280 likes | 411 Views
What’s coming up???. Oct 25 The atmosphere, part 1 Ch. 8 Oct 27 Midterm … No lecture Oct 29 The atmosphere, part 2 Ch. 8 Nov 1 Light, blackbodies, Bohr Ch. 9 Nov 3,5 Postulates of QM, p-in-a-box Ch. 9 Nov 8,10 Hydrogen and multi – e atoms Ch. 9 Nov 12 Multi-electron atoms Ch.9,10
E N D
What’s coming up??? • Oct 25 The atmosphere, part 1 Ch. 8 • Oct 27 Midterm … No lecture • Oct 29 The atmosphere, part 2 Ch. 8 • Nov 1 Light, blackbodies, Bohr Ch. 9 • Nov 3,5 Postulates of QM, p-in-a-box Ch. 9 • Nov 8,10 Hydrogen and multi – e atoms Ch. 9 • Nov 12 Multi-electron atoms Ch.9,10 • Nov 15 Periodic properties Ch. 10 • Nov 17 Periodic properties Ch. 10 • Nov 19 Valence-bond; Lewis structures Ch. 11 • Nov 22 VSEPR Ch. 11 • Nov 24 Hybrid orbitals; VSEPR Ch. 11, 12 • Nov 26 Hybrid orbitals; MO theory Ch. 12 • Nov 29 MO theory Ch. 12 • Dec 1 bonding wrapup Ch. 11,12 • Dec 2 Review for exam
The Final Exam • December 13 (Monday) • 9:00 – 12:00 • Cumulative (covers everything!!) • Worth 50% of total mark • Multiple choice
The Final Exam • From my portion, you are responsible for: • Chapter 8 … material from my lecture notes • Chapter 9 … everything • Chapter 10 … everything • Chapter 11 … everything • Chapter 12 … everythingexcept 12.7
The Final Exam • You will need to remember • Relationship between photon energy and frequency / wavelength • De Broglie AND Heisenberg relationships • Equations for energies of a particle-in-a-box AND of the hydrogen atom • VSEPR shapes AND hybribizations which give them
My office hours next week • Wednesday Dec 8: 10-12AND2-4 • Friday Dec 10: 10-12 AND 2-4
Expected orbital splitting: s2p* p2p* p2p 2p s2p s2s* 2s 2s s2s The p do not split as much because of weaker overlap. 2p But the s and p along the internuclear axis DO interact E This pushes the s2p up..
Why does this happen? s-type orbitals have different energies depending on s-p interactions “pure” s and p orbitals O2 F2 Ne2 “pure” s-p hybrids B2 C2 N2
p2p orbitals p2p orbitals s2p Increasing s-p interaction s2s
MODIFIED ENERGY LEVEL DIAGRAM s2p* s interaction p2p* s2p 2p 2p p2p E s2s* 2s 2s s2s
Second row diatomic molecules NOTE SWITCH OF LABELS s2p* p2p* s2porp2p p2pors2p s2s* s2s Magnetism Bond order Bond E. (kJ/mol) Bond length(pm) B2 Para- 1 290 159 C2 Dia- 2 620 131 N2 Dia- 3 942 110 O2 Para- 2 495 121 F2 Dia- 1 154 143 E
s2p* s2p* p2p* p2p* s2p p2p 2p 2p 2p 2p p2p s2p s2s* s2s* 2s 2s 2s 2s s2s s2s HETERONUCLEAR DIATOMICS E
Energies of 1s and 2p orbitals are very different E = -RH Zeff2 / n2
Outcomes of MO Model • As bond order increases, bond energy increases and bond length decreases. • Bond order is not absolutely associated with a particular bond energy. • N2 has a triple bond, and a correspondingly high bond energy. • O2 is paramagnetic. This is predicted by the MO model, not by the LE model, which predicts diamagnetism.
Putting our bonding models together The VSEPR / hybridization approach is good at explaining shapes around a central atom in a molecule BUT, since it depends on keeping electrons in pairs at all times, it is not so good at predicting electron distributions (like in oxygen!) Is there a way to bring them together? Let’s go back to RESONANCE
Double bonds involve interacting p orbitals, outside of the bonding line p-p antibonding p-p bonding spread over whole molecule p-p non-bonding
We can make a similar p molecular orbital for the nitrate ion too!
Combining our 2 Models • bondscan be described as being localized. • bondingmust be treated as being delocalized.