1 / 32

AIF FORUM Jun Yin

Anti-Islanding Techniques for Distributed Power Generators. AIF FORUM Jun Yin. Outline . Introduction Review of Anti-Islanding Techniques Islanding Frequency Model & Hidden Gene Principle Proportional Power Spectral Density (PPSD) for Islanding Detection

waseemah
Download Presentation

AIF FORUM Jun Yin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anti-Islanding Techniquesfor Distributed Power Generators AIF FORUM Jun Yin

  2. Outline • Introduction • Review of Anti-Islanding Techniques • Islanding Frequency Model & Hidden Gene Principle • Proportional Power Spectral Density (PPSD) for Islanding Detection • Covariance Index for Islanding Detection • Adaptive Logic Phase Shift (ALPS) and Adaptive Reactive Power Shift (ARPS) Anti-Islanding Algorithm • Hybrid Anti-Islanding Techniques • Conclusion • Questions • References

  3. Introduction Distributed Generation Systems • DG Systems Regional Dispatch Energy Value Information Distribution Substation Transmission Line Smart Controller Communication & Control Links ~ ~ Genset Wind Photovoltaic Micro gas Central Generating Station Distribution Line Town Remote Load Factory

  4. Unintentional islanding is a situation in which local DG systems continue to supply power to the local loads at a sustained voltage and frequency while the main EPS is de-energized unknowingly. • Islanding operation could be fatally harmful to the line workers and power system facilities. • IEEE Std 1547™-2003 and IEEE Std 929-2000 require that islanded DG systems be shut down within a specified time. • Interconnection of Distributed Power Generators with Power System Fig. 1 Interconnection of DG systems with the power system

  5. Review of Anti-Islanding Techniques • Two types of techniques for anti-islanding purpose • Remote techniques: normally used on the utility site. Most of them are based on the communication between utilities and DG units • Power Line Carrier Communication (PLCC) • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Network (SCADA) • Local techniques: used on the DG site. They are based on the information available on the DG site. Two types of local techniques • Passive techniques: Detect abnormalities related to the islanding conditions • Traditional Over/Under Voltage and Over/Under Frequency Protection (OVP/UVP & OFP/UFP) • Rate of Change of Power Output (ROCOP) as an index of islanding • Rate of Change of Frequency (ROCOF) as an index of islanding • Rate of Change of Frequency over Power Change (ROCOFOP) as an index of islanding

  6. Phase Jump Detection (PJD) • Voltage Harmonics Detection (HD) • Active Techniques: introduce disturbance to the DG output for the islanding detection • The Reactive Power Export Error Detection (RPEED) • Impedance Measurement (IM) • Phase Shift (or Frequency Shift) techniques for inverter-based DG systems • Active Frequency Drift (AFD) • Active Frequency Drift with Positive Feedback (AFDPF) • Slip-Mode Frequency Shift (SMS) • Automatic Phase Shift (APS)

  7. General Comparison of Anti-islanding Techniques • Remote Techniques: • Usually do not have non-detection zone (NDZ) • Do not degrade the quality of the generating power of the DG • Effective in multi-DG systems But • too expensive to implement • Complicated communication techniques in multi-DG systems • Local Techniques: • Passive Techniques: • Do not degrade the quality of the power generation of the DG • Inexpensive and easy to implement But • Have relatively large non-detection zone (NDZ) • Effectiveness may be impaired in multi-DG systems • Active Techniques • Relatively small non-detection zone (NDZ) • Inexpensive and easy to implement But • may degrade the quality of the output power and the stability of the DG

  8. Islanding Frequency Model & Hidden Gene Principle • General Aspects of Islanding Operation α < 0 α > 0 Fig. 2 The phase characteristics of the islanding load The relationship between the current period and the voltage period in islanding operation (1)

  9. Hidden Gene Principle & Islanding • A 4th order moving average filter is embedded as a hidden gene into the inverter’s frequency controller • The islanding frequency model Fig. 3 Islanding frequency model • It has been proven that the stable region for islanding operation is (2)

  10. The Frequency Response of The System Fig. 4 System model for response to disturbance and noise Fig. 5 Bode plot of system transfer function

  11. Fig. 6 Frequency response to disturbance and noise

  12. Proportional Power Spectral Density (PPSD) for Islanding Detection • The definition of the PPSD (3) The signal energy is given by (4) The proportional Power Spectral Density (5)

  13. Comparison of PPSD of voltage periods in grid-connected and islanding operation Fig. 7 Period variation in grid-connected operation. Fig. 8 PPSD of voltage periods in grid-connected operation Fig. 9 Period variation in islanding operation Fig. 10 PPSD of voltage periods in islanding operation

  14. The Proportional Energy Fig. 11 A lab testing system for single phase islanding operation Fig. 12 Proportional energy in frequency band from radian

  15. 5kW Single-Phase Inverter

  16. The Lab Test System forSingle Phase Islanding Operation

  17. Fig. 13 Covariance in grid-connected operation Fig. 14 Covariance in islanding operation • Covariance Index for Islanding Detection • Comparison of covariance function in grid-connected operation and islanding operation • Proposed covariance estimator • the covariance between the current command periods and the actual voltage periods can be taken as a significant islanding indicator (6)

  18. Fig. 15 A lab testing systemforthree phase islanding operation Fig. 16 Covariance changes during islanding operation

  19. Adaptive Logic Phase Shift (ALPS) or Adaptive Reactive Power Shift (ARPS) Algorithm • Slip-Mode Shift As a Basic Phase Shift Fig. 17 SMS phase shift

  20. Probability of suspicious islanding The probability of or Is greater than 0.6 • Additional Phase Shift is added • Reference Period (or Frequency) Stop and Resume Criteria

  21. Hybrid Anti-Islanding Algorithms • A hybrid of passive and active algorithms is to use passive islanding indicators such as PPSD and covariance to activate the active anti-islanding techniques such as ALPS and ARPS to move the frequency into the UFP/OFP trip window. The goal of this hybrid anti-islanding algorithm is to robustly trip the islanding operation while maintain a zero or the least disturbance in grid-connected operation.

