260 likes | 310 Views
Financing The Optimal Cookstove Ted Redelmeier. How can the Optimal Cookstove be Financially Viable?. Gasifier + Rice Husk = <3.
E N D
Working Hypothesis:If(optimal cook stove)Then {(minimize respiratory disease) + (efficient use biomass feedstock) + (carbon sequestration) + (soil restoration) + (rural poverty alleviation)}Optimal Cookstove => Char CreationOptimal Cookstove => Income Generation
“Equal & Opposites” [C+] + [C-] = [C=]
“Equal & Opposites” [C++] = [C++]
“Equal & Opposites” [C++] + [C--] = [C==]
Microfinance: A Couple of Characteristics • Alleviates poverty?? • Reduced transactions costs of serving the poor
The Dilemma of the Inequality The Inequality: $[char as heat and electricity] >=< $[char as C--] and $[char as biochar] No markets for the RHS, wherever there is available woody biomass [char as heat and electricity] is made and there is a local market for charcoal. Therefore no biochar, no carbon sequestration.
EQUAL & OPPOSITES Permanently removes CO2 from the short term carbon cycle Acts to complement C++ activities with C-- activities [C--] is a complement to [C++], facilitates the creation of a universal energy market that is uniformly carbon neutral [C=] and [C==] Carbon “Offsets” vs. Carbon “Equal & Opposites”The Difference Between Substitutes and Complements • OFFSETS • Does nothing to remove CO2 from the short term carbon cycle • Only succeed in changing the rate of C++ activities • Attempt to substitute net or inherently carbon neutral energy for C++ energy;