110 likes | 196 Views
BREAKING THE CARBON BARRIER: RELIGION & RISK REGIMES. EC-US Task Force on Biotechnology Research Nanobiotechnology Workshop Ispra, Italy June 3, 2008. David M. Berube Co-ord, PCOST – Public Communication of Science and Technology North Carolina State University USA. PRINCIPLES.
E N D
BREAKING THE CARBON BARRIER: RELIGION & RISK REGIMES EC-US Task Force on Biotechnology Research Nanobiotechnology Workshop Ispra, Italy June 3, 2008 David M. Berube Co-ord, PCOST – Public Communication of Science and Technology North Carolina State University USA
PRINCIPLES • Risk is a social construct. • Experts/publics differ on ranking risks. • Risks are attenuated/amplified by third parties, including NGOs and the media. • Trust is always a factor in communicating risk.
NANOBIO • To the public, biotechnology remains an unknown. Nanotechnology is equally obtuse. Nanobiotechnology seems simply a made-up word. • Examples. • Medicine and health care • Environmental remediation. • Agricultural productivity. • Human enhancement.
FALLACIES & AXIOLOGIES • Fallacies • Ecological fallacy (naturalness). • Future generation fallacy. • Axiologies • Webs of value constructs. • Anecdotes, stories & epiphanies. • Beliefs.
RELIGION, BELIEF & NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY • Nanomedicine and nanobiology. • Fear of death • Coat-tails phenomenon. • Fundamental principles. • Humanity and godliness. • Nature/unnaturalness & dominion. • Dehumanization.
EXAMPLES from USA • Examples (non-rational systems). • Abortion. • Embryonic stem cell research. • Gay marriage. • Implications • Lopsided debate; no middle ground. • Beliefs and dogma as warrants. • Accommodation and compromise are sinful.
PUBLIC RISK PERCEPTION • Deep and emotional; confronting dispositional or eliminativism. • Belief and the heresiarch, science in the role of Arius and King Henry VIII. • Scientists as endoheretics (Asimov). • a non-crackpot or charlatan. • Religion becomes grounds for warrants as well as an amplifier.
STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS • Denial = heresy. • Scientific mission and can/should conundrum. • Recasting the role of science. • Proselytizing/conversion as a rhetorical tactic.
NEW RISK REGIME • Consensuality and stakeholding; opening the debate for religious arguments. • Threshold free and slippery slopes; most belief driven arguments are totalistic. • Politics of belief; learn from the right wing conservatives.
EC-US COOPERATION • Draft a statement on the ethics of nanobiotechnology. • Track discoveries – proof of concepts and product lines. • Share data sets associated with nanobiotechnology. • Design an appropriate risk regime.
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, NSF 06-538 Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education (NUE): Nanoscience and Technology Studies Cognate, and NSF 06-595, Nanotechnology Interdisciplinary Research Team (NIRT): Intuitive Toxicology and Public Engagement. THANKSdmberube@ncsu.edu