210 likes | 343 Views
Southwest Connecticut Reliability Study Update. Presentation to the TEAC January 24, 2002 Frank Mezzanotte. Study Objective. Formulate a long-term transmission solution for Southwestern Connecticut that Satisfies reliability criteria Eliminates operating difficulties
E N D
Southwest ConnecticutReliability Study Update Presentation to the TEAC January 24, 2002 Frank Mezzanotte
Study Objective • Formulate a long-term transmission solution for Southwestern Connecticut that • Satisfies reliability criteria • Eliminates operating difficulties • Eliminates first contingency (including double circuit) overloads • Eliminates threat of voltage collapse • Mitigates congestion by increasing SWCT and Nor-Stam transfer limits
Study Objective • And that • Provides the base transmission infrastructure to support additional generation expansion and retirements • Eliminates short circuit restrictions • Eliminates conditional dependence of generator operation • Provides an operable system during construction periods • Allows increased bi-directional transfer capability to other areas
Staged Analysis • Stage 1: Perform thermal and voltage analysis @ 27700MW; Formulate solution; Check field feasibility with design engineers; Perform preliminary short-circuit analysis. • Stage 2: Further test thermal & voltage @ other load levels; Perform preliminary dynamic analysis & transfer limit analysis; finalize short circuit & dynamic analyses
Current Status - Stage 1 • Draft Report for Stage 1 Complete • Text portion of Volume I will be available today after the presentations • Volume I Appendices & Volumes II-IV output listings will be available through ISO Customer Service by request only
Current Status - Stage 2 • Preliminary dynamic analysis complete • Transfer limit analysis in the works • Preparing additional base cases • Thorough area short circuit analysis underway • Plan to have Stage 2 draft report complete by end of 1st quarter
History • 345 kV loop originally proposed in 1970s postponed due to • Fluctuations in economy and load growth • 115 kV system improvements • Emphasis on optimum coordination of local generator and transmission maintenance
History (cont.) • Loads increased 25% in 1990s • Sale of existing generators resulted in loss of control of optimum coordination of local generator and transmission maintenance • More uncertainty surrounding future availability and performance of local generation
Problems Found • 28 instances of post contingent load flow non-convergence due to voltage collapse • 24 instances of normal overloads with all facilities normally in service (1% to 33% overloaded)
Problems Found (cont.) • Most severe single line contingencies • L/O Devon-Trumbull-Old Town (1710) creates a 10% LTE overload on the 1730 line • L/O Devon-Trumbull-Weston (1730) creates a 15% LTE overload on the 1710 line • L/O Pequonnock-Compo (1130) creates a 13% LTE overload on Pequonnock-Ash Creek (91001) • L/O Pequonnock-Ash Creek (91001) creates a 14% LTE overload on Old Town-Hawthorn
Problems Found (cont.) • Critical double circuit contingencies • L/O 1710 & 1730 lines (23 miles) • Up to 42% LTE overloads on lines along the Plumtree to Norwalk path & the Pequonnock to Glenbrook path • L/O 1130 & 91001 lines • Up to 69% LTE overloads on lines along the Devon to Norwalk path & the Norwalk to the south path
Transmission Alternatives 1) Various scenarios upgrading 115 kV lines from Frost Bridge, Southington and East Shore 2) 115 kV Plan • Upgrade Devon to Norwalk 115, Ckt 1 • Upgrade Devon to Norwalk 115, Ckt 2 • Upgrade Peaceable to Norwalk 115 • Build new Devon to Norwalk 115 • Build new Pequonnock to Norwalk 115 • Reconfigure Norwalk - Norwalk Harbor - Glenbrook 115 kV System
Transmission Alternatives (cont.) 3) Case 2 with Plumtree 115 kV Phase Angle Regulator 4) Case 3 with with Beseck to Devon 345 kV 5) 230 kV Loop: Plumtree - Norwalk - Beseck
Recommended Solution: 345-kV Loop • Plumtree - Norwalk - Pequonnock - Devon - Beseck 345kV • 2005 / 2006 In-service date • ~100 miles - mostly on existing ROW • Includes associated 115kV improvements • ~$500 to 600 million • Meets study objectives
Recommended Solution: 345-kV Loop • Preliminary Planning transfer limits • SWCT: in excess of 2900 MW • Nor-Stam: in excess of 1300 MW • Will probably eliminate the need for the Nor-Stam interface definition • Construction Sequencing • NU has proposed a phased approach • ISO is currently investigating impacts
Upgrade Recommendations 1. Add new 345kV Substations at Plumtree, Norwalk, Pequonnock, Devon, & Beseck Junction2. Add new 345kV loop from Plumtree to Beseck Junction3. Add (2) 3-150MVA auto transformers at Norwalk, (1) at Pequonnock, and (1) at Devon4. Add (1) 3-200 MVA auto transformers at Pequonnock to shift Bridgeport Energy output to 345kV5. Rearrange / add to 115kV between Norwalk, Norwalk Harbor and Glenbrook 6. Establish new 115kV substation adjacent to Devon (East Devon)7. Other 115kV work a/w new 345kV structures
1/9/02 8
1/9/02 5
Existing‘Simplified’1-Line Long Mountain FrostBridge Southington Plumtree BeseckJunction Devon SWCT Pequonnock Norwalk Key: 115 kV 345 kV Interface NOR-STAM 1/9/02 6
Proposed‘345 kV Loop’1-Line Long Mountain FrostBridge Southington Plumtree BeseckJunction Devon SWCT Pequonnock Norwalk Key: 115 kV 345 kV Proposed 345 kV NOR-STAM Interface 1/9/02 7
In Summary • Stage 1 draft report complete -recommending the 345-kV loop as the ultimate solution • Stage 2 in progress - aiming for completion by end of 1st quarter