100 likes | 118 Views
Explore the impact of biofuels on energy security, agriculture, and rural development while addressing challenges and opportunities for sustainable production. Analyze economics, trade, and policy implications for promoting self-sufficiency and combating climate change.
E N D
Drivers for biofuel • Energy security – • Diversification • Self-sufficiency • Climate change • Agriculture and rural development • Support for domestic farmers • Increasing demand, higher income for farmers and agribusiness, job creation, more opportunities for trade
First-generation liquid biofuels • Limitations in economics and production potential widely acknowledged • More than half of production cost due to feedstock • Domestic production and consumption of biofuels economic under few favorable circumstances (Brazil in 2005 and 2007-08), but uneconomic most of the time • Hence heavily protected, mostly domestic, limited trade • Large price distortions and forward and backward linkages with other price-distorted markets.
Impact of higher biofuel demand • Correlation with gasoline and diesel prices • Threshold diversion level for strong correlation to emerge? • Second generation biofuels may present different challenges for developing countries. Food vs. fuel conflict may persist. • Potentially adverse impact on climate change where land use changes occur → Large subsidies and mandates are driving these consequences
Economics of ethanol production from sugar cane *83% sugar and 17% molasses, and molasses priced at 25% of sugar; 20% fuel economy penalty for ethanol
Economics of ethanol production from sugar cane *83% sugar and 17% molasses, and molasses priced at 25% of sugar; 20% fuel economy penalty for ethanol
Vegetable oil vs. diesel prices *Price data from USDA FAS, World Bank and Energy Intelligence
Vegetable oil vs. diesel prices *Price data from USDA FAS, World Bank and Energy Intelligence
Price dynamics Oil price Weather
Support policies • Mandates • Create inelastic demand, introducing potential for large price shocks without an escape clause • Are politically difficult to reverse • Subsidies • Either taxpayers pay, or consumers pay if mandated • Concern that some developing countries are following the U.S. and EU subsidy policies
Additional thoughts • Reasons for supporting biofuels are attractive: rural development, reducing global warming, enhancing energy security. But a biofuel program may not be a good vehicle for addressing them; separate policy solutions may be more cost-effective. • Support policies in OECD countries raise many questions, but are being copied in developing countries. • Removing border restrictions in OECD for biofuels • would enhance competition and bring down prices in currently protected markets • but could prolong current market distortions • could force governments to ask openly about the objectives and costs of biofuel support policies.