1 / 27

Erik Oller

The National Shipbuilding Research Program aims to reduce ship ownership costs, improve shipbuilding efficiency, and enhance shipbuilding-related processes through collaborative research and development. This program focuses on key platforms such as large and small surface combatants, unmanned surface combatants, polar icebreakers, and ship maintenance and repair.

wholcomb
Download Presentation

Erik Oller

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Erik Oller Program Manager National Shipbuilding Research Program NAVSEA 06N

  2. National Shipbuilding Research ProgramAll Panel MeetingNavy Program Manager Perspective Erik Oller, PMP NAVSEA 06N 12 March 2019

  3. “We are facing adversaries who possess significant military capabilities and aspire to be the equal of the United States. These nation states are improving their warfighting capabilities at a rapid pace, shrinking our competitive advantage, and redefining international norms to further their long-term goals. It is imperative we outpace them.” VADM Thomas J. Moore Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command

  4. NSRP Mission • Manage and focus national shipbuilding and ship repair research & development funding on technologies and processes that will: • Reduce the total ownership cost of ships for the U.S. Navy, other national security customers and the commercial sector • Develop and leverage best commercial and naval practices to improve the efficiency of the U.S. shipbuilding and ship repair industry • Provide a collaborative framework to improve shipbuilding-related technical and business processes

  5. Vision for the Future • Accelerate our support for • Large Surface Combatant • Small Surface Combatant • Unmanned Surface Combatant • Common Hull Auxiliary Multi-Mission Platform • Polar Icebreaker • Ship maintenance and repair • Improve • Performance to expenditure benchmarks • NSRP’s reputation • Maintain • Support for current shipbuilding and ship repair programs • NSRP’s high implementation rate

  6. NAVSEA NSRP Program Office NSRP Program Executive Contractor Government NSRP Program Manager NSRP Program Engineer Business and Financial Support Program Analyst Surface Preparation and Coatings Environmental Ship Weapons System Integration NSWCPD Lead/Electrical NSWCCD Lead Workforce Development Risk Management Business Technologies Ship Design and Material Technologies Welding Planning, Production Processes and Facilities The NAVSEA NSRP Program Office is here to help.

  7. Planning for Success • What industry need will your project meet? • Who can help you understand the scope of the problem? • Who can help you develop a solution? • What will project success look like? • What will be necessary to implement the solution? • Who will need to approve implementation? What will they ask for? • Can you leverage a past or current project? • How does your project fit into the shipbuilding plan? • Will another project be necessary? “Start with the end in mind.” – Steven Covey

  8. 171210-N-NI812-040 U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Ian Kinkead / Released) 140704-N-ZZ999-002 U.S. Navy photo / Released 180921-N-PL946-1042 U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Spencer Fling / Released

  9. John Carney Director Navy ManTech Program Office of Naval Research

  10. ACCELERATING TO THE NAVY & MARINE CORPS AFTER NEXT Navy ManTech Program Impacting Key Platform Affordability John Carney Director, Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) Code 33 MT 12 Mar 2019 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for Public Release

  11. Navy ManTech Organization Code 33 – Mission Capable, Persistent and Survivable Naval Platforms Maddie Maldonado ADS John Carney ONR 33 MT Director, Navy ManTech Dr. Richard Fonda NRL Financial / Budgetary Support Sarah Mitchell Bill Palko Dick Parisse Lorie Lee Denise Piastrelli Mike Siegel Matt Lesniewski ADS/Consultants 6.1 ManScience Program Program Director ManTech Portfolio Manager: - PEO (Carriers) - PEO (Ships) - PEO (USC) - PEO (Subs) JDMTP Principal ManTech Contractor Support Paul Huang Program Officer Neil Graf Program Officer -- Vacant -- Program Officer Rich HensonProgram Officer Program Officer / COR: - iMAST - CNM Program Officer / COR: - NSAM Coordination with S&T AME Subject Matter Expert JDMTP AME Subpanel Program Officer / COR: - CMTC ManTech Portfolio Manager: - PEO (JSF) - F-35 - PEO (A) - CH-53K JDMTP Composites Subpanel Program Officer / COR: - EMPF - EOC JDMTP Electronics Subpanel Legend Carrie Davis NSWC-CD ONR Technical Support Contractor JDMTP Metals Subpanel

