180 likes | 268 Views
Update on EEP Transition to Federal Mitigation Rule. Safety and Emerging Issues Committee of the Board of Transportation September 2, 2009. Tri-Party. Presentation Overview. Background Application of Federal Rule to EEP Timeline and Next Steps.
E N D
Update on EEP Transition to Federal Mitigation Rule Safety and Emerging Issues Committeeof the Board of Transportation September 2, 2009 Tri-Party
Presentation Overview • Background • Application of Federal Rule to EEP • Timeline and Next Steps
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Is a DENR Program that: Improves the environment --by restoring wetlands, streams and buffers --where the need is greatest -- with willing landowners Supports the NCDOT and other developers -- with mitigation to meet permit needs In a timely, cost effective and efficient manner
EEP Overview • Non-regulatory, receipt-based – no appropriations • State/federal oversight – strict compliance standards • State and national recognition for innovation and environmental excellence
History Four funds: • DOT (Wetlands and Streams) • General Public (Wetlands and Streams) • Buffer mitigation (Tar/Pam, Neuse) • Nutrient Offset (Tar-Pam and Neuse) Tri-Party
History --Launched WRP in 1997 for local government and general public -- Assisted NCDOT in early 2000’s --Retooled in 2003 as Ecosystem Enhancement Program Tri-Party
WRP redesigned as EEP to assist NCDOT In the late 1990’s and early 2000’s project delays were severe for the NCDOT --NEPA, redesign, mitigation (40%) As a result --DOT, DENR and USACE formed a partnership
Total Improvement Processan interagency partnership Merger 01 Workshop NCDOT NCDCM NCDWQ NCWRC NCMF USACE USEPA USFWS Mitigation Workshop
Authority- “instruments” 3-Party MOA 2-Party MOA DOT/DENR/USACEJuly 2003 DOT/DENRApril 2004 Regulatory Document Business Document WWW.NCEEP.NET
2006- 2008 Rulemaking Changes requirements for how mitigation is accomplished for banks, in-lieu programs and permittee provided mitigation.
Application in General • Federal Rule: Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources • Jointly promulgated by EPA, USACE • Draft rule proposed March 2006 • ~ 12,000 comments received • State response from Governor Easley • Signed by NCDOT, NCDOC and NCDENR
Application • Final rule published in April 2008 • Establishes flexible preference hierarchy for mitigation options • Embraces advanced mitigation and watershed planning • EEP must be compliant with new rule on June 9, 2010
Application to EEP • The new rule requires that all in-lieu fee programs develop new “instruments” (MOA) • DOT, DENR and USACE are working on a new instrument with a plan to have it in place by June of next year.
Application of Rule to EEP • Compensation Planning Framework • “Advance” credits • Credit Release Schedules • Hierarchy • Interagency review of new projects
Transition from Current Agreements to Instrument Framework • New Instrument will replace both agreements covering EEP mitigation for streams and wetlands (including MOA) • Existing instrument is available at WWW.NCEEP.NET • Intent is retain key provisions of MOA
Timeline and Next Steps • Developing draft instrument draft with agencies and DOT • Conduct broad review of draft instrument in late October/Early November (Webinar) • Initiate formal review process with USACE in late November (includes public notice and comment) • Finalize and sign in April 2010
Closing comments on instrument • Rules will not affect costs of EEP delivery of mitigation for NCDOT. • Will affect accounting (credits) • Will affect reporting • Will support comprehensive planning • Will recognize the importance of the tri-party relationship for advancing mitigation.
Questions Tri-Party William D. Gilmore, PEbill.gilmore@ncdenr.net