1 / 10

Correcting Parallax Errors to Improve Femoral Component Rotation in Knee Replacement

Correcting Parallax Errors to Improve Femoral Component Rotation in Knee Replacement. Simon Talbot , Pandelis Dimitriou , Michael Mullen, Ross Radic , Rachel Zordan , John Bartlett. Whiteside’s Line. Sulcus Line. Sulcus Line. Whiteside’s Line. Mean 0.3° ER SD 2.7°*

webb
Download Presentation

Correcting Parallax Errors to Improve Femoral Component Rotation in Knee Replacement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Correcting Parallax Errors to Improve Femoral Component Rotation in Knee Replacement Simon Talbot, PandelisDimitriou, Michael Mullen, Ross Radic, Rachel Zordan, John Bartlett info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  2. Whiteside’s Line info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  3. Sulcus Line info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  4. Sulcus Line Whiteside’s Line • Mean 0.3° ER • SD 2.7°* • Range -4.9° to +4.7° • Outliers 32% • Mean 1.8° IR • SD 4.2°* • Range -11.8° to +7.8° • Outliers 43% *(F=5.82, p=0.017) info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  5. Coronal Axis of the Sulcus LineCAxSL CAXSL – Mean 0.4° varus, SD 3.8°, 9.4° varus to 7.3° valgus info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  6. Consequences • Parallax error explains variability in WL • Parallax error causes inaccuracy when referencing the trochlear groove in: - Computer navigation, average error 1°, up to 3.4° - PSI planning, average error 2.7°, up to 10.4° info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  7. T piece info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  8. TAG video info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  9. Femoral Malrotation Rates Note: *significant at p≤ .05 info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

  10. Conclusions • Trochlear groove has a variable coronal alignment • Sulcus Line is not Whiteside’s Line • SL is more accurate than WL by removing parallax • Parallax error effects CAS and PSI planning • Trochlear Alignment Guide (TAG) removes errors • Combine SL and PCA for greater accuracy The author declares that a conflict of interest exists in respect of this work owing to ownership of a patent info@simontalbot.com.au, EFORT 2014

More Related