  22. The flowchart of hybrid anti-islanding

  23. Lab Testing Results Fig. 18 Lab testing system for hybrid anti-islanding algorithm

  24. (1) Covariance changes after islanding operation (2) Probability of Cause and Effect after islanding operation (3) Additional D-axis current after islanding operation (4) Total D-axis current after islanding operation

  25. (5) Period shift after the islanding operation Fig. 19 Lab tests for hybrid anti-islanding algorithm

  26. 30kW Three Phase SVPWM Inverter System

  27. The Lab Test System for Three-Phase Islanding Operation

  28. Three-Phase Islanding Load

  29. Conclusion • A hidden gene concept is introduced in islanding detection • Proportional power spectral density of voltage periods can be used as a distinct islanding indicator • The effectiveness of the covariance islanding indicator is proved • ALPS and ARPS active anti-islanding algorithms are proposed • Hybrid of passive and active anti-islanding techniques can provide a way to robustly trip the islanding operation while maintain a zero or the least disturbance in grid-connected operation.

  30. Questions ??? Suggestions……

  31. [1] L. Chang, C. Diduch, and P. Cusack, “Development of standards for interconnecting distributed generators with electric power systems,” IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Power Engineering, Montreal, May, 2003. [2] IEEE, Standard 1547™, Standard for Interconnecting Distributed Resources with Electric Power Systems, June 2003. [3] IEEE, Standard 929-2000, IEEE Recommended Practice for Utility Interface of Photovoltaic (PV) Systems, 2000. [4] J. Yin, L. Chang and C. Diduch, “Recent developments in islanding detection for distributed power generation,” in Proc. Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering, July 28-30, 2004, pp. 124-128. [5] R. M. Rifaat, “Critical considerations for utility/cogeneration inter-tie protection scheme configuration,” IEEE Trans. Industry Applications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 973-977, Sep./Oct. 1995. [6] M. E. Ropp, M. Begovic, A. Rohatgi, G. A. Kern, R. H. Bonn, Sr., and S. Gonzalez, “Determining the relative effectiveness of islanding detection methods using phase criteria and non-detection zones,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 290-296, Sept. 2000. [7] W. BOWER and M. ROPP, “Evaluation of islanding detection methods for photovoltaic utility-interactive power systems,” Report IEA PVPS T5-09: 2002. [8] J. Warin and W. H. Allen, “Loss of mains protection,” ERA Conference on Circuit Protection for Industrial and Commercial Installations, London, UK, pp. 4.3.1-12, 1990. [9] M. A. Refern, O. Usta, and G. Fielding, “Protection against loss of utility grid supply for a dispersed storage and generation unit,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 948-954, July 1993. [10] M. A. Redfern, J. I. Barrett, and O. Usta, “A new microprocessor based islanding protection algorithm for dispersed storage and generation units,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1249-1254, July 1995. [11] F. Pai and S. Huang, “A detection algorithm for islanding-prevention of dispersed consumer-owned storage and generating units,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 346-351, Dec. 2001. [12] W. Freitas, W. Xu, C. M. Affonso and Z. Huang, “Comparative Analysis Between ROCOF and Vector Surge Relays for Distributed Generation Applications,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1315-1324, Apr. 2005. [13] P. O’Kane and B. Fox, “Loss of mains detection for embedded generation by system impedance monitoring,” Development in Power System Protection, 25-27th March 1997, Conference Publication No. 434, IEE 1997, pp.95-98. [14] M. Sumner, B. Palethorpe, D. W. P. Thomas, P. Zanchetta, and M. C. D. Piazza, “A technique for power supply harmonic impedance estimation using a controlled voltage disturbance,” IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 207-215, Mar. 2002. • References:

  32. [15] M. E. Ropp, “Design Issue for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System,” PhD., Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 1998. [16] G. A. Kern, “SunSine300: Utility interactive AC module anti-islanding test results,” in Proc. 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., pp. 1265-1268, 1997. [17] M. E. Ropp, M. Begovic, A. Rohatgi, “Analysis and performance assessment of the active frequency drift method of islanding prevention,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 810-816, Sept. 1999. [18] G. Hung, C. Chang, and C. Chen, “Automatic phase-shift method for islanding detection of grid-connected photovoltaic inverter,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 169-173, Mar. 2003. [19] Z. Ye, R. Walling, L. Garces, R. Zhou, L. Li, and T. Wang, “Study and Development of Anti-Islanding Control for Grid-Connected Inverters,” Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/SR-560-36243, May 2004. [20] V. John, Z. Ye, and A. Kolwalkar, “Investigation of anti-islanding protection of power converter based distributed generators using frequency domain analysis,” IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1177-1183, Sept. 2000. [21] J. Yin, L. Chang and C. Diduch, “A new adaptive logic phase-shift algorithm for anti-islanding protections in inverter-based DG systems,” IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference 2005, Recife, Brazil, June 13-16, 2005, pp. 231-236.

More Related