  12. 6.3 – Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) • Mission: Industrial Preparedness • Development of enabling manufacturing technology – new processes and equipment – for implementation on DoD weapon system production lines • DoD 4200.15 states investments should: • Transition emerging S&T results to acquisition programs • Improve industrial capabilities in production, maintenance, repair and industrial base responsiveness • Advance manufacturing technology to reduce cost, improve performance, and responsiveness • Funding (PE 0603680N): • FY19: $58.7M • FY20: $60.1M (budgeted) • Execution: • ManTech Centers of Excellence (COEs) • POCs: ONR Program Officers / COEs 3 of 18

  13. Centers of Excellence – Execution Agents – • Executed through Centers of Excellence (COEs) • Execute projects; manage project teams • Collaborate with acquisition program offices / industry to identify and resolve mfg issues • Develop and demo mfg technology solutions for identified Navy requirements • Facilitate transfer of developed technologies Institute for Manufacturing and Sustainment Technologies (IMAST) Operated by Penn State Applied Research Laboratory State College, PA Electro-Optics Center (EOC) Operated by Penn State Applied Research Laboratory Freeport, PA Electronics Manufacturing Productivity Facility (EMPF) Operated by American Competitiveness Institute (ACI) Philadelphia, PA Energetics Manufacturing Technology Center (EMTC) Naval Surface Warfare Center – Indian Head (NSWC-IH) Indian Head, MD Composites Manufacturing Technology Center (CMTC) Operated by Advanced Technology International (ATI) Summerville, SC Center for Naval Metalworking (CNM) Operated by Advanced Technology International (ATI) Summerville, SC Naval Shipbuilding and Advanced Manufacturing (NSAM) Center Operated by Advanced Technology International (ATI) Summerville, SC COE Legend Contracted Government 4 of 18

  14. FY20 ManTech Investment Strategy CNR Approved – Jun 2018 1. Major Acquisition Platform Affordability PEO (A) CH-53K PEO (Carriers) CVN 78 Class PEO (Ships) DDG 51 Class PEO (Subs) VIRGINIA COLUMBIA PEO (USC) FFG(X) Class PEO (JSF) F-35 FY20 Investment Strategy 2. Capability Acceleration • Supports CNO direction to get capabilities to the fleet faster FY20 Investment Strategy– now 2 focus areas • Major Acquisition Platform Affordability • Capability Acceleration 1. Major Acquisition Platform Affordability • FFG(X) added for FY20 • CH-53K continues with FY20 last year for new starts 2. Capability Acceleration • Supports CNO direction to get capabilities to the fleet faster • Issues addressed must be production- or manufacturing technology-related 5 of 18

  15. ManTech Shipbuilding Affordability Initiatives

  16. VIRGINIA / COLUMBIA Class Submarine Affordability Initiatives • Projected class maintenance/repair cost savings: $100+M Extended affordability focus to COLUMBIA Class Submarine (CLB) • Investment: approx. $7.7M to date • Total estimated acquisition savings: $17.4M/hull • Recognized cost savings to date: $14.3M/hull • 8 projects implemented or in the process of implementation (Nov 2018 Electric Boat update) Annual Navy ManTech Budget returned with yearly VCS cost savings of >$80M VIRGINIA Class Submarine (VCS) Initiative • Investment: approx. $94.2M to date • Total estimated acquisition savings: $49.7M/hull • Recognized cost savings to date: $42.1M/hull • 55 projects implemented or in the process of implementation (Nov 2018 Electric Boat update) 7 of 18

