1 / 31

Vicious and Virtuous Cycles

The Lifelong Impact of Early Adversity – and How to Break the Cycle Daniel P. Keating University of Michigan Brief Version for CASA Institute October 2018 Dallas, Texas. Vicious and Virtuous Cycles.

wbutler
Download Presentation

Vicious and Virtuous Cycles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Lifelong Impact of Early Adversity – and How to Break the CycleDaniel P. KeatingUniversity of MichiganBrief Version for CASA InstituteOctober 2018Dallas, Texas

  2. Vicious and Virtuous Cycles • To interrupt vicious cycles (or reinforce virtuous cycles) we need to deeply understand how they work • The links in such cycles represent transition points where potential change is most possible – each offers an intervention, prevention or policy opportunity • These are shown as the arrows in the next slides

  3. St. Martin’s Press, April 2017

  4. The Vicious Cycle of Early Adversity

  5. Resilience RequiresBreaking a Vicious Cycle • Bad news is that the dynamic nature of cycles tends to lock them in place, so focusing on only one transition point may have limited effects on interrupting the cycle. • Good news is that by understanding the full cycle, we can: • Identify numerous opportunities for policy, prevention, and intervention • Link emerging science to these opportunities at multiple levels

  6. Decades of Research Show That Early Adversity Has a Lifelong Impact • “Barker hypothesis” linking suboptimal intra-uterine growth to midlife caridovascular disease (~1990) • Marmot’s work linking lower social status (in UK civil service) to increased health problems and many diseases • Link and Phelan: Social conditions as “fundamental causes” of disease • Hertzman and Power’s work with 1958 UK birth cohort linking family of origin socioeconomic status (SES) to developmental health outcomes into adulthood • Felitti’s Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) retrospective questionnaire linking U.S. population health outcomes to cumulative risk factors in early life

  7. Social Epidemiology of Adverse Childhood Experiences

  8. BUT WHY?Let’s Look Closely at the Cycle “Getting under the skin”

  9. Major Pathways for “Getting Under the Skin” • Brains “listen to the environment”: • Neural sculpting/synaptic pruning, with early foundations especially important with life course consequences • Adolescence is a second critical period for brain development • Genes also “listen to the environment”: epigenetic modification of gene expression • Also an early life effects bias, with life course consequences • And considerable potential for transgenerational transmission via biological inheritance – an enduring population burden

  10. One Example of the Next Step in the Cycle Focus: NR3C1 methylation

  11. Stress Dysregulation (SDR) • Stress system essential for survival, highly preserved across many species • Excess or “toxic” stress levels during pregnancy or during an infant’s first year of life can trigger this epigenetic change • An environmental “signal” that it’s a dangerous environment, so vigilance is advised: • “Live fast, live hard, as you are likely to die young!”

  12. “Supernurturing” an SDR Infant • For multiple reasons, infants may have the SDR pattern • High stress pregnancy • Epigenetic inheritance • Genetic vulnerability • High stress in early infancy • Sustained and persistent positive interactions can create resilience or even reversals • Suomi’s work with peer-reared and/or genetically vulnerable infant monkeys shows the benefit, and even turn-around

  13. Challenges and Approaches for “Supernurturing” • Parents (who themselves may have high stress and/or SDR) will not be getting the positive reinforcement of being able to soothe their baby in a regular fashion – including less of the positive neurochemical oxytocin response • Supports for parents to provide respite/ help • Avoid/ challenge the “blame game” • Co-parenting wherever it is (or could be made) available • “Alloparenting” (Hrdy’s term) from extended family or others – a Homo sapiens competitive advantage • Programs to provide support through high quality child care, home visiting, Early Head Start, and others

  14. The Cycle Continues Affects behavior and health over time

  15. SDR Consequences • Internal feelings of anxiety, stress, agitation, being overwhelmed • Expression varies across development • Can be expressed as fight or flight, acting out or withdrawing, or both in rapid succession • Associated with externalizing and internalizing symptomatology and diagnoses • Can also affect learning and cognitive development, via attention and emotion regulation pathways

