390 likes | 504 Views
Direct Evidence of Emergence of a Helical Flux Rope under an Active-Region Prominence. Joten Okamoto Kyoto Univ. / NAOJ JSPS Research Fellow Saku Tsuneta, Bruce Lites, Masahito Kubo, Takaaki Yokoyama and Japan-US Hinode/SOT team + KD Leka, Tom Metcalf.
E N D
Direct Evidence of Emergence of a Helical Flux Rope under an Active-Region Prominence Joten Okamoto Kyoto Univ./NAOJ JSPS Research Fellow Saku Tsuneta, Bruce Lites, Masahito Kubo, Takaaki Yokoyama and Japan-US Hinode/SOT team + KD Leka, Tom Metcalf This work is my PhD thesis topic. I am provided limited protection for the data sets. (see http://solarb.msfc.nasa.gov/for_scientists/topics.html, http://solar-b.nao.ac.jp/hsc_e/OnGoing_top.shtml ) I have submitted the former part of this work to ApJL. The latter part (not included in this PPT) will be submitted.
Hinode satellite EIS • Hinode was launched in Sep. 2006. • 3 instruments • SOT (Soalr Optical Telescope) • photosphere, chromosphere • XRT (X-ray Telescope) • corona • EIS (EUV Imaging Spectrometer) • transition region, corona • Advantage of Hinode • Continuous high-quality movie • Small scale structures and time variation of solar phenomena • granules, small magnetic elements, spicules, prominences, … • In this talk, we focus on prominence observation. SOT XRT
Prominence • Cool plasma in the corona • ~ 10,000 K • over polarity inversion lines (PILs) • “filament” on disk • supported by coronal magnetic filed lines • Questions about prominences • Formation process • supply of mass • construction of magnetic field • Fine structures and their evolution • Disappearance and eruption • Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) SMART Hα image (Hida Obs.) Hinode/SOT Ca II H movie (Okamoto et al. 2007)
Structure of prominence magnetic fields • Helical in many cases • Measurement with polarization • e.g., Tandberg-Hanssen, Leroy • Extrapolation from eruption • e.g., CME taken by SOHO/LASCO • How to make this ? • same or difference of QS and AR prominences ? prominence helical field line Prominence in the unified model of flares and CMEs (Shibata et al.) QS prominence AR prominence
Formation of prominence magnetic fields prominence How are they made ? helical field line • Theory • Helical flux rope emergence from the photosphere • e.g., Rust, Kumar, Low, Lites… • Shear motion on the photosphere and reconnection in the corona • e.g., Pneuman, van Ballegooijen, Martens, Antiochos, Aulanier, Karpen… • Observation • No clear evidence • lack of accuracy of polarimetric measurement due to seeing • restriction to long-duration observation KEY: Motion and time-evolution of magnetic field on the photosphere Tracking of evolution of AR prominence
Data • Continuous observation of AR • 2007 Apr 28 ~ May 2 • AR 10953 • wavelength (Hinode) • SpectroPolarimeter (SP) fast map (160”x160”, 3~6-hour cadence ) • Hα (160”x160”, 1-min cadence) • G-band、Ca II H (108”x108”, 1-min cadence) • X-ray (512”x512”, 1-min cadence) • Estimation of magnetic field • Milne-Eddington inversion (Yokoyama et al.) • 180°ambiguity solution with AZAM (Lites et al.) • (Current 3,4 (Metcalf et al.)) Ca II H H-alpha ROI
Hα movie with Hinode/SOT • Repetition of formation and deformation during 2 days Hinode/SOT Hα 04.28 11:56 04.28 23:14 04.29 12:09 04.29 18:13 04.29 20:51 formation deformation formation deformation
After that…(Hida/SMART Hα) • Formation of a clear prominence • it looks stable after May 1 05.01 22:27 04.29 22:10 05.02 21:18 05.03 22:09 05.04 21:44 SOT FOV What can we see in SP data ? Evolution of photospheric magnetic field near the PIL during the promninence formation
+ - + - + - Result (photosphere) plage sunspot side PIL PIL PIL Interpretation (cross section of photosphere) × × × photosphere (conclusion)Helical flux rope emergence • Observational results (on the PIL) • Changing direction of horizontal magnetic field • Simultaneous appearance of a region having weak vertical magnetic field • Simultaneous upflow in the same region PIL sunspot side plage
sunspot side (<-500 G) plage (>500 G) PIL magneto-gram(1/9) 2007.04.29 11:43 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
