200 likes | 286 Views
Publication Strategies. Vivian Siegel, PhD Director, Center for Science Communication Departments of Medicine (Genetic Medicine) and Cell and Developmental Biology. Strategic Issues. Deciding what constitutes a paper Writing the best possible paper Manuscript architecture Prereview
E N D
Publication Strategies Vivian Siegel, PhD Director, Center for Science Communication Departments of Medicine (Genetic Medicine) and Cell and Developmental Biology
Strategic Issues • Deciding what constitutes a paper • Writing the best possible paper • Manuscript architecture • Prereview • Anticipating the needs of editors and reviewers
Why do you publish? • To claim priority for a discovery • To share what you have learned and how you have learned it, so that others can build on that knowledge
How do you publish? • Through peer-reviewed journals of the highest possible “stature”
Priority and stature • Sometimes competition means you need to publish fast • High profile journals generally require “big stories”
“What’s new and why should I care?” • What is the question you have answered with your data? • How sophisticated do you have to be to appreciate the importance of that question? • How much work would it take to answer a “bigger” question - one that you don’t need to be quite so sophisticated to appreciate?
The Scientist in Your Field Methods Data (figures, tables, etc.) Legends The Outsider (scientists, editors, others) The “body” of the paper (introduction, results, discussion) There are two very distinct audiences for your paper Each piece needs individually to tell your story in a way that is best suited to the appropriate audience.
Title Summary Introduction Results Discussion Methods Figures/Tables
Writing Studio www.vanderbilt.edu/writing/index.php
Anticipate what editors and reviewers need and do • Editors need to know “what’s new and why it’s important” • Reviewers need to believe your conclusions • Reviewers will always ask for more • If Reviewers ask for more, Editors ask for more
Ironically, it takes longer than ever to get a paper published • 26 papers in JCB • June 1985 • June 1997 • June 2008 • Time from Submission to Acceptance • Scatter plot, red line is the Median
Overall P=0.0015 (Kruskal-Wallis) Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test June 1985 vs. June 1997: P>0.05 June 1985 vs. June 2008: P<0.05 June 1997 vs. June 2008: P< 0.01
What can you do? • Take every opportunity (cover letter, introduction, etc.) to express clearly why the question being answered by the paper is worth answering - this helps the editor • Provide enough experimental detail for reviewers to judge the technical quality of the work • Be honest (don’t hide work that undermines your conclusions, or oversell the paper, just to get past the editor) • Be strategic - manage expectations; write the paper so the reviewer asks for what you can provide • Be respectful in your response to the decision
Randy Schekman: The Role of an Editor: A Delicate Balancing Act • Vivian Siegel and Zena Werb: How to Read and Respond to a Journal Rejection Letter • William Wells: Me Write Pretty One Day: How to Write a Good Scientific Paper • Liana Holmberg: What Happened to My Figures?! http://www.ascb.org/files/WICB_Pub_Vol_I_II.pdf
Thank you. vivian.siegel@vanderbilt.edu