  16. Stress Related Diseases and Disorders • “Allostatic load” over a lifetime leads to multiple health problems • McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 840, 33–44. • McEwen, B. S., Nasca, C., & Gray, J. D. (2016). Stress effects on neuronal structure: Hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews, 41, 3–23. • SES or ACE are the stress patterns most often studied, but the social gradient indicates that this stress can occur at any level of SES (though with decreasing probability)

  17. Evidence-Based IndividualPathways to Resilience • Social connection • Support and nurturance • Biological counteragents (oxytocin, serotonin) • Note: Harder for SDR individuals to achieve • Mindfulness based stress reduction • Focus on present, not rumination nor fear of future • Observed brain changes • Taking care of the body • Physical exercise • Avoidance of unhealthy habits that can reduce cortisol and/or provide temporary relief (“comfort foods”, alcohol, other drugs) • Sleep hygiene (red flag risk in adolescence!)

  18. No Magic Bullets • Resilience after early adversity remains a minority percentage, even with interventions • Pathways are harder for those with SDR, at any age • Changing the stress physiology later in development is difficult to impossible, but mitigation and work-arounds change the impact • Points toward the need for systemic social and community changes that interrupt the cycle at the start

  19. The Cycle Social Inequality in DH Effects

  20. A Stress Epidemic • CDC data on increases from about 1980 to recently in stress-related disorders and diseases (metabolic, obesity, diabetes, sleep) in the 20% to 25% range • Self-reported health shows a related pattern, but increasingly for younger cohorts • A parallel increase in physiological stress load

  21. Stress Load • Effects are seen not only in expressed diseases and self-reported health • But also as changes in physiological “stress load index” over the same time period • Similar inequality in this stress load index

  22. Population Developmental Health: International Comparisons • Social gradients are a consistent pattern across (WEIRD) societies on all DH outcomes • But steepness of social gradients does not reflect inevitability: population developmental health differences by country* • This pattern tells us that it is possible to do better • It is clear that we should all care, because it affects all of us: it operates at a population level (not just a threshold, poverty issue) • The same basic pattern for multiple DH outcomes, with “social resilience” at the country level across these outcomes *Keating, D., Siddiqi, A., & Nguyen, Q. (2013).National Differences in Population Health and Development. In Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era (2013), edited by P. Hall and M. Lamont. Cambridge University Press.

  23. Why Do Nations Differ? • Note: the patterns of inequality that are linked to population DH outcomes persist over time and across outcomes: • Income Inequality • Human Development Investment • “Collective Imaginary” • “Rights” versus charity/free riding (Justice) • “Investment” versus unearned/undeserved benefits (Utilitarian)

  24. The Cycle Gets Ready to Repeat High Ambient Stress > Parental Challenges to Nurturing

  25. Stress Affects Nurturing • Workplace stress increases, in part because it is physiologically contagious • Work stress is carried into family stress via contagion • Steep inequality increases stress • At lower end, resource concerns re housing, food, employment • At middle and higher end, worries about “losing” what one has, and/or children’s future prospects • Exacerbated in a fearful political climate (health insurance, deportation, etc.) • “Status” inequality as “loss”: Case & Deaton observations on white working class increased mortality

  26. Policies to Support Parents • Workplace flexibility for expectant mothers • Workplace civility approaches that help everyone • Parental leave policies that protect income and career • Home visiting and other supports for all, but especially for at-risk parents • Supports from primary health care providers, an existing institutional point of contact in infancy

  27. The Cycle Completing the Cycle: Multiple Pathways

  28. “All Hands on Deck” • Like all dynamic systems, this cycle tends to be highly stable, pulled back to the central dynamic by multiple, linked forces • Interrupting the cycle and moving to a more virtuous cycle thus requires pressing strongly on all available opportunities for resilience • Policies, practices, prevention, intervention • Especially helpful is when there is coordination and integration across the various groups who have responsibilities for different sectors and institutions: resource efficient and more likely to alter the system

  29. Challenging But Not Hopeless • Contemporary international comparisons show that steep inequality, and its consequences for population developmental health, are not inevitable – “high resilience” countries • Work by Steven Pinkerand others shows considerable progress over long historical time(decreased violence, increased likelihood of dying from natural causes, etc.) • But progress is also not guaranteed – regression is also possible, thus complacency is unwarranted

More Related