1 / 28

Developing & Implementing Master Bike & Pedestrian Plans

Developing & Implementing Master Bike & Pedestrian Plans. Heleen Dewey Spokane Regional Health District March 2010. Objective. Involve transportation, planning and public health in the development of master bike and pedestrian plans. Public Health & Planning. A story. About Spokane.

winfred
Download Presentation

Developing & Implementing Master Bike & Pedestrian Plans

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing & ImplementingMaster Bike & Pedestrian Plans Heleen Dewey Spokane Regional Health District March 2010

  2. Objective • Involve transportation, planning and public health in the development of master bike and pedestrian plans

  3. Public Health & Planning • A story

  4. About Spokane

  5. About Spokane • 2008 Spokane County population 459,000 (estimate) • City of Spokane largest jurisdiction at 204,400 Our health and activity level? • 60% of County residents overweight or obese • Fewer than half of all adults and children get recommended levels of physical activity

  6. 2006 Non-Motorized Transportation Study • Average commute is a half-mile for walkers and 1½ for bikers • 1% of trips by bike (2% nationally) • 9% of trips by walking (same as nation) • 42% of children are driven [1] Nonmortorized Transportation Pilot Program Evaluation Study. University of Minnesota. 2007. Communities surveyed: Marin County, CA; Minneapolis, MN, Sheboygan, WI, Columbia, MO, and Spokane, WA

  7. How Spokane got started… • 2004 -$3500 annual grant for 5-years from WSDOT/WSDOH in cooperation with CDC • Co-facilitated by Spokane Regional Health District and City of Spokane • Task Force made up of professionals, advocates, and agency representatives • Facilitated a series of events/workshops • Educated elected officials

  8. Active Living Symposium • Education on connecting public health and planning specific to our community Outcomes: • City of Spokane Plan Commission reviews Comprehensive Plan for healthy community policies • Illustrated then Councilwoman Verner’s 2007 Quality of Life resolution

  9. Connecting the City • Generate ideas and support to develop a stronger non-motorized plan within the City of Spokane • Identify priority projects and effective policy/regulatory intervention • Existing plan not implemented and needed updating • Lack of clarity in non-motorized transportation planning (funding, RTPO involvement, priorities) • More communication/collaboration among different user groups

  10. Outcome of Workshop • Enforce development standards • Bike/Pedestrian coordinator • Impact fees • Bike boulevards • Stripe streets • Route across river • Sidewalks • Fill gaps • Need pedestrian plans

  11. Spokane Regional Pedestrian Plan • 3-year DOH Preventative Health Block Grant • Focus to incorporate physical activity policies into community pedestrian planning documents • First year Regional; Guidance document provided by Spokane Regional Transportation Council. • City of Spokane planning • Smaller jurisdictions in the county • Complete Streets education

  12. Pedestrian Plan - Process • Included a community process with multiple agencies • Analyzed current data • Surveyed residents • Surveyed planners/engineers in jurisdictions • Draft plan in a team approach

  13. Residents Survey Barriers to pedestrian travel: • Lack of crosswalks • No sidewalks, sidewalks in disrepair, gaps and snow removal needed • Lack of lighting • Poor driver behaviors • School issues, too much traffic near schools and moving too fast thru neighborhoods

  14. Planner Engineer Survey Barriers to implementing pedestrian facilities: • Inadequate funding • Lack of staffing and training • Lack of pedestrian inventory/network • Lack of understanding of health & economic benefits of walking • Consideration for disabled users

  15. GOALS

  16. GOAL 1: Support all levels of pedestrian travel by developing plans, projects, and programs

  17. GOAL 2: Design & implement changes in the infrastructure to increase pedestrian safety and connectivity

  18. GOAL 3: Support the planning, funding, & public knowledge of integrated networks of paved pedestrian paths that serve as an alternative to roadways & facilitate non-motorized travel to and through neighborhoods, shopping, parks, schools, & transit accessible areas.

  19. GOAL 4: Improve actual & perceived pedestrian safety & security

  20. GOAL 5: Support all pedestrian travel to improve physical health & slow obesity & chronic disease

  21. GOAL 6: Pursue funding to maintain, enhance & expand pedestrian facilities.

  22. GOAL 7: Increase the number of school children who walk to school by 2% from 26% to 28%

  23. Other key public health recommendations • Regionally significant project list • Complete street policies • Functional trail connections • Support transit use & linkages to transit

  24. Insights • Understanding each other’s goals, needs, strengths • Clearinghouse • Quiet catalyst – could seed the project, didn’t have to own it • Capacity – education, outreach, new Ideas • Unintentional succession plan • Timing – health, smart growth, gas prices, sustainability, economics/market demands, political climate, grassroots • Another face for funding requests • Rediscover the connections between planning and public health

  25. Next steps… • Quiet Catalyst - partnerships • YMCA Pioneering Healthier Communities • SmartRoutes 2010 • Lands Council • Complete streets resolution – Board of Health • Active Technical Transportation Committee • Health impact assessment training • Active Living Leadership • Elected officials

  26. Heleen Dewey Physical Activity & Nutrition Program 509-324-1555 hdewey@spokanecounty.org

More Related