  17. DDG 51 Class DestroyerAffordability Initiative Navy ManTech Portfolio Specifics • Investment: approx. $76.4M to date • Total estimated acquisition cost savings: $32.6M/hull • Recognized cost savings to date: $21.3M/hull (Oct 2018 update) • 30 projects implemented or in process of implementation 8 of 18

  18. CVN 78 FORD Class CarrierAffordability Initiative • Total estimated acquisition cost savings: $46.9M/hull (Oct 2018 update) • Recognized cost savings to date: $23.6M/hull (Nov 2018 update) • 14 projects implemented or in process of implementation CVN in Investment Strategy prior to switch to affordability • Older projects largely focused on performance improvement, weight and center of gravity reduction, and TOC reduction Navy ManTech Portfolio Specifics • Investment: approx. $29.9M to date 9 of 18

  19. FY20 Investment Strategy New Affordability Initiative Addition – FFG(X) • After FY2020 Contract Award, ManTech can engage with – • Design for build • Modularity and flexibility • Shipbuilding optimization, etc. • FFG(X) – Major Acquisition Platform Affordability • Initial ManTech efforts for planned / possible GFE systems • NGSSR – Open and Common Modular Building Blocks (Active) • SEWIP III Lite • High Energy Laser (HEL) Weapon System 10 of 18

  20. ManTech Capability Acceleration 11 of 18

  21. Rapid Demonstration Programs Vehicle Swarm Technology $43M Contract (Feb 2019) to Boeing for 4 Orca Extra Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (XLUUV) (based on Boeing’s Echo Voyager) Sea Hunter II (Leidos / USMI) (Sea Hunter graphic) • Key component of strategy to deliver warfighting capability faster • Fundamentally different than traditional acquisition programs • Technology testbed in lower risk environment • Experiment with novel production approaches • Go from prototype to production scale in months not years • Utilize distributed manufacturing • Produce (or assemble) at point of use • Feedback product and process learning to traditional acquisition 12 of 18

  22. FY20 Investment Strategy New Additions – Capability Acceleration Navy Manufacturing Portfolio 6.2 – Mfg Applied Research (FY20 - $0.964 Exec) 6.1 – Mfg Science (FY20 - $0.860 Exec) 6.3 – Manufacturing Technology (FY20 - $60.1M) • Cap Acceleration – Platforms within Affordability Investment Strategy • Submarine Coatings (VCS/CLB) – large active effort • SEWIP III Lite (FFG(x)) – initial discussions • High Energy Laser (HEL) System (FFG(x)) – 4 projects in development for FY20-21 • Cap Acceleration – Platforms outside Affordability Investment Strategy • SuperSwarm • SuperSwarm Electronics – 3 MRR projects starting in FY19 • SuperSwarm Vehicle Production Optimization – project initiating in FY19 • Unmanned Swarming Amphibious Assault Craft (USAAC) – in discussions • Sonobuoy– discussions on production scale-up • Sea Hunter II / MUSV – engaging on future MUSV 13 of 18

  23. ManTech FY20 Planning Cycle– Top Level – *** Industry Involvement • ManTech Investment Strategy Guidance Jun 2018 • Acquisition PM / Industry / COE Discussions Jun-Nov 2018 & Project Generation *** • ManTech Program Office Approval 6-7 Nov 2018 • Program Office Prioritization and Approval 1-15 Jan 2019 • Approved Prioritized Plan per Platform 1 Feb 2019 • Project Proposal Phase Feb - 15 Jul 2019 • Proposal Review / Approval 15 Jul–Sep 2019 • Project Initiation (FY20 Projects) *** Oct 2019 14 of 18

