Residential cookstove

1. Residential cookstove How significant is the SLCP is for the region/country • SLCP (short life in atmosphere) • Climate effects • Deteriorate air quality • BC, O3, CH4, HCFCs • 40 % climate forcing • Effective strategy in term-term climate change • Kitchen smoke 500 Million (potential health hazard) • IGP 2009 (project surya) biofuels (biomass) • Cooking and heating (project surya) • Measurements (indoor and ambient) – observatory in village • Cooking cycle • Traditional cookstove replaced by improved cookstove • Diuranal pattern coinciding cooking hours • BC high during cooking period • Verified during Ramadan • Peaks coming by cooking • Kitchen condition is much verse even some cities • Focus on residential sector • Fan assisted stove and non-fan assisted • Much better combustion in fan assisted • Analysed force draf and traditional cookstove • 50% reduction in improved cookstove compared to traditional • BC concentrations, fuel consumption • Convenience (fuel processing, services) • Health benefits is paramount • 15% for efficiency is called improved cookstove • Be careful of terminology about improved cookstove • Lack of training cause more pollution • BC soot should be focused for climate and health • Heat stove, lighting, and kerocene lamp, all should be focused at national levels and hence need comprehensive approach • Brilliant light (solar light) in addition to IC • SLCP not included in carbon market. C2P2 initiatives in this regrads • Evaluation BC equivalent carbon market through measurement of emission through cellphone • Collaboration with bank • Rolled up 5000 household • Cellphone technology to measure emissions is under experimentation to development methodology

2. Good examples exit –how can they scaled up • Lao PRD • • Lao PRD - 90 % used biofuels • • 3rd phase of cookstoveprogramme • • Developed taskforce for CSI • • World bank supported but welcome CCAC to support • • Fan supported cookstove • • Pilot study, 100 cookstove • • Any any plan expands. Yes, have but exact strategy not known • • Developed cookstove standard • • 3rd phase supported by University of California • Indonesia • • 83% living in rural area • • LPG 12kg to 3kg gas cylinder so people can purchase • • Replacing traditional cooking with LPG • • Government pay money (300 thousand Indo Rupeeya = 30 USD)to poor for purchasing LPG and other purchase • • • Vietnam • • Biomass for cooking and heating • • No have data available about household who is using biomass. But household who use biomass is reducing. • • Poor people use biomass for cooking • • Need standard for cookstove and indoor quality • • For Creating awareness on health and environment health standard needs • • PPP is important for cookstove to make available to rural people • Philiphinnes • • Depends most populations on biomass

3. What are main barriers • Availability of actual data on BC • Local participation needed • Local production • Assessments • Awareness • Availability • Affordability • Sustainability of technology

4. What can be done on the country level • Indonesia: Lack of data on air pollution and BC, haven’t done assessments. • Not priority of government yet. • As per 2011 assessment biomass 60% using biomass cooking.

5. What support is needed from region processes or bodies, the CCAC and others • Technology,, knowledge, finance, • CCAC can work to raise awareness thorough organizing forums • Need right technology to be implement globally and regionally • CCAC can create awareness at policy levels • Health and development connection is more consideration at country level rather than climate.