magneto-gram(2/9) 2007.04.29 15:36 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
magneto-gram(3/9) 2007.04.29 20:16 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
magneto-gram(4/9) 2007.04.30 01:00 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
magneto-gram(5/9) 2007.04.30 05:07 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
magneto-gram(6/9) 2007.04.30 08:56 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
magneto-gram(7/9) 2007.04.30 15:46 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
magneto-gram(8/9) 2007.04.30 22:46 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
magneto-gram(9/9) 2007.05.01 08:16 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: boundary of ±500G of Bz
15” ~ 10,000 km vertical mag. (color contour)+horizontal mag.(arrows) ④ ① 2007.04.2911:43 2007.04.3005:07 ⑦ 2007.04.3022:46 ⑧ 2007.05.0102:06 2007.04.3008:56 2007.04.2915:36 ② ⑤ ⑨ 2007.04.2920:16 2007.04.3015:46 ③ ⑥ 2007.05.0108:16
-300 m/s vertical velocity of magnetic components by ME fitting (color contour)+horizontal mag. (arrows) ④ ① 2007.04.2911:43 2007.04.3005:07 ⑦ 2007.04.3022:46 ⑧ 2007.05.0102:06 2007.04.3008:56 2007.04.2915:36 ② ⑤ ⑨ 2007.04.2920:16 2007.04.3015:46 ③ ⑥ 2007.05.0108:16
normal or inverse ?(1/12) 2007.04.28 21:26 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(2/12) 2007.04.29 03:46 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(3/12) 2007.04.29 11:43 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(4/12) 2007.04.29 15:36 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(5/12) 2007.04.29 20:16 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(6/12) 2007.04.30 05:07 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(7/12) 2007.04.30 08:56 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(8/12) 2007.04.30 12:46 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(9/12) 2007.04.30 15:46 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(10/12) 2007.04.30 22:46 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(11/12) 2007.05.01 02:06 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
normal or inverse ?(12/12) 2007.05.01 05:16 vertical mag. red :+ blue:- horizontal mag. arrows black line: PIL 度 normal inverse
+ - + - + - Result (photosphere) plage sunspot side PIL PIL PIL Interpretation (cross section of photosphere) × × × photosphere Helical flux rope emergence • Observational results (on the PIL) • Changing direction of horizontal magnetic field • Simultaneous appearance of a region having weak vertical magnetic field • Simultaneous upflow in the same region PIL sunspot side plage
+ - + - + - Result (photosphere) plage sunspot side PIL PIL PIL Helical flux rope emergence
Emergence of helical flux ropeand Prominence 2007.04.29 15:36 2007.04.29 20:16 2007.04.30 05:07 2007.04.30 08:56 • Continuous prominence appeared after the emergence of the flux tube • Some remnants of prominence existed before the event • The newly-emerging fields connect with original fields or get rid of those ?
Motion on the photosphere(G-band) 2007.04.30 08:56 Red circle indicates the orientation of the prominence
Motion on the photosphere(G-band) 2007.04.30 08:56 Red circle indicates the orientation of the prominence advective flow: arrows No clear sheared motion, but some mesogranules under the prominence = support to emergence ?
Physical parameters 2007.04.3005:07 10,000 km sunspot side PIL plage • Duration of emergence: 24 – 36 hours • Rising height: ~25,000 km • 24 h ×300 m/s • Mag. field strength of prominence: ~100 G • 650 G ×0.15
Summary • Clear evidence of emerging helical flux rope associated with formation of prominence • Appearance of magnetized region that had weaker field strength along the PIL • After that, prominence was stabilized • No continuous sheared motion along the PIL • Shear/reconnection model is ruleed out ?... No • Our result is one example in an active region • Necessary to observe active/quiescent prominences quantitatively • How to emerge ? • Possible to emerge a whole long rope whose length is several tens of thousand km ? • Why is it located along the PIL ? • Mechanism of mass supply ? … We don’t know. • It supplied only helical magnetic field to the corona.