  24. ManTech Project Initiation Process Improvement • Jan 2019 Carriers Technology Meeting with RADM Antonio and RADM Hahn, HII-NNS.  RADM Hahn impressed with accomplishments – said go faster. • ONR, COEs, and shipbuilders working on process improvements to shorten span time • Mapping process steps to gain common understanding • Reviewing major steps • Analyzing variety of ideas for improvement • Standardize proposal documentation especially cost proposal • Provide longer bid validity to enable award without reprice • Understand impact of delays on planned project execution team and implementation • Improve communications • Looking at alternative approaches • COEs – Industry purchase agreements • Mega Rapid Response (MRR) – works well … what can be applied to larger projects? • Others? • FY20 Process – targeting earlier project start dates 15 of 18

  25. Future Focus – AI in Production – Performed by Institute for Manufacturing and Sustainment Technologies (iMAST) PBOM Quality Assurance Using AI at BIW (Active): • Platform: DDG-51 • AI to automatically detect patterns and anomalies within the PBOM data • User-friendly front-end software to conduct PBOM QA and provide feedback for AI improvement • Estimating 25% reduction in Build Change Requests (BCRs) from hull to hull and 50% reduction in BCRs due to PBOM errors with PBOM QA system • Est. Cost Savings: $700K/hull AI for Parts Recognition at EB (FY20 Planned): • Platforms: VCS / CLB • Develop database of idealized part models / AI system for part scanning and identification • Est. Cost Savings: $0.500M/hull (both VCS and CLB) AI for Planning at EB (FY20 Planned): • Platform: CLB • Develop AI for planning to iterate and optimize build plan prior to the construction on the lead ship • Est. Cost Savings: $5.0M/hull To Be Performed by Naval Shipbuilding & Adv Mfg (NSAM) Center To Be Performed by Naval Shipbuilding & Adv Mfg (NSAM) Center 16 of 18

  26. Future Focus – AR in Production – Augmented Visualization for Manual Welding (Active): • Platform: DDG-51 • Develop and test visualization for manual welding • Integrate high dynamic range cameras with head-mounted displays • Testing of COTS and new technology for improved learning curve, productivity, and first-time quality • Requirements planning for AR • Est Cost Savings: > $1.5M/hull Performed by Electro-Optics Center (EOC) Augmented Reality (AR) in Ship Construction (Active): • Platforms: All • Phase 1 – Technology baseline study to identify state of AR technologies • Wearables and mobile devices for augmented and mixed reality, safety requirements, security considerations, user interfaces • Team members – Electric Boat, Bath Iron Works, Ingalls, Newport News, Boeing • 6 month, approx. $500K study to be followed by tech development and iterative AR implementation at shipyards Performed by Naval Shipbuilding & Adv Mfg (NSAM) Center 17 of 18

  27. Upcoming Program Reviews / Other Important Dates Updated: 25 Feb 2019 13-14 Mar (13th pm / 14th am) CVN Renaissance Charleston, Charleston, SC 14-15 Mar (14th pm / 15th am) VCS/CLB Renaissance Charleston, Charleston, SC 2-3 Apr (2nd pm / 3rd all day) F-35JPO Conference Center, Arlington, VA 4-5 Apr (4th 0930-1700 / 5th am) CH-53K ADS Federal, Arlington, VA 30 Apr (am only) Additive Mfg Tutorial ARL Penn State, State College, PA 30 Apr-1 May (30th pm / 1st am) DDG-51 ARL Penn State, State College, PA 1-2 May (1st pm / 2nd all day) Additive Mfg Summit ARL Penn State, State College, PA 10-11 Sep (10th pm / 11th am) DDG-51 HII–NNS, Newport News, VA 11-12 Sep (11th pm / 12th am) CVN HII–NNS, Newport News, VA 12-13 Sep (12th pm / 13th am) VCS/CLB HII–NNS, Newport News, VA 5-6 Nov (5th all day / 6th am) FY21 Planning Meetings TBD, Arlington, VA 2-5 Dec DMC 2019 Phoenix Convention Center, Phoenix, AZ 2019 18 of 18

More Related