1 / 6

GPDs and skeewing [R=GPDs/PDFs] important for quarks DVCS R² > 4 impact on cross sections…

Evolution of GPDs at NLO. Laurent Schoeffel (CEA/Saclay) : June 05. GPDs and skeewing [R=GPDs/PDFs] important for quarks DVCS R² > 4 impact on cross sections… We have a large Q² range of measurements : Q² evolution (GPDs) ?

wan
Download Presentation

GPDs and skeewing [R=GPDs/PDFs] important for quarks DVCS R² > 4 impact on cross sections…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evolution of GPDs at NLO Laurent Schoeffel (CEA/Saclay) : June 05 GPDs and skeewing [R=GPDs/PDFs] important for quarks DVCS R² > 4 impact on cross sections… We have a large Q² range of measurements : Q² evolution (GPDs) ? GPDs of gluons => large effect for DVCS AND for VMs : R²>1.5 impact on J/ cross sections… Here also, large Q² range! => Intesrest for an evolution code of GPDs at NLO : Basis : Freund routines for splitting functions. THEN

  2. Skeewing for Quarks 1. The skeewing of the GPD is important already at 1.5/2  2. x< belongs to the ERBL domain => another regime of QCD evol In particular, we can check the symmetry at /2 conserved by the QCD evolution! see Martin et al. ’99 3. Above Q²> 5 GeV², the Q² evol for GPDs is quite low / DGLAP evol alone… (<= matching with the ERBL domain) 4. R= [A] / [B] ~ 2 (at 5 GeV²) Note :R ~ 2.5/3 at  < 0.01 =0.2 [A] GPD 5 GeV² GPD 21 GeV² [B] u+ubar (MRS/CTEQ) Standard PDF (5 GeV²) Matching (continuity) of FDGLAP and FERBL/ not trivial… (sum rules)

  3. Q² evolution and skeewing 1 ; 5 ; 21 GeV² Q² and  are « mixed » in the evolution + matching at x=…. Q² evol Q² evol =0.5 =0.2 Initial param of the GPD Q0² = 1 GeV² Influence of the D-term

  4. Skeewing for Gluons =10-4 Important skeewing of the complete distribution Results in agreement with Martin et al. (Shuvaev) ‘99 Symmetry in the ERBL domain =0.01 21 GeV² Large Q² evolution… 5 GeV² RG~ 1.3/1.4 5 GeV² MRS/CTEQ

  5. Conclusions Possibility to implement directly the Gluon GPDs in Martin et al. calculations => Examine the differences with the « effective » approximation GPD=RG xG ! => A way to solve the problems arising with the RG derivations / Fit group… Short/Mid Term : DVCS amplitudes at NLO from the GPDs : at LO, very simple, ADVCS ~ -i  GPD(x=,,Q²) + « Re » Then, we would have the complete chain for MC MILOU : the present version is using files of amplitudes produced by Freund => impossible to change the param. in the MC… In the future : Combined DVCS/ VMs QCD Fit => GPDs But only after analysis of 03-05 data + charge asymmetry !

  6. Skeewing for Quarks (appendix) X  [0,1] LO DVCS graph p+(x-) x p+ (x-) p+ Fq+qbar(x,,…) GPD Low xBj =>  ~ xBj ADVCS ~  dx 1/ (x- +i)Fq+qbar(x,,…) +…  -i FS(,,…) + “Re” R = FS(,,…)/Q(,...) ~2 => factor R²~4 on DVCS Freund et al. ‘99

More Related