1 / 16

Regulatory Platforms for CO2 trading regulation

Regulatory Platforms for CO2 trading regulation. Last Week Discussion of Agencies, Purpose and How Operate that may be in charge of Carbon Trading at the US Federal Level CFTC, FERC, SEC? Really two (3?) separate components Primary, Secondary. Last Week. Particular Focus on CFTC

wenda
Download Presentation

Regulatory Platforms for CO2 trading regulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regulatory Platforms for CO2 trading regulation • Last Week Discussion of Agencies, Purpose and How Operate that may be in charge of Carbon Trading at the US Federal Level • CFTC, FERC, SEC? • Really two (3?) separate components • Primary, Secondary

  2. Last Week • Particular Focus on CFTC • Control of Market Manipulation • Focus of Concern in Carbon Trading • Secondary Market

  3. Primary Market • Definition • Allocation • Monitoring for Fraud • Enforcement – Surrender of Allowances

  4. Focused on Federal Agencies • But Could it be Accomplished by Private Sector? – Definition, Monitoring

  5. Environmental Protection Agency • Created by the CAA 1970 • Rulemaking/ Implementation • Monitoring • Enforcement • With States – Joint Federalism

  6. EPA and SO2 • Legislation • Implementation • History

  7. Legislation • Permanent Cap on SO2 emissions that may be emitted nationwide at about 50% of 1980 total (by 2008 and thereafter). • Two phases – phase I – 1995; phase II- 2000 • Phase I – 263 units at 110 highest emitting facilties • Allocated for free based on emission rate of 1.20 lb/MMbtu and historic utilization

  8. Legislation cont. • Phase II – added 3,456 units • Allocations under phase II effectively halved • Some allowances held back for auction – 5% for new sources • Early reduction credits if reduce beyond what was required in compliance section\ • Allowances for other uses (renewable energy, etc. . . ) • Banking allowed

  9. Tracking • 40 CFR 73.30, 73.31, 73.32 • Tracking System • Accounts • Alternate account representative • Can be bought by anyone in the primary market

  10. Penalties • $2000/ton, adjusted for inflation from 1990 dollars assessed for excess emissions • In 2007, $3,042/ton

  11. History • 35% reduction in SO2 from 1990 to 2005 • In 2005, 9.5 million new allowances granted • Between 1995-2004, sources had emitted less than their allowances, so there were an additional 6.8 million unused allowances available • Thus, 16.4 million SO2 allowances available for 2005 or any year thereafter • In 2005 sources emitted 10.2 million tons, subtracting from the surplus

  12. Market Activity • In 2005, nearly 5,700 private SO2 allowance transfers involving 19.9 million allowances recorded in the EPA’s tracking system • After initiation, price dropped from $400+ to ~$175 • 2004/2005 reaction to future emission reduction by CAIR; $700 - $1,550… • Why? What would be reduced • Back to $600 at end of June 2006

  13. Monitoring • Each Affected Source (those that must surrender emissions allowances at the end of the year) must have continuous emissions monitoring

  14. Trading and The Market • EPA delegated authority to conduct auction and trades to the Chicago Board of Trade • But trades can occur privately • CFTC has jurisdiction over trading in the SO2 futures market (without explicit legislative authority) • The EPA did not have allowance and tracking program ready when first sales and auction with through.

  15. RGGI Auction • RGGI representatives emphasize need for market monitor – fair, transparent, competitive

  16. RGGI Auction Results 16

More Related