1 / 16

Repositories – Practice & Vision

Repositories – Practice & Vision. Overview 2010. This Talk. Objective Repositories on the Menu 2010 Overview of a highly diversified field as compared to 2005 Coverage selective, subjective, observational, cursory, data-centric Audience addressed

waseem
Download Presentation

Repositories – Practice & Vision

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Repositories – Practice & Vision Overview 2010 << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  2. This Talk • Objective • Repositories on the Menu 2010 • Overview of a highly diversified field as compared to 2005 • Coverage • selective, subjective, observational, cursory, data-centric • Audience addressed • Repository Managers, Information Managers, Funders … • Approach wisdom of crowds • Open Repositories 2010 Conf. assumed as representative • General session themes taken as starting points << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  3. Open Access Policy • Vision: Open Access objectsascommodity • Not an ethicalissue but mostefficientmodeofscholarlyandscientificcommunication • Practice: Considerablegrowth but tedious • More policies (publisher;institutional; funders: EC) • More repositories & documents (cf. BASE/Sherpa) • But systematicinputofdatalacksautomation • Forecast: Further incrementalprogress << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  4. Bibliography & Citation • Vision: R‘sforauthors‘ publicationmanagement • Personal publicationlists & referencemanagement • Practice: Pleasefull-texts – but contextualized • Completionishandwork, augmentedby Web2tools • Citations not in R‘s: GS, WoS, Scopus, PMC, Inspire • Forecast: Completenessisclue • Authorsonlytakeseriousifreallygood << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  5. UsageStatistics • Vision: Scholarlymetric alternative tocitations • Higher precisionandresolution • Also importantfor service optimization„Research Intelligence“ • Practice: Still measured non-standardized • Comparisonandintegrationimpossible • Pilotsunderway: (Cross-)National, EU, Publisher • Forecast: Needs a fewyears but will fly << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  6. Administrative Systems • Vision: Authorsuserepositoriesforreporting • Institionalbibliography, policycompliance • Whyreporttwice? Double-input a „no-go“! • Practice: Cautiousopeningof „official“ systems • Re-use – e.g. alerting – requiresdisambiguation • Reporting needsauthoritativedatapersons, departments… • But: closedshopsand IT-integrationproblemse.g. IDM • Forecast: SuccessforR‘swith CRIS interfaces << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  7. Data Integration & Disambiguation • Vision: Automated exchangeofpublicationdata • Bibliographicdataisalready out there: so re-use! • Practice: Examples? Yes, but few! • FetchofdatafromWoS, ArXiV, PMC: Who doesit? • E.g. Authordisambiguation: „Is Meyer Meyer?“ • Also departments, institutions, classifications • Forecast: (Inter-)National authorityfiles /IDs • Terminologyservicesusedtodisambiguate << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  8. National Approaches • Vision: Institutional>national>global structure • Geographic regime builds on reliable institutions • Practice: Europe strong, but all is still stringy • Some functional chains of comm. OpenAIRE, Japan, China • Disciplinary worlds (and US) work differently • Forecast: Mixed geographic and subject system • Invisible automatic exchange will blur boundaries << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  9. Research Data • Vision: Researchers can easily submit data • Higher transparency, cost-efficiency • But please provide differential access • Practice: Highly heterogeneous over disciplines • E.g. Bioinformatics (~open) & engineering (~closed) • Funders require data management plan • Forecast: Subject based practice dominates • No generic basis as in text-based documents • Only basic archiving may be common denominator << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  10. Digital Preservation & Archiving • Vision: Researchers havetrustedarchives • Particularlyimportantforresearchdata, wherenoest. publishingsystemcan catch thetrust • Practice: Documentsfeasible, Data in question • Manyimportantinsights, but tooambitious • National librariesanddataarchives on themove • Forecast: hot-service ifapproachedpractically • 3-5-10 yearspragmaticpreservation: thenlet‘ssee! • „Whatcanyoupromise?“ vs. „Whatcan‘tbepromised“ << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  11. Repository Platforms • Vision: Solid andsustained multi-purposeR‘s • Research Data and administrative functionality • Developer communitiesgobusiness • Practice: Extension ofexisting, still newcomers • Dspace, Eprints, Fedora, Opus extended • PubMan/eSciDoc, Invenio etc. maturing • „Competition“ from VCSs and Web-CMS? • Forecast: Further consolidation << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  12. Repository Interoperability • Vision: R‘swithmanytentaclesandglands • Bidirectionalinterfacesfordataandprotocols • „Repositoriesaspipelines“ • Practice: OAI-PMH still dominates, otherscome • REST/SOAP, XMLHttpRequest, SWORD, SRU, Feeds, OAI-ORE, Linked Data / RDF: whathaveyougot!? • Forecast: Technology savvystaffrequired • Customizing interfaces not out-of-the-box << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  13. Academic Workflows • Vision: R‘sembedded in researchprocess • Virtual Research Environments: Service mash-ups • Specificityrequirescustomization • Practice: Again, docsfeasible – data in question • Generic: Office, calendar, web-sites, documentation • Specific: Research toolsandworkflows • Forecast: Self-maintainedrepositoryplatforms • Research cultures vs. institutional service dev. • Localtekkiesandcentral service collaboration << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  14. Sustainability & Business Operations • Vision: Balancedpublicand private businesses • Institutionalservicesasbackbonethatsources out • Practice: Libraries dominate – Cloudcomingup • Separation betweenR‘sandpublishersblursslightly • Research dataarchivingpressescomputingcentresfornovelvirtualizationstrategies • Forecast: Mixed institutional & outsourcedop‘s • Goodreasonsforkeepingdataathome will levelwithpriceconsiderationsforcomm. cloudservices << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  15. Repository Infrastructures • Vision: R‘sdatafromthe socket outlet • Researchers andtekkies just havetoplug-in • Practice: R‘s & infrastructuralsystemsconverge • Cautiousattemptstogobeyond OAI-PMH • Links to CRISs anddisciplinarysystems • Infrastructuresallowdataand service mash-ups • Forecast: The contentnetworktightens • R‘swithoutuserinterfaces; R‘sasdataproviders << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

  16. Take Home Message(s) • R‘s 2010 • Are not onlyabout Open Access anymore • Sucsessivepublicationstagesoftexts & researchdata • Extendtowardsadministrationandresearchdata • Bibliographicre-use, Disambiguation/IDs • Are embeddedandembedthemselves • Academic workflows / VREs, Frameworks, Infrastructures • Become an assettvesseloftheinstitution << Repositories – Practice & Vision >> Helmholtz/DINI-Workshop

More Related