1 / 22

Material Flow Accounting Tools and its contribution for policy making

Technology, Management & Policy Graduate Consortium Annual Meeting June 26-28 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA. Material Flow Accounting Tools and its contribution for policy making. Samuel Niza IN+, IST. * Phd fellow of the Science and Technology Foundation, Portugal.

warner
Download Presentation

Material Flow Accounting Tools and its contribution for policy making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technology, Management & Policy Graduate ConsortiumAnnual MeetingJune 26-28Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge, MA Material Flow Accounting Tools and its contribution for policy making Samuel Niza IN+, IST * Phd fellow of the Science and Technology Foundation, Portugal

  2. Summary • MFA, physical accounting and Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting • MFA use for policy making • MFA and policy making in Portugal • Conclusions

  3. Measuring the material demand of the economy LCA – Life Cycle Analysis MIPS – Material Input per Unit of Service Company-level MFA (Eco-balance, Eco-audits, materials accounting)MFA related methods SFA – Substance Flow Analysis EW-MFA - Economy-wide Material Flow Analysis PIOT – Physical Input-Output Tables EIO-LCA – Environmental Input-Output-based Input/Output related methods Life Cycle Assessment Ecological Footprint Environmental Space Carrying capacity related methods Sustainable Process Index NAMEA – National Accounting Matrix including Environmental AccountsIntegrated methods SEEA – System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting

  4. Physical and economical accounting techniques Adapted from Daniels and Moore, 2002

  5. Economy Metabolism Economy-wide MF balances show: • The composition of the material throughput • The dependence on imports • The physical growth of infrastructures • The quantities of materials released to the environment …and allows static and dynamic evaluation

  6. Economy Metabolism Other than MFA economy-wide acounts: • NAMEA and SEEA require enormous quantities of data ⇒ long longlol~long long time lags in data collection and tables preparation • PIOT and EIO-LCA usually have a restricted coverage of physical inputs and outputs (better suited for sector or activity fields’ IO description) • NAMEA, PIOT and EIO-LCA do not account physical stocks • Just permit static models of the economy

  7. MFA limitations • Not directly correlated with economic data • Does not directly allocates material flows to sectors

  8. Specific characteristics of MFA for policy purposes • Derive material flows indicators • Information/Awareness raising about environmental problems • Monitor the environmental pressure of the economy • Measure the economy metabolism performance

  9. Source: Canas, MOSUS, EUROSTAT DMI, Portugal (1960-2000) Portugal, Metabolic performance trends a) material consumption

  10. Portugal, Metabolic performance trendsb) wastes and emissions

  11. Portugal, Metabolism snapshot Source: Niza & Ferrão calculations Portugal physical metabolism, base year: 2000

  12. Source: INE Source: IGAPHE Source: INE Infrastructural growth

  13. Resource productivity Source: Niza & Ferrão calculations Resource Productivity, EU15 and Portugal (1980-2000)

  14. Portugal metabolism evidences: • An increasingly open economy, exposed to international trade – mainly imports • A clear stake in infrastructural development – physical stock growth • Resource productivity divergence from the EU average • reflects the effort on long term economical return structures

  15. Policy priorities • Policy Target: Resource productivity convergence • Potential for action: • Resource use efficiency growth • Recycling rates growth • Means: • Promotion of business and administration added value (by means of immaterial resources) • Closing of production and consumption cycles

  16. Policy priorities • Some specific actions: • Development of wasteproduction models • Establishment of regulation for construction and demolition wastes with target values for recycling • Approaching the European allotment levels between new buildings construction and buildings rehabilitation • Decrease the strong dependence of energy material-intensive sources (e.g. coal, oil)

  17. Conclusions • MFA temporal resolution and disaggregation capability turns it the method with the greatest potential to characterize an economy metabolism • Portugal material consumption had a significant growth associated to infrastructural development • Competitiveness and sustainability of Portuguese economy calls for RP convergence with EU and • Promotion of business and administration added value by means of immaterial resources • Promotion of production and consumption cycles closing

  18. Thank You!

  19. Overview of the Material flow indicators [based on EUROSTAT, 2001] *In addition, balancing items have to be included: On the input side – oxygen for the combustion of fuels and for the respiration of humans and livestock On the output side – water vapour from the combustion of fuels and water vapour and CO2 from the respiration of humans and livestock

  20. Visual representations of environmental pressure Rucksack Vs. Footprint

  21. Environmental Pressure • MF induces environmental impacts at every stage of production/consumption chain: • Extraction/harvest of primary resources • Covering of nature • Final disposal of residuals

  22. Overview of environmental impacts associated to the use of natural resources Source: Muilerman and Blonk, 2001

More Related