250 likes | 277 Views
‘Securing Land and Property Rights for All’. ‘ Monetising Geo-Spatial Value and Products for Land Administration’ By: Clarissa Augustinus and Danilo Antonio. GLTN Secretariat, facilitated by PO Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
E N D
‘Securing Land and Property Rights for All’ ‘Monetising Geo-Spatial Value and Products for Land Administration’ By: Clarissa Augustinus and Danilo Antonio GLTN Secretariat, facilitated by PO Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Tel: +254 20 762 51 19, Fax: +254 20 762 46 52 Email: gltn@unhabitat.org
A TECHNICAL GAP IN LAND SYSTEMS DELIVERING LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR THE POOR Singapore /http://destinationmarketing.com.au
A TECHNICAL GAP IN LAND SYSTEMS DELIVERING LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR THE POOR Amsterdam /http://www.archined.nl
A TECHNICAL GAP IN LAND SYSTEMS DELIVERING LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR THE POOR Germany http://www.123rf.com
A TECHNICAL GAP IN LAND SYSTEMS DELIVERING LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR THE POOR Hong Kong United Kingdom Ireland
A TECHNICAL GAP IN LAND SYSTEMS DELIVERING LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR THE POOR Aerial view of Kibera, Nairobi, Kenya/ UN-HABITAT
A TECHNICAL GAP IN LAND SYSTEMS DELIVERING LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR THE POOR Aerial view of Dharavi, India
A TECHNICAL GAP IN LAND SYSTEMS DELIVERING LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR THE POOR Kisumu, Kenya / UN-HABITAT
The Vision • What is the value and practice for pro-poor geospatial LA products? • Monetisation vs. value creation • Cost and value sharing • Purpose, process and product Reality check: • 70% of land rights outside LA systems • Land reform is slow (or very slow!) • Conventional approaches are still the preferred solution! • Need for more innovations
What are the customer needs of the poor? • Similar to conventional Land Administration customers! • Participatory enumeration - Civil society + slum dwellers • Post disaster – Haiti government • Watershed and Forestry – Govt. Ministries • Climate Change Mitigation – Coastal towns • City management – Mayors and local government • Planning – Government, private sector, society • By poor themselves – rural/urban security of tenure, housing, services (e.g. electricity, roads, health)
But poor have unique needs… • Group vs. individual • Gender issues • Power dynamics • Legitimacy vs. legality • Complexity and ambiguity • Context and “Fit for purpose” • Appropriate land governance arrangements There is huge demand…but who pays? Who benefits?
The Challenge for Geo-Spatial Professionals How to support various tenure types and systems to enable land reform and secure land and property rights for all at scale? How to make use of geo spatial technologies and solutions in a participatory, affordable and pro-poor way?
New Thinking • Continuum of land rights • Example innovations • As simple as participatory enumeration! • STDM concept, model & software • Pro-poor land recordation • GLTN as a platform + creator of innovative products
Continuum of Land Rights Continuum of land rights, GLTN/ UN-HABITAT How to support at scale?
Participatory Enumeration How to integrate technology with community-driven processes?
Parcel Right Person The Social Tenure Domain Model A TECHNICAL GAP IN LAND SYSTEMS DELIVERING LAND ADMINISTRATION FOR THE POOR The Social Tenure Domain Model A Pro Poor Land Tool: Lemmen 2010
Social Tenure Relationship • Use rights • Occupancy • Ownership • Informal Tenure • Customary tenure • Common land • Tenancy • Hunting Party Person/s or group/s Spatial Unit Point, line, polygon STDM Conceptual Model has with supported by Source Document Sketch, audio, video, photos etc.
Pro Poor Land Recordation Can land recording be co-managed by government and community?
The Global Land Tool Network • Coalition of more than 50 international partners • Focuses on tenure security improvement, tools development and capacity development • Promotes good land governance and continuum of land rights • Works in both urban and rural areas • Core Values: • Pro-poor • Governance • Equity • Subsidiarity • Affordability • Systematic large scale approach • Gender sensitiveness • Sustainability
Some Questions • Choice between conventional LA approach and pro-poor LA innovation? Responsibility by governments, donors, citizens or private sector? • Monetization of LA products – For cost recovery? For profit? For public goods? Where is the balance? • Government funding for LA – Cost and data sharing? What are the constraints? What are the opportunities? Role of private sector? • Business model for monetization? Monetization opportunity or social responsibility? How to apply such model in poor countries or with poor people in a wealthy society? • ???
Dank je wel Thank you very much Asante sana Please visit: www.gltn.net Join us in: “Securing Land and Property Rights for All”