisions of Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act (and dealt with the accompanying headache associated with that), I was very offended when I found out a little earlier this morning that others were saying about me that I was "*criticizing Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint." * What I found even more offensive is that they were not even using their own platforms/websites to make such assertions, but instead had somehow managed to insert themselves into my Zenodo account to say these most preposterous things! What reasons would I even have to criticize Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint? I'm just so very much vexed as I'm writing this message: the whole thing has ruined my day. A little earlier, I had read that I needed to contact Zenodo to delete a published journal article on Zenodo. Please see the screenshots I have taken of this below. Can you please delete the journal article I have published on Zenodo, which is accessible here: --> https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 ? Thanks. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790700481668338913&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f:17907004816… 5/6

  37. 2/22/24, 12:24 PM Gmail - Re: [other]: I'm thinking of deleting a journal article I have published on Zenodo : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 On Feb 9, 2024 at 06:52 Zenodo <info@zenodo.org> wrote: Dear W, Unfortunately, we are not in direct control over how search engines index Zenodo pages. Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with. Best regards, Pablo Zenodo Support https://zenodo.org Support Zenodo — Could we suggest you support Zenodo’s features' development by donating to the CERN & Society Foundation? For more information see https://zenodo.org/donate or reach out directly to our Partnerships & Fundraising colleagues (donorcare@csf.cern.ch) if you have any doubts about the donation process. On Feb 8, 2024 at 22:35 waacl13 <waacl13@gmail.com> wrote: From: Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W <waacl13@gmail.com> (561885) Operating System: Windows Browser: Chrome Device: Other Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter to Zenodo because it has recently come to my attention that one of the journal articles I had published was being filtered and distorted on the AOL Internet Search Engine (ISE). The journal article, which I had published on Zenodo that is being distorted on the AOL ISE had been assigned the following Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 As you can see from the screenshots I have taken (which are hereby attached in the body of this email), my written content on Zenodo has been filtered and distorted by the AOL ISE without my consent and approval. What I have previously said/written is that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have decided not to be straightforward about the discussions that were held in their federal government agency about the employment history of Tara Cable in the Village of Suffern, New York even though there's no evidence that she ever filed a Title VII complaint pursuant to the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act. Never have I ever criticized Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII Complaint and yet on the AOL ISE, this is being said about me. Can you explain how it is possible for the journal articles I have published on Zenodo to go on to be filtered and distorted by ISE such as AOL and possibly others? In other words, can you explain how it is possible that the website of Zenodo is not being filtered by ISE such as AOL, but the research content that is being published on Zenodo is being filtered by ISE such as AOL and possibly others? Is there anything you can do about this? Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist Powered by UserVoice. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1790700481668338913&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f:17907004816… 6/6

  38. 2/9/24, 8:34 PM About the Decision of Tara Cable Not to File a Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace … Skip to main Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) Manage record  Published September 25, 2023 | Version v1 Journal article Embargoed  About the Decision of Tara Cable Not to File a Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace - #Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W - #Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W1 Show affiliations Even though Tara Cable has never filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have refused to confirm or deny whether they have had discussions about [1] the sexual harassment she experienced between 2018 and 2020 (for a period of two years) during her employment with the Village of Suffern (New York); [2] her so-called “promotion to the position of full-time police officer” with the Village of Suffern (New York); [3] the emotional distress she experienced as a direct consequence of her employment with the Village of Suffern (New York); [4] the complaint she has filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. After thoroughly reviewing the documents filed by Tara Cable with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (which are on the Internet’s public domain), the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) was gravely concerned about Tara Cable’s so-called “promotion to the position of full-time police officer” with the Village of Suffern (New York). The AACL was shocked to learn that no news media outlet filed a New York Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request to find out whether Tara Cable was subject of very inappropriate discussions in the police department of the Village of Suffern (New York) prior to her so-called “promotion.” In the judgment of the AACL, Tara Cable really needs to watch her six o’clock. As a matter of principle, the AACL unequivocally condemns violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations, their national origins, their disability status and/or their employment history. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist https://zenodo.org/records/8375096 1/6

