440 likes | 449 Views
Learn about the Pike County Hazard Mitigation Plan, its timeline, team members, and public participation requirements. Review the plan updates, risk assessments, and mitigation strategies to reduce long-term risk from various hazards.
E N D
2017 Pike County Hazard Mitigation Plan Project Synopsis
Hazard Mitigation “Mitigation” - A sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life and property from a hazard event • or – Any action taken to reduce future disaster losses
DMA 2000 Purposes and Requirements • The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) • Establishes a national program for pre-disaster hazard mitigation • Formalizes State administration of a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program • Requires State and Local All-Hazard Mitigation Plans as a condition of pre-disaster mitigation funding • Annual Grant Programs: PDM and FMA • Post-Disaster Grant Program: HMGP
Requirements for Local Mitigation Plan Updates • Updated Risk Assessment - a factual basis for activities proposed in the Mitigation Strategy section include: • Overview of hazards (type, location, probability) • Vulnerability analysis (impact on buildings, infrastructure, economy, development trends) • Multiple jurisdictions (specific to each town/borough/city) • Updated Mitigation Strategy – a blueprint for reducing losses identified in the risk assessment • Include the opportunity for public comment and for relevant agency and stakeholder involvement • Plan Maintenance and Adoption
Hazard Plans Timeline • Timeline • Federal Act in 2000 • Requires plan update every 5 yrs • Pennsylvania HazMit Plan in 2006 • Update in 2010 and 2013 • Draft anticipated in 2018 • Pike County HazMit Plan in 2006 • Update in 2012 and 2017 • Next update anticipated in
Organization of the Team • Pike County HMP Coordinator (Michael Mrozinski) • Contract Consultant (Tetra Tech) • Steering Committee • Michael Mrozinski; Brian Snyder; Sally Corrigan; Tim Knapp; Robert Melvin; Alison Miskiman, TetraTech • Planning Team • Steering Committee • Municipal representatives • Stakeholders • General Public
Municipal Participation • Attend meetings/workshops • Provide data and complete worksheets • Support public and stakeholder outreach • Visit the project website at www.pikecountypahmp.com • Place tri-fold brochure out for the public • Review and provide feedback on Draft and Final HMP • Adoption – Governing Body must pass an Adoption Resolution • Implement and Maintain the Plan
Citizen Survey (~10 minutes) https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PikeCitizenSurvey
Hazard Mitigation Planning Process • Update the Capabilities Assessment • Update the Risk Assessment • Update the Mitigation Strategy • Update Other Sections of the HMP • Submit the HMP for Review • Adopt the HMP • Implement the HMP • Yearly review and 5 year update cycle
Capability Assessment Results • Planning and Regulatory • Existing Hazard Mitigation Plan • Emergency Operations Plan • Participation in NFIP • Subdivision and Zoning Regulations
Capability Assessment Results • Administrative and Technical
Capability Assessment Results • Fiscal
Capability Assessment Results • Political Capability
Capability Assessment Results • Self-Assessment (staff)
Update the Risk Assessment • These are the Five Steps to Assess Risk: • Identify Hazards • Profile Hazards • Inventory Assets • Estimate Losses • Evaluate Mitigation Options
Dam Failure • Hazard Profile: • 82 Dams; 39 High-Hazard* • 7 dam failures since 1955 • Everything within inundationzone is considered vulnerable *National Performance of Dams Program
Drought • Hazard Profile: • History (1980 to August 2016) • 18 drought-watch declarations • 16 drought-warning declarations • 13 drought-emergency declarations (PADEP, 2016) • 1 FEMA drought declaration (1964-1966) • Exposure • 55,795 acres of farmland • $2.97 Million per year in agricultural products • $259,000 in livestock, poultry, and associated products (USDA, 2012) • According to USDA, $0 in lost crop insurance payments since 1948
Drowning • Hazard Profile: • History • 1980 to 2008: 56 deaths due to drowning in the Upper Delaware River(NPS, 2008) • According to Pike County EMA, there have been 214 water rescues since 2010 • Since the last HMP one drowning in Westcolang Lake in Lackawaxen Township(July 2016)
Earthquake • Hazard Profile: • History • No historic earthquakes with epicenters in the County • Annualized Losses: $129,570 • Losses from 500-year mean return period (MRP) event • $11,398,663 in building damages • 8,781 tons of debris • Losses from 2,500-year MRP event • $110,564,051 in building damages • 48,071 tons of debris
Environmental Hazards • Hazard Profile: Environmental Hazards (Hazardous Materials) • Types of hazards • Hazardous materials (HazMat) releases (fixed or in-transit) • Oil and gas well incidents (including Marcellus Shale, oil and gas production and distribution) • History • 134 HazMat incidents reported in CAD (2010 to Present) • No Marcellus Shale incidents in the County • Exposure: • HazMat sites • Major routes that transport hazardous materials • Natural gas transmission pipelines • Expected damage depends on the incident
Extreme Temperature • Hazard Profile: Heat and Cold
