Title: PUBLICATION OF MANUSCRIPT

1. online By Dr. Aamarpali Roy Email : drpuri@yahoo.com Mobile: +919051345485 Editor-in-Chief IDC INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Managing Editor The Genesis Title: PUBLICATION OF MANUSCRIPT

3. Research Articles : It reports substantial and original scientific results within the journal's scope. Generally, these are expected to be between 5 to 8 journal pages. It may contain appropriate figures and/or tables, a maximum of 15 references, and an abstract of 100–200 words. Review Articles It summarizes the status of knowledge and outline future directions of research. The length of these articles are expected to be maximum 8 journal pages. It may include maximum 50 references, appropriate figures and/or tables, and an abstract of 100–200 words. The following types of manuscripts can be considered for peer-reviewed publication

4. Brief Communications are timely, peer-reviewed and short (2–4 journal pages). These may be used to (a) report new developments, significant advances and novel aspects of experimental and theoretical methods and techniques which are relevant for scientific investigations within the journal scope; (b) report/discuss on significant matters of policy and perspective related to the science of the journal, including 'personal' commentary; (c) disseminate information and data on topical events of significant scientific and/or social interest within the scope of the journal. Brief Communications have a maximum of three figures and/or tables, maximum 10 references, and an abstract length not exceeding 100 words. The manuscript title must start with "Brief Communication:” The following types of manuscripts can be considered for peer-reviewed publication (Conti…)

5. Invited Perspective Articles It forms an occasional series of solicited reports on topical and/or emerging fields of research of particular interest, authored by leading experts in the discipline. They may include a commentary element. Comments & Replies are peer-reviewed, 1 page each (for a total of 2 pages), and include discussion and commentary that address significant aspects of a paper already published in the journal within the last year, without (a) becoming essentially new papers, (b) delving into too much detail, (c) becoming personal. A Comment & Reply should address non-trivial points of interest to readers other than the authors of the comment and the paper being commented on. The manuscript title should start with "Comment on" or "Reply to". Book Reviews provide a "critique" of a book, and are not primarily a summary. They are less than 1000 words and start with "Book Review on:". The following types of manuscripts can be considered for peer-reviewed publication (Conti…)

6. An author's primary obligation is to present a concise, accurate account of the research performed, as well as an objective discussion of its significance. • A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to public sources of information to permit the author‘s peers to repeat the work. • A paper should be as concise as possible but not at the expense of scientific accuracy and completeness. To promote scientific conciseness and completeness at the same time, the inclusion of a comprehensive abstract is encouraged. • Papers have to be written in English, and authors should pay attention to correct spelling and grammar. • An author should cite those publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work and that will quickly guide the reader to the initial work essential for understanding the present investigation. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, should not be used or reported in the author's work without explicit permission from the investigator with whom the information originated. General Obligations for Authors

7. Fragmentation of research papers should be avoided. A scientist who has done extensive work on a system or group of related systems should organize publication so that each paper gives a complete account of a particular aspect of the general study. It is inappropriate for an author to submit manuscripts describing essentially the same research to more than one journal of primary publication. A criticism of a published paper may sometimes be justified; however, in no case is personal criticism considered to be appropriate. To protect the integrity of authorship, only persons who have significantly contributed to the research and paper preparation should be listed as authors. The corresponding author attests to the fact that any others named as authors have seen the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. Deceased persons who meet the criterion for co-authorship should be included, with a footnote reporting date of death. No fictitious names should be listed as authors or co-authors. The author who submits a manuscript for publication accepts the responsibility of having included as co-authors all persons that are appropriate and none that are inappropriate. General Obligations for Authors (Conti…)

9. Responsibilities Reviewers should provide an honest and constructive assessment of the value of the manuscript. An appropriate assessment includes an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the study; suggestions on how to make the manuscript more complete, relevant, and readable; and specific questions for the authors to address to make any revision of the manuscript acceptable and useful to the intended audience. Whenever possible, complete citations should be provided for important work that has been omitted. Reviewers must maintain confidentiality about the manuscripts they review. Using the data from such manuscripts before they are published is inappropriate. Sharing the data with colleagues is equally inappropriate, as is reproducing the manuscript for any purpose. If reviewers wish to use information from a manuscript that has been accepted for publication, they should ask the Editor to contact the author(s) for permission. Responsibilities and Rights of Peer Reviewers

10. Reviewers who receive invitations to review manuscripts with which they have a clear conflict of interest should decline the invitation and reveal the specific conflict of interest. Conflicts of interest can be defined as sets of conditions (such as academic competition or particular philosophic values and beliefs) that could result in a biased or unfair evaluation of the manuscript. The Editor may deliberately choose a reviewer with a known stance on a particular issue in order to obtain a balanced review of the manuscript. Reviewers who have any questions in this regard should consult with the Editor. • Reviewers who have reviewed a manuscript before for another journal should inform the Editor before they complete the review. The Editor can then decide whether a re-review is appropriate. • Reviewers who receive a request to review a manuscript and cannot do so within the specified time period should decline the request. Responsibilities and Rights of Peer Reviewers (CoNti…)

11. Reviewer panel members are expected to complete 6 to 8 reviews annually and to do so in a timely manner. Those who consistently decline to complete reviews or who do not complete them on time will be asked to leave the Reviewer Panel. • Reviewers who agree to review a manuscript must complete their reviews within the specified time period. If it becomes impossible to complete the review on time, reviewers should so inform the editorial office and ask for guidance about whether to decline to review the manuscript or to take an additional specified period of time. • All reviews panel members and occasional reviewers get scored on both timeliness and quality. • High quality and timely reviews are essential to goal of publishing high quality work in a timely manner. Reviewers who complete high quality reviews in a timely manner are providing an essential service to the field and to the Journal, and they are likely to be asked to review again. Rights • Reviewers can expect to be informed of the Editor's decision regarding manuscripts they reviewed for the Journal. • Reviewers can expect free subscription of the journal. • Reviewers can expect to be thanked for the time they take to review manuscripts. A list of the members of the Editorial Board will be published in each issue of the Journal. Reviewers will be identified in a list of occasional reviewers published in the one of the issue of the publication year. Responsibilities and Rights of Peer Reviewers (CoNti…)

12. Online journal websitewww.idcinternationaljournal.com

18. THANKYOU!