190 likes | 203 Views
This research study delves into the behavior and characteristics of plasma dynamics and charging in a single nozzle ion head. Detailed observations on micro-Dielectric Barrier Discharges (mDBD), current extraction, and model descriptions are explored, alongside factors such as mDBD scaling, sustained plasma in N2 at 1 atm, electron current extraction concerning RF frequencies, charge per pulse, pulse number, dielectric constant impact, and concluding remarks. The study discusses the significance of microplasma stamps, scaling of micro-DBDs, and the importance of electron extraction dynamics. Detailed modeling platforms and simulations are highlighted, focusing on secondary electrons from surfaces and mDBD geometry. The study emphasizes the experimental setup and outcomes in a controlled environment, shedding light on the behavior of plasma in various scenarios.
E N D
PLASMA DYNAMICS AND CHARGING CHARACTERISTIC OF A SINGLE NOZZLE ION HEAD Jun-Chieh Wanga) Napoleon Leonib), Henryk Bireckib), Omer Gilab), and Mark J. Kushnera) a)University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA mjkush@umich.edu, junchwan@umich.edu b)Hewlett Packard Research Labs, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA napoleon.j.leoni@hp.com, henryk.birecki@hp.com, omer_gila@hp.com NIP-28 September 9-13 2012 * Work supported by Hewlett Packard Research Labs
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. AGENDA • Introduction to micro-Dielectric Barrier Discharges (mDBD) • Current extraction • Description of model • mDBD Scaling • mDBD sustained in N2 (1 atm) • Electron current extraction vs rf frequencies • Charge per pulse and pulse number vs frequencies • Electron current extraction vs dielectric constant • Concluding Remarks NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. DIELECTRIC BARRIER DISCHARGES • The plasma in DBDs is sustained between parallel electrodes of which one (or both) is covered by a dielectric. • When the plasma is initiated, the underlying dielectric is electrically charged, removing voltage from the gap. • The plasma is terminated when the gap voltage falls below the self-sustaining value and so preventing arcing. • On the following half cycle, a more intense electron avalanche occurs due to the higher voltage across the gap from previously charged dielectric. • http://www.calvin.edu/~mwalhout/discharge.htm NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. MICRO-DBDs • Microplasmas (10s to 100s m) are interesting for planar current sources due to the ability of fabricating large arrays. • Non-arcing, micro-DBDs (mDBDs) using rf voltages are attractive for these arrays due to inexpensive mass production or area-selective modification. • “Microplasma stamps” based on mDBDs are applied to area-selective surface modification at atmospheric pressure. Ref: J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 194012 (2008) NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. SCALING OF MICRO-DBDs • At atmospheric pressure, plasma formation and decay times can be a few ns whereas the rf period is 10s to 100s ns – the mDBD may need to be re-ignited with each cycle. • Electron extraction from the mDBD may require a third electrode and so the structure, electron emitting properties and dynamics are important to the operation. • We have computationally investigated the extraction of electron current from mDBDs: • Frequency • rf voltage • Material properties NIP28_2012
Gas Phase Plasma Plasma Hydrodynamics Poisson’s Equation Liquid Phase Plasma Bulk Electron Energy Transport Kinetic “Beam” Electron Transport Surface Chemistry and Charging Neutral Transport Navier-Stokes Neutral and Plasma Chemistry Ion Monte Carlo Simulation University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. MODEL: nonPDPSIM • 2-unstructured mesh with spatial dynamic range of 104. • Fully implicit plasma transport. • Time slicing algorithms between plasma and fluid timescales. Radiation Transport Circuit Model NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. MODELING PLATFORM: nonPDPSIM • Poisson’s equation: • Transport of charged and neutral species: • Surface Charge: • Electron Temperature (transport coefficient obtained from Boltzmann’s equation) • Radiation transport and photoionization: NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. SECONDARY ELECTRONS FROM SURFACES • An electron Monte Carlo Simulation is used to follow trajectories of secondary electrons from surfaces. • Structured EMCS mesh overlayed onto unstructured fluid mesh – E-fields interpolated onto mesh. • Pseudo-particles are launched from sites on surfaces for emission produced by • Ion bombardment • Photon fluxes • Electric field enhanced thermionic emission. NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. mDBD GEOMETRY • The mDBD is a “sandwich” cylindrical geometry. • rf electrode buried in printed-circuit-board • Grounded electrode separated from rf by dielectric sheet – 35 m hole. • Biased extraction electrode across a gap of 500 m • rf: 1.4 kV at 2.5-25 MHz. • Extraction: 2 kV, ballasted (Rb= 100 kΩ) to prevent arcing or run away current NIP28_2012