  39. 2/9/24, 8:34 PM About the Decision of Tara Cable Not to File a Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace … Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist Notes (English) Even though Tara Cable has never filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have refused to confirm or deny whether they have had discussions about [1] the sexual harassment she experienced between 2018 and 2020 (for a period of two years) during her employment with the Village of Suffern (New York); [2] her so-called "promotion to the position of full-time police officer" with the Village of Suffern (New York); [3] the emotional distress she experienced as a direct consequence of her employment with the Village of Suffern (New York); [4] the complaint she has filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. As a matter of principle, the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) unequivocally condemns violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations, their national origins, their disability status and/or their employment history. Files Tara Cable Decision Not to File Title VII Complaint After Sexual Harassment.pdf  Files (350.6 kB)  Embargoed  The files will be made publicly available on December 31, 9999. https://zenodo.org/records/8375096 2/6

  40. 2/9/24, 8:34 PM About the Decision of Tara Cable Not to File a Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace … Reason: I have asked Zenodo to delete this journal article because it had gone on to be filtered and distorted by the "web" on various Internet Search Engines, which may include but may not be limited to AOL, Bing/MSN and Yahoo. On February 09th 2024, I was very sorry to hear/read that Zendo was unable to prevent the filtering and distortion of journal articles that were published with them. As a Black man who has previously filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to the provisions of Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act (and dealt with the accompanying headache associated with that), I was very offended when I found out a little earlier this morning (on February 09th 2024) that others were saying about me that I was "criticizing Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint." What I found even more offensive is that they were not even using their own platforms/websites to make such assertions, but instead had somehow managed to insert themselves into my Zenodo account to say these most preposterous things! What reasons would I even have to criticize Tara Cable for not filing a Title VII complaint? As the rights holder of DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8375096, I was very much vexed by the unwelcome filtering and distortion of my journal article, which is why I've decided to apply an embargo for this publication that will last for the foreseeable very long term future. Disappointedly, W (AACL) - Michael A. Ayele. Tara Cable Decision Not to File Title VII Complaint After Sexual Harassment.pdf md5:017efff2e2f064be579560003786cb17  350.6 kB Preview Download   Citations   Show only: Search for citation ... Search Literature (0) Dataset (0) Software (0) Unknown (0) Citations To This Version No citations found Edit  New version  Share  22 VIEWS 20 DOWNLOADS   https://zenodo.org/records/8375096 3/6

  41. 2/9/24, 8:34 PM About the Decision of Tara Cable Not to File a Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace … Show more details  Versions Version v1 Sep 25, 2023 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Cite all versions? You can cite all versions by using the DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8375095. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one. Read more. Communities   Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) Keywords and subjects #Tara Cable Employment History in the Village of Suffern, New York in Perspective and Context by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W # Tara Cable Decision Not To File Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) About the Sexual Harassment of Tara Cable at the Workplace # Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) # Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act Details DOI DOI DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Resource type Journal article Publisher Zenodo Languages English https://zenodo.org/records/8375096 4/6

  42. 2/9/24, 8:34 PM About the Decision of Tara Cable Not to File a Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace … Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED Citation Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W. (2023). About the Decision of Tara Cable Not to File a Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace - #Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W - #Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8375096 Style APA   Export Export JSON  Technical metadata CreatedSeptember 25, 2023 ModifiedFebruary 9, 2024 Jump up  https://zenodo.org/records/8375096 5/6

  43. 2/9/24, 8:34 PM About the Decision of Tara Cable Not to File a Title VII Complaint Even After Falling Victim to Sexual Harassment at the Workplace … About Blog Help Developer s Contribute Funded by About Policies Infrastructure Principles Projects Roadmap Contact Blog FAQ Docs Guides Support GitHub Donate  REST API OAI-PMH  Status Privacy policy Terms of Use Support Powered by CERN Data Centre & InvenioRDM https://zenodo.org/records/8375096 6/6

  44. APPENDIX B.

More Related