1 / 24

Leaky Education Pipeline

Leaky Education Pipeline. Of every 100 students who enter kindergarten: 71 graduate from high school 42 enter a community college or university 18 receive a diploma within 6 years. Source: National Collaborative for Post-Secondary Educational Policy

Download Presentation

Leaky Education Pipeline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Leaky Education Pipeline Of every 100 students who enter kindergarten: • 71 graduate from high school • 42 enter a community college or university • 18 receive a diploma within 6 years Source: National Collaborative for Post-Secondary Educational Policy Data on students who transfer between post-secondary institutions is not available and therefore not included in this calculation

  2. Early Learning

  3. Current Early Learning Programs Only Serve Half of Eligible Low Income Children Sources: Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program, Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development; Washington State Association of Head Start and ECEAP

  4. Early Learning: A High Return on Investment 55% 48% Those who receivedpreschool program 36% 31% 25% Those who did not 14% Placed inSpecialEducation Held Backin grade Attended 4yrcollege Source: S. W. Barnett, “Long-Term Effects of Early Childhood Programs on Cognitive and School Outcomes”, The Future of Children, 1995.

  5. Education Trust Fund • 10,000 new high quality early learning spaces for low-income children • Higher quality, better funded ECEAP program currently serving 6,000 children • New quality standards tied to learning outcomes

  6. K-12

  7. Meeting the Challenge ? Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction

  8. Student Needs Have Escalated • English Language Learners • Special EducationStudents • Children in PovertyEligible for Free or Reduced Price Lunch Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction

  9. K-12 Funding Erosion Washington’s per pupil expenditures from all sources compared to national average support * NCES estimates ** NCES data unavailable for 1981-85 Source: National Center for Education Statistics

  10. National Benchmarking Total K-12 spending (all sources): • 1991-92 Washington ranked 17th in nation • 2000-01 Washington ranked 30th in nation K-12 per student funding (all sources) per $1000 of personal income • 1991-92 Washington ranked 24th in nation • 2000-01 Washington ranked 45th in nation Source: US Census Bureau

  11. State Funding Erosion K-12 share of state operating budget – all funds K-12 share of state operating budget – general fund Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction

  12. Education Trust Fund • Every student meeting today’s high standards • Fully fund I-728, as voters intended, for class size reduction, teacher training, and extended learning opportunities • New targeted funding based on poverty and bilingual needs • Every student, every school benefits

  13. Education Trust Fund • Restore voter-approved pay raise for educators suspended in 2003-05 budget • Provide incentives for teachers to earn National Board Certification • Forgive teacher loans to encourage certification in high needs areas

  14. Higher Education

  15. Access Crisis 307,156 Projected current servicelevel for 2009-10 = 247,150 60,000 250,000 Growth to maintaincurrent participationrate: +33,517 200,000 Budgeted enrollmentfor2004-05 = 213,633 150,000 100,000 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2020 Sources: 2003-05 Operating Budget; Office of Financial Management; 2020 commission

  16. Dramatic Increases in Tuition and Fees

  17. Education Trust Fund Increase opportunities for our students to go to community and technical colleges and universities • 25,000 state-funded enrollments • 7,000 high demand enrollments in fields such as nursing and engineering

  18. Increase Financial Aid and Expand Assistance to High Achievers • Increase State Need Grant eligibility to students from families with less than 65% of the median family income • Extend Washington Promise Scholarship Program to top 30% of every high school graduating class

  19. Education Trust Fund Principles • New dedicated revenue stream for education • Tough no-supplanting provisions • Greater collaboration, efficiency, and accountability • Strong citizen oversight

  20. Education Trust Fund • Increase state sales tax rate from 6.5% to 7.5% • Voters believe that since everyone benefits from education, everyone should pay • Children can’t wait for the adults to reform our tax system

  21. Education Investments Pay Off • Education benefits the individual in higher personal income • Education benefits society in more rapid economic growth • Social benefits include less crime, lower welfare costs, and higher tax receipts • The better the schools, the longer students continue their education and the greater the economic benefit

  22. Economic Value of Education Source: 2000 U.S. Census

  23. www.edtrustfund.org • info@edtrustfund.org • 206-728-6448 • PO Box 1727, Seattle, 98111

More Related