MINMAX University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. 20 MHz N2 (1 atm): SURFACE CHARGE, [e] [e] (2x1015 cm-3, 5 dec) [e] (2x1015 cm-3, 5 dec) • (-2x1016~2x1016 cm-3) • Vrf= 1.4 kV, 20 MHz, 2 kV bias and ballast resistor 100 kΩ • Vrf=+1.4 kV: Electrons starts to be extracted out of cavity. • Vrf= 0: Top electrode extracts electrons. Avalanches in depleted cavity. • Vrf=-1.4 kV: Positively charged dielectric reduces voltage drop. • Vrf= 0: E-plume extinguishes. e-flux neutralizes positively charged dielectric. NIP28_2012 Animation Slide-GIF
MINMAX University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. 20 MHz N2 (1 atm): E/N, Te, Se+ Ssec • [Se+ Ssec](3x1024 cm-3 s-1,3dec) Te (0.1~15 eV) • E/N (40~4000Td) • Larger E/N occurs at Vrf zero-crossing due to previously charging of dielectric. Te and Se follow E/N. • Ionizations due to secondary “beam” electrons at surface seeded by positive ions and UV photons from long lived N2 excited states are commensurate with bulk ionization. • Conductive plasma shields out electric field and lowers E/N which reduces ionization in the cavity. NIP28_2012 Animation Slide-GIF
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. ELECTRON CURRENT EXTRACTION vs FREQUENCY 20MHz 10MHz • Peak currents at top electrode tend to increase with increasing frequency. • Pre-pulse and single main pulse at higher frequencies, multiple pulses at lower frequencies. • Longer periods allow periodic bursts of ionization in the mDBD cavity, launching new pulses. rf Voltage Top Electrode Current 5MHz 2.5MHz • Vrf = 1.4 kV, 20-2.5 MHz,2 kV bias, 100 kΩ ballast resistor NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. ELECTRON CURRENT EXTRACTION vs FREQUENCY • 2.5 MHz, Experiment • 2.5 MHz, Simulation • Simulation shows good agreement with experiments. • The multiple pulsing may transition between 2 and 3 peaks (or more) as discharge conditions evolve in the gap. NIP28_2012
MINMAX University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. 2.5 MHz N2 (1 atm): SURFACE CHARGE, [e] [e] (5x1015 cm-3, 8 dec) [e] (5x1015 cm-3, 8 dec) • (-3x1016~3x1016 cm-3) • Vrf= 1.4 kV, 2.5 MHz, 2 kV bias and ballast resistor 100 kΩ • Vrf=+1.4 kV: Dielectric charged negatively. Electron plume starts to be extracted. • Vrf=0: Avalanche has occurred. 1st E-plume has been extracted. E/N increases. • Vrf=-1.4 kV: 2 pulses extracted due to the periodic burst of ionization. • Vrf= 0: E-flux neutralizes positively charged dielectric. NIP28_2012 Animation Slide-GIF
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. CHARGE COLLECTION vs. TIME • Charge collection as a function of time increases at higher frequency due to higher repetition rate. • Charge collection is limited by short rf period and capacitance of underlying dielectric. Charge/pulse is not a strong function of frequencies. • Vrf = 1.4 kV, 25-2.5 MHz,2 kV bias, 100 kΩ ballast resistor NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. CHARGE COLLECTION vs. TIME • Charge collection increases with rf voltage due to the higher ionization rate in the mDBD cavity. • The larger plasma density in the cavity is extracted as a more dense plume. • Vrf = 1.4-5.6 kV, 25 MHz,2 kV bias, 100 kΩ ballast resistor NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. CURRENT EXTRACTION vs DIELECTRIC CONSTANT 25MHz 20MHz εr=10 20 • Charging of the insulator in part controls current collection on the top electrode. • Larger dielectric constant of the insulator allows larger current collection. • This effect is not linear with . 10MHz 15MHz • Vrf = 1.4 kV, 25-10 MHz, 2 kV bias, 100 kΩ ballast resistor NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. CHARGE COLLECTION vs. TIME • Since the intervening dielectric acts as a capacitor, its charging characteristics scale with εr. The surface charge required to charge the dielectric to the voltage increase linearly with εr • Charge collection increases with increasing capacitance of dielectric. • Vrf = 1.4, 25 MHz,2 kV bias, 100 kΩ ballast resistor, εr=2-20 NIP28_2012
University of Michigan Institute for Plasma Science & Engr. CONCLUDING REMARKS • First principles computer modeling has been applied to investigation of single nozzle ion head in electrographic printing. • Peak currents collected at top electrode (2.5-25MHz) tend to increase with frequency. • More current pulses per rf cycle at lower frequency due to periodic burst of ionization in the mDBD cavity. • Charge collection as a function of time increases with rf frequencies, voltages and capacitance of dielectric. • The current increases with increasing dielectric constant of insulator. NIP28_2012