1 / 33

Cambrian School District

2011-12 Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP ) October 18, 2012. Cambrian School District. Overview. Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Moving Forward. Growth model in California Weighted score

whoopi-cohen
Download Presentation

Cambrian School District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2011-12 Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) October 18, 2012 Cambrian School District

  2. Overview Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Moving Forward

  3. Growth model in California • Weighted score • Advancing from lower levels earns more points • 800+ considered high performing Academic Performance Index (API)

  4. District API

  5. District API

  6. Bagby API

  7. Fammatre API

  8. Farnham API

  9. Sartorette API

  10. Price API

  11. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • Federal Performance Model • Measures Percent Proficient • Numerically significant student subgroups • Targets increase each year until 2014 • 2012 targets • ELA 78.4% Math 79% • 2013 targets • ELA 89.2% Math 89.5% • 2014 targets • ELA 100% Math 100%

  12. ELA Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White • Hispanic • English Learners • Economically Disadvantaged (SED) Just missed AYP Criteria • Students with Disabilities District AYP • Math • Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White • English Learners • Just missed AYP Criteria • Hispanic • SED • Students with Disabilities

  13. ELA Met AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learners Just missed AYP Criteria • SED Bagby AYP Math • Met AYP Criteria • White • English Learners • SED • Just missed AYP Criteria • Hispanic

  14. ELA Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White • Hispanic • English Learner • SED Fammatre AYP Math • Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White • English Learners • Just missed AYP Criteria • Hispanic • SED

  15. ELA Met AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learners • SED • Students with Disabilities Farnham AYP Math • Met AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learners • SED • Students with Disabilities

  16. ELA Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White • Hispanic • English Learners • SED Sartorette AYP Math • Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White • English Learners • SED • Just missed AYP Criteria • Hispanic

  17. ELA Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White • Hispanic • English Learners Just missed AYP Criteria • SED Price AYP Math • Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White • Hispanic • Just missedAYP Criteria • English Learners • SED

  18. Formal designation for Title l funded schools and Districts that do not make AYP criteria for any numerically significant subgroups, according to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Program Improvement (PI)

  19. Based on AYP criteria for subgroups • District and Sartorette are in PI Year 2 • Farnham “frozen” in PI Year 1 Program Improvement

  20. Program ImprovementYear 2 Requirements

  21. Complete PI Year 2 requirements • Disaggregate data, CST, benchmarks and other assessments • Site, grade level, subgroups, target students • Continue and refine high quality instruction • Provide specific interventions for targeted students with ongoing monitoring of progress and adjustment of instruction • Stay the course! Moving Forward

More Related