160 likes | 326 Views
Civil war and genocide in Darfur: comparing english.aljazeera.net and news.bbc.co.uk. Kelly Kinner and Katherine Osos School of Journalism and Mass Communication CU-Boulder. Why compare Al Jazeera and BBC internet sites
E N D
Civil war and genocide in Darfur: comparing english.aljazeera.net and news.bbc.co.uk Kelly Kinner and Katherine Osos School of Journalism and Mass Communication CU-Boulder
Why compare Al Jazeera and BBC internet sites • Are there differences in the coverage of Darfur because of the different national/regional interests of the UK and the Middle East/Qatar? • Are there differences because of differences in who owns and operates the two sites?
Differences in national interest: -UK: former colonial power in Sudan -Qatar: an Arab country and member of the Arab League (like Sudan) which has done nothing to speak out against the genocide
Differences in ownership, operations, financing -BBC: established under British constitution, regulated by Foreign Office and Crown-appointed governors, financed by a tax on TV set ownership, operates in the Briitsh national interest -reputed to be the best public broadcasting org in the world, criticizes its own government consistently, upholds freedom of expression and fights state interference openly
Differences in ownership, operations, financing -Al Jazeera: financed by Emir of Qatar, criticizes Middle Eastern and Western governments, upholds freedom of media from state interference, founded as a result of a dissolved BBC/Saudi Arabian network
BBC 398 articles in first 26 months of crisis Sample: 50% of non-repeated stories: 175 Hard news: 67% In-depth feature articles 28% Al Jazeera 169 articles in first 26 months Sample: 50% of non-repeated stories: 76 Hard news: 99% In-depth feature articles: none Coverage of Darfur
BBC Causes cited in 19% articles -Race and ethnicity as primary causes: 35% -Government inequity and resources: 27% Al Jazeera Causes cited in 22%of articles -Race and ethnicity as primary causes: 17% -Government inequity and resources:29% Framing: causes, conduct, remedies?
BBC Darfur rebels demanding regional equity 7% Govt, their proxy Janjaweed fighters or both: 86% All domestic groups (rebels, govt, proxy fighters): 17% Al Jazeera Darfur rebels demanding regional equity :21% Govt, their proxy Janjaweed fighters or both: 32% All domestic groups (rebels, govt, proxy fighters): 29% Framing: Groups blamed as cause of crisis
BBC -Government: 9% -All domestic groups: 20% -Neighboring countries: 4% -UN and foreign agencies; 13% -domestic and foreign: 26% Al Jazeera Government: 12% -All domestic groups: 29% -Neighboring countries: 16% -UN and foreign agencies; 12% -domestic and foreign: 16% Framing: groups that could end the conflict
BBC -99% in-house authors Direct quotes: UN 34% Govt : 27% NGOs 22% Rebels: 11% Al Jazeera -97% articles from news agencies, e.g. Reuters and AFP Direct quotes: UN 14% Govt : 46% NGOs 11% Rebels: 32% Sources of news, quotes
BBC Low 19% Medium 40 High 41 Al Jazeera Low 38% Medium 43 High 20% Perception of emotional intensity of articles
Making sense of the similarities and differences • Apportioning reasons for Al J’s coverage between its regional location versus its Arab ownership is hard and is primarily an academic exercise here since they are so interconnected • How did national/regional interest show itself? -Al Jaz coverage of Muslim-on-Muslim violence conducted by Muslim dictatorship in fellow Arab country much less, less intense -Al J cited race and ethnicity as causes much less less often than BBC
Differences due to regional affiliation (contd) Al J blamed conflict on civil war initiators demanding regional equity for Darfur as causes of crisis 3 times more often than the BBC -BBC blamed the Sudan govt, their proxy fighters or both for causing the crisis 2.5 times as often as Al J -Solution responsibility was more often domestic and foreign for BBC than for Al J with much less emphasis on neighboring countries
How did differences in the ownership and operations of the news media express themselves? • Al J had primarily hard news stories based on news agency reports • Al J quoted UN less than half as often as BBC, quoted government almost twice as often as BBC • Al J articles generally lower in emotional intensity
Similarities with implications for coverage of genocide • Low attention to causes of conflict in both media