1 / 4

Summary

Summary. Paul Emma (SLAC) Superconducting Undulator R&D Review Jan. 31, 2014. SCUs Can Have Dramatic Impact on LCLS-II. 1.2 - 4.0 keV Self-Seeded (SS). PM. In- Vac. NbTi. Nb 3 Sn. 65 m. g = 7.5 mm ge = 0.45 m m I pk = 1 kA s E = 500 keV  b  = 15 m.

whitney-duran
Download Presentation

Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary Paul Emma (SLAC) Superconducting Undulator R&D Review Jan. 31, 2014

  2. SCUs Can Have Dramatic Impact on LCLS-II 1.2 - 4.0 keV Self-Seeded (SS) PM In-Vac NbTi Nb3Sn 65 m g = 7.5 mm ge = 0.45 mm Ipk = 1 kA sE = 500 keV b = 15 m lu = 27.5 mm, 24.8 mm, 20.3 mm, 18.7 mm (4 GeV)

  3. Total Cost Estimate (ANL & LBNL) = 3.1 M$ No contingency added

  4. Summary • SCUs in LCLS-II, or future machines, can make a truly dramatic improvement in performance • LCLS-II performance requirements present an opportunity to take the next big step in FEL design • We propose 18 months of R&D to advance this technology, hoping to impact the LCLS-II design • The plan includes two engineering approaches and two technologiesin order to more fully explore options • We collaborate with very experienced labs (ANL & LBNL) • If too late for LCLS-II, this new technology can still support future (expansion) undulators for LCLS-II, or for any machine • Thanks for your attention and advice

More Related