300 likes | 451 Views
The Search for Tidal Disruption Flares with with GALEX. Suvi Gezari California Institute of Technology & The GALEX Team California Institute of Technology, Laboratoire Astrophysique de Marseille Xi’an AGN 2006 -- October 21, 2006. Outline Capability of GALEX to Study Variability
E N D
The Search for Tidal Disruption Flares withwith GALEX Suvi Gezari California Institute of Technology & The GALEX Team California Institute of Technology, Laboratoire Astrophysique de Marseille Xi’an AGN 2006 -- October 21, 2006
Outline Capability of GALEX to Study Variability Tidal Disruption Flares: Theory and Observations Searching for Flares with GALEX Tidal Disruption Flare Discovered Future Dedicated Time Domain Survey
Capabilities of GALEX • Deep Imaging Survey, 80 deg2, >30 ksec (mlim ~ 25) • Observations obtained in 1.5 ksec eclipses • Time-tagged photon data (time resolution of 5 msec) • Large field of view (1.2 sq. deg.) and a large survey volume • Low sky background (source detection with 10 photons) • Simultaneous NUV (1750 - 2750 Å) and FUV (1350 - 1750 Å) imaging • Simultaneous R=100/200 NUV/FUV spectroscopic grism data GALEX SDSS
Tidal Disruption Events A star will be disrupted when: Rp < RT ≈ R(MBH/M)1/3 Evans & Kochanek (1989) The bound fraction (< 0.5) of the stellar debris falls back onto the black hole, resulting in a luminous accretion flare.
Properties of a Tidal Disruption Flare • For 106 - 108 M black holes, the stellar debris accretes in a thick disk (Ulmer 1999) • Lflare≈LEdd=1.31045 M7 erg s-1 • Teff≈(LEdd/4RT2)1/4=3105 M71/12 K • L(t)=(dM/dt)c2t-5/3 • dN/dt7/2MBH-1MBH-1/4≈10-4 yr-1 (Wang & Merritt 2004) Tidal disruption theory predicts rare but luminous flares that peak in the UV/X-ray domain, with decay timescales ~ months. t-5/3 Evans & Kochanek (1989)
Why Search For Tidal Disruption Events? • They are an unambiguous probe for supermassive black holes lurking in the nuclei of normal galaxies. • The luminosity, temperature, and decay of the flare is dependent on the mass and spin of the black hole. • They may contribute to black hole growth over cosmic times, and the faint end of the AGN luminosity function. • Tidal disruption rates are sensitive to the structure and dynamics of the stellar galaxy nucleus.
Flares Detected by ROSAT The ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) conducted in 1990-1991 was an excellent experiment to detect TDEs since it sampled 3x105 galaxies in the soft X-ray band (0.1 - 2.4 keV). • Tbb = 6 - 12 x 105 K • Lx = 1042 - 1044 ergs s-1 • tflare ~ months • Event rate ≈ 1 x 10-5 yr-1 (Donley et al. 2002) NLSy1 Sy1.9 non- active Properties of a tidal disruption event!
Halpern, Gezari, & Komossa (2004) HST Chandra STIS Lflare/L10yr = 240 Follow-up narrow-slit HST/STIS spectra confirmed the galaxies as non-active (Gezari et al. 2003). Lflare/L10yr = 1000 STIS Lflare/L10yr = 6000
NGC 5905 Halpern, Gezari, & Komossa (2004) Gezari et al. (2003) • Narrow-line emission requires excitation by a persistent Seyfert nucleus. • Seyfert nucleus in it inner 0.”1 was previously masked by H II regions in ground-based spectra • The Chandra upper-limit on the nuclear X-ray luminosity is consistent with the predicted Lx from L(H) for LLAGNs, of ~ 9 x 1038 ergs s-1. Li et al. (2002) modeled the event as the partial stripping of a low-mass star, or the disruption of a brown dwarf or giant planet.
Search for Flares in the Deep Imaging Survey TOO observations with Chandra and Keck will probe the early-phase of decay of TDEs for the first time! We take advantage of the UV sensitivity, temporal sampling, and large survey volume of GALEX.
Selection of Variable Sources is a measure of the dispersion in mag due to photometric errors
Identify the Host of the Flare Followed-up with TOO optical spectroscopy • Optically unresolved oOptically resolved • x Xray detection • Optically variable Spectroscopic AGN Stars Quasars Galaxies CFHTLS Colors & Morphology The most convincing candidates have inactive galaxy hosts!
