1 / 11

FLIP LEARNING

Dive into interpretations of rebellions like Warbeck & Simnel, test your knowledge, analyze key events, and assess historical significance. Understand interpretation vs. evidence for deeper insights!

Download Presentation

FLIP LEARNING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FLIP LEARNING • TASK: • What is an interpretation? • 2. What is evidence? • Revise everything you have learning on rebellion as there is going to be a fact test next lesson! • This lesson you will also be having a folder check! At the end of last lesson you were given this independent learning. Its now time to see what you have come up with. Task: We are going to start by discussing your answer the first 2 questions and then put your note away for the fact test!

  2. Who did Perkin Warbeck impersonate? In what year did the Yorkshire Rebellion take place? Which rebellion is linked with Perkin Warbeck? What happened to Lambert Simnel? “Lambert Simnel pretended to be Richard, Duke of York.” True or false? What issue sparked the Yorkshire Rebellion? Military action in which country prompted the Cornish Rebellion? Name the battle that ended the Simnel Rebellion. Which of the rebellions had the most foreign support? 10. Which rebellion happened in 1497? 11. Taxation was an issue in sparking which two rebellions? Which member of the kings household was executed for allying himself with Warbeck? What was the fate of Suffolk (Edmund de la Pole)? Which threats to the throne were executed in 1499? Which rebels sought sanctuary in Colchester Abbey before challenging the king in 1487? FACT TEST! Swap you answers with your partner and change to a green pen!

  3. Who did Perkin Warbeck impersonate? Richard, son of Edward IV In what year did the Yorkshire Rebellion take place? 1489 Which rebellion is linked with Perkin Warbeck? Cornish Rebellion What happened to Lambert Simnel? Offered a job working in the royal kitchens “Lambert Simnel pretended to be Richard, Duke of York.” True or false? False –this was the first idea but he impersonated the Earl of Warwick. What issue sparked the Yorkshire Rebellion? The demand for taxation to pay for a military campaign in Brittany Military action in which country prompted the Cornish Rebellion? Scotland Name the battle that ended the Simnel Rebellion. Battle of Stoke Which of the rebellions had the most foreign support? Warbeck Conspiracy 10. Which rebellion happened in 1497? Cornish Rebellion 11. Taxation was an issue in sparking which two rebellions? The Yorkshire and Cornish Rebellions Which member of the kings household was executed for allying himself with Warbeck? Sir William Stanley What was the fate of Suffolk (Edmund de la Pole)? Imprisoned in the Tower in 1506 (executed by Henry VIII in 1513) Which threats to the throne were executed in 1499? Warbeck and Warwick Which rebels sought sanctuary in Colchester Abbey before challenging the king in 1487? Lovell and Stafford Brothers FACT TEST! Give them a mark out of 15 and feedback your scores…

  4. How many of these statements do you agree with and why? 1. The Simnel Rebellion was a serious challenge to Henry VII’s authority. 2. The rebellions of 1486/7 were easily suppressed. 4. The Battle of Stoke was the final battle in the Wars of the Roses. 3. The Yorkists were still a threat after the Battle of Stoke.

  5. What threats did Henry VII face: WARBECK ASSESSMENT Good learning: Understand what is meant by interpretation Great learning: Explain how to answer Q1 on the exam and analysis different interpretations Even better: Write an answer on how convincing an interpretation is on Warbeck. Key Word: How important was the role of key individuals and groupsand how were they affected by developments? How effectively did the Tudors restore and develop the powers of the monarchy?

  6. What is an interpretation? An interpretation is a particular view on a topic of history held by a particular author or authors. Interpretations of an event can vary, for example, depending on how much weight an historian givesto a particular factor and whether they largely ignore another factor. The interpretations that you will be given will be largely from recent or fairly recent historians, and they may, of course, have been influenced by events in the period in which they were writing. • Now read through each of these statements and decide whether they are FACT or OPINION: • Warbeck and Simnel were pretenders to the throne of Henry VII. • The Simnel Rebellion was more significant than the Warbeck rising. • 3. The Warbeck conspiracy was more dangerous because of foreign support. • 4. The Simnel rising had more support within England.

  7. Interpretation and evidence The extracts given in the exam will contain a mixture of interpretations and evidence. The mark scheme rewards answers that focus on the interpretationsoffered by the extracts much more highly than answers that focus on the information or evidence mentioned in the extracts. Therefore, it is important to identify the interpretations.

  8. How convincingis this interpretation in relation to the significance of the Warbeck and Simnel risings? Refer to the extract and use your understanding of the historical context. (25 marks) The [Warbeck] plot had never won much support in England and had been a danger only because of the use made of it by foreign powers. Without their help, it would not have dragged on for so long. It is likely that Warbeck’s rising was part of a detailed plan by the Yorkists to regain the throne, rather than a spontaneous event. Although it is unlikely that he ever convinced anyone that he was Richard, the Yorkists saw in it their best chance of removing Henry and were willing to back anyone to gain revenge. Even though it failed it did cause Henry considerable embarrassment and it was for that reason that he finally executed him. The revolt had easily been contained and Warbeck, unlike Simnel, had been unable to force the king into a pitched battle. The greatest challenge was that of Simnel, because it came so soon after Bosworth and forced Henry to fight another battle before he could be certain of support. Nicholas Fellows, Disorder and Rebellion in Tudor England (2001) • Task: • Read through the following extract and complete the following tasks: • Stick in the middle of an A4 sheet and look up/annotate any words you don’t understand • Highlight in one colour anything that is a FACT • Highlight in a second colour anything that is an INTERPRETATION

  9. How convincingis this interpretation in relation to the significance of the Warbeck and Simnel risings? Refer to the extract and use your understanding of the historical context. (25 marks) 1. What is the interpretation (view) of the Simnel and Warbeck rebellions given in the extract? 2. What evidence can you find in the extract to support the argument? TASK: On each table you have been given an A4 sheet with a copy of the same extract and a question I would like you to look at. As a table write down your thoughts and then they will be passed on to the next group. We will then feedback on your ideas to record onto your sheet afterwards. As we feedback make sure you record the notes onto your sheet. 3. What do you know (that is, contextual knowledge) that supports these claims? (Use the information from your handouts and the textbook) 4. What contextual knowledge do you have to contradict these claims? (Is there any information/evidence that suggests a different view?) Is there any evidence to suggest that Warbeck’s rising was more dangerous? 5. Using your judgment, are the arguments in support stronger than the arguments against, or vice versa? Do you agree that the interpretation is convincing? If so, why? If not, why not?

  10. How convincingis this interpretation in relation to the significance of the Warbeck and Simnel risings? Refer to the extract and use your understanding of the historical context. (25 marks) Structuring your answer: Paragraph One: use Qs 1 & 2 Paragraph Two: Q 3 Paragraph Three: Q 4 Paragraph Four: Q 5 Language: “The evidence suggests that…” “It is clear that….” “ It can be seen that…” You are aiming to write a page of A4. Task: Now it’s time to have a go at writing your answer to this question using the extract we have just looked at. Use the writing frame opposite to help you. “You must do the things you think you cannot do” Eleanor Roosevelt

  11. FLIP LEARNING • TASK: • Find definitions for each of the following words: • Nobility • Attainder • Patronage • Retaining • Council Learned in Law • (Some of these words aren’t your typical definition so will need to look at in the context of Henry VII and dealing with his nobility) Your tasks for next lesson are as follows:

More Related