Flood • Hazard Profile: Riverine Flood, Flash Flood, and Ice Jam • History of flood events • 5 FEMA Flood Disaster Declarations since 1954 • Remnants of Hurricanes Connie and Diane (1955) • Remnants of Hurricane Agnes (1972) • Flash Flood (April 2005) • Flood along Delaware (2006) • Hurricane Irene (2011) • Ice Jam Historic Events (CRREL) • Shohola Creek • Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers
Flood • Risk Assessment Results • Estimated 514 people in the 1% annual chance floodplain (2010 Census) • Estimated $188,590,000 in exposed property value • Expected Losses (1-Percent Annual Chance Flood) • $3,258,305 in property damage (including residential, commercial, and other occupancy types) • 17,097 tons of debris • 1,865 households displaced • 854 people seeking shelter
Invasive Species • Hazard Profile: • Aquatic Invasives • Emerald Ash Borer • Purple Loosestrife • Hemlock Woolly Adelgid • Japanese Knotweed • Gypsy moth • Ticks and Mosquitos
Landslide • Landslide • History: Recent events in County • Exposed County population • 31.7% of the population is in the high- susceptibility/moderate-incidence zone • Exposed property value • $3,565,516,000 in the high-susceptibility/moderate-incidence zone • Expected losses depend on the nature and extent of the landslide
Lightning Strike • Hazard Profile: • History: • 5 lightning events that caused injury or fatality (1950 – 2013) • Exposure: • All exposed outdoors in thunderstorm
Hurricane, Tropical Storm, Nor’Easter • Hazard Profile: • History • 18 Tropical Cyclone Events within 65 Nautical Miles of Pike County since 1850’s • 5 federally declared hurricane and tropical storm events since 1954; • Several major events in the last 15 years: • Vulnerability Assessment Results • Annualized Losses: $58,878
Hurricane, Tropical Storm, Nor’Easter • Losses from 100-year mean return period (MRP) event: TS wind speeds • $549,080 (Structure Only) in building damages • Less than 100 tons of debris • Losses from 500-year MRP event: TS and Cat 1 wind speeds • $7,094,001 (Structure Only) in building damages • 124 tons of debris
Nuclear Incidents • Hazard Profile: • Susquehanna Steam Electric Station in Luzerne County, PA • Indian Point Power Plant in Westchester County, NY • History: No major accidents
Pandemic • Hazard Profile: • Primary pandemic/infectious disease focus: • Ebola, Flu, Lyme, Measles, West Nile, Zika • History: Four major pandemics in the last 100 years • Exposure: Entire County is vulnerable • Increased vulnerability: • highly/densely populated areas • Visiting tourists • No hospitals in the County
Radon Exposure • Hazard Profile • History • Estimated 40% homes in PA have elevated radon levels • Tests > 4 pCi/L (picoCuries per liter) • Exposure: Entire County (no known safe level of exposure) • Impacts Include • Lung cancer • Contaminated groundwater • Economic loss – radon mitigation system (average $1200)
Terrorism • Hazard Profile: • History • Threats made in several municipalities (e.g., bomb threats) • Considerations • Influx of people from New York metropolitan area seeking shelter
Tornadoes and Windstorms • Hazard Profile: • History: 40 events since 1950 • 9 Tornadoes since 1954 • Exposure: Entire County • Expected Losses: 500-year MRP (66-76 miles per hour [mph]) • $7,094,001 in damages to building stock • 124 tons of debris (structural only)
Transportation Accidents • Hazard Profile: • History • 10,168 vehicle accidents (2010-2016) • 38 fatalities from automobile crashes (2010-2014) • Two pedestrian fatalities (2010-2014) • Potential impacts and other damages • Release of hazardous materials • Interruption of critical supply/access routes • Traffic congestion
Urban and Fire Explosions • Hazard Profile: • According to Pike County EMA, there have been 1,472 urban fires (2010-2016). • Mainly residential structure fires and explosions. • Exposure and vulnerability • Urban areas have greater vulnerability • Compliance with current fire safety codes
Utility Interruptions • Hazard Profile: • Often a secondary impact of another hazard event • According to Pike County EMA, 1,554 utility incidents (2010 – 2016) • Exposure: Entire County • Regional events are usually the most severe • Impacts to vulnerable populations
Wildfire • Hazard Profile: • History • 225 wildfires within Pike County between 2002-2008 • April 2016 – 16-Mile Fire • Near border of Monroe and Pike Counties – more than 8,000 acres burned
Wildfire • Area of Exposure to Wildland-Urban Interface Zone • 50,454 residents exposed (87.9% of total population) • 34,620 structures exposed (90.1% of total number of buildings) • Approximately $11.4 billion in exposed replacement cost value (87.4% of total RCV) • 99 critical facilities exposed
Winter Storm • Hazard Profile: • 70 major winter storm events since 1950 • 2 disaster declarations since 1954 • Exposure • Entire County is vulnerable to heavy snow and ice storms • Over $8 billion in structural value • Impacts • Vulnerable populations • Damage to roofs and building frames • Cost of snow/ice removal • Damage to roadways and infrastructure
Update the Mitigation Strategy • Review Goals and Objectives • Determine Status of Mitigation Actions • Identify New Mitigation Actions/Projects • Conduct Mitigation Strategy Workshop • Review with Planning Team • Conduct Public Meeting • Mitigation Strategy 5-Year Mitigation Plan Review • Adopt the Plan - Completed
Questions? Thank you for your time! Michael Mrozinski mmrozinski@pikepa.org