Some hosts show AGN activity Seyfert at z = 0.355! Jan 2006 MDM 2.4m spectrum L([O III]) = 9.4x1040 ergs s-1 Archival Chandra ACIS detection in April 2002 with Lx ≈ 9.3x1042 ergs s-1 Presence of persistent Seyfert activity makes the tidal disruption scenario difficult to prove.
Confirmed Inactive Galaxy Host AEGIS DEEP2 Keck Spectrum Gezari et al. 2006, in press Early-type galaxy with no evidence of Seyfert activity!
UV Flare with t-5/3 Decay The delay between tD and the peak of the flare implies MBH > 108 M. tD t-5/3 Gezari et al. 2006, in press
Simultaneous SED of the Flare GALEX Properties of the Flare: T = 1 to 5 x 105 K L = 1044 to 1046 erg s-1 Macc > 0.3 Msun In excellent agreement with theoretical predictions for a stellar disruption flare. Chandra (AEGIS) CFHT SNLS Gezari et al. 2006, in press Strongest empirical evidence for a stellar disruption event to date!
Disruption of a Star by a Spinning Black Hole Constraints on MBH: MBH(t0-tD) > 1 x 108 Msun MBH() ~ 1+1-.5 x 109 Msun Critical upper limit on MBH for RT > Rs: Mcrit = 1 x 108 Msun (no spin) Mcrit = 8 x 108 Msun (O5 star) Mcrit = 8 x 108 Msun (with spin) Upper limit on MBH for RBB > Rms: RBB < 4 x 1013 cm Rms = 6Rg (no spin) Rms Rg (with spin) If MBH > 108 Msun then RBB < 6Rg, and the black hole must have spin!
New Confirmed Flare from Inactive Galaxy TOO VLT Spectrum courtesy of Stephane Basa z = 0.32 2004.6 2004.9 No Seyfert emission lines! Awaiting results from Chandra TOO!
Dedicated Time Domain Survey • First time domain survey in UV • Designed to complement future ground-based TDS (PanStarrs, LSST) • All time-domain products, notably variable object alerts, will be immediately made public for community follow-up • Produce automated pipeline triggers to generate IAU and/or GCN circulars • Prevalence of UV-bright early evolution of flaring objects • The TDS may detect: supernovae, gamma-ray faint bursts, novae, macronovae, magnetic degenerate binaries, low mass x-ray binaries, chromospherically active stars, QSOs and AGNs, pulsating degenerates, luminous blue variables
Candidate in D4 2003 2005
CFHT SNLS courtesy of Stephane Basa Galaxy Host Le Phare photo-z fits an elliptical galaxy at z=0.56 FUVflare=22.9 2004.4 2006.0 • Chandra TOO X-ray observation in May 8, 2006 does not have a soft blackbody temperature. • Follow-up spectrum of a ROSAT candidate also showed hard X-ray spectrum. • Awaiting results from VLT optical spectrum. Flare SED T = 5 x 105 K
Image Subtraction Method: 1) Register images using a list of point source positions in both images. 2) Subtract second image from reference image after polynomial spatial warping. 3) Search difference image for sources above a threshold value with a correlation with the PSF of > 0.5. Transient sources!
CFHT SNLS courtesy of Stephane Basa 2005.0 2005.6 Optically unresolved quasar!
Detection Rate with GALEX GALEX FUV band is sensitive to Rayleigh Jean’s tail of the soft X-ray blackbody emission. A large K correction makes unextincted flare flux detectable by DIS out to high z. Volume to which flares can be detected in a 10 ks DIS exposure 6.5x10-4yr-1 (MBH/106 M)-.25 (WM 2004) E+S0 luminosity function MBH = 8.1x10-5 (Lbulge/L )0.18 (FS 1991, MT 1991, MF 2001) Yields 5 events yr-1 sq.deg-1(z ≤ 1)
tmax≈2005.12 CFHT SNLS courtesy of Stephane Basa 2005.0 2005.6 Optically resolved galaxy!
Summary • Rich data set in spectral and temporal coverage when you combine GALEX + CFHT SNLS. • Optical spectroscopy is necessary to confirm that flaring galaxies do not have an AGN, and we follow up our best candidates with Chandra TOO imaging. • Legacy fields with multiwavelength coverage seem to be the most promising for identifying interesting variable sources. • Can measure the distribution of masses and spins of dormant black holes. • We have a new candidate with an inactive galaxy host confirmed by VLT TOO optical spectroscopy. We are awaiting the Chandra TOO observation results.