1 / 48

An Important Aspect of Human Socialization is

An Important Aspect of Human Socialization is. The need for “contact comfort” from others. Prof. Tamara Arrington University of Kentucky COM 252. So, the need to touch these are perceptible. The need is so strong, you feel the need within you. Need for Contact Comfort:.

Download Presentation

An Important Aspect of Human Socialization is

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Important Aspect of Human Socialization is The need for “contact comfort” from others. Prof. Tamara Arrington University of Kentucky COM 252

  2. So, the need to touch these are perceptible. The need is so strong, you feel the need within you.

  3. Need for Contact Comfort: • These people are touching each other! • Note their age. • Note their color. • Note the genders. • Does it feel good?

  4. Need for Contact Comfort: • These people are touching. • Note their age. • Note their color. • Note the genders. • Does it feel good?

  5. Need for Contact Comfort: • These people are touching each other.

  6. Need for Contact Comfort: • These people are touching each other. • Note their ages. • They are males. • Does it feel good?

  7. Need for Contact Comfort:

  8. Need for Contact Comfort: • So, what would happen it we did not get enough contact comfort while we were developing our personalities as children?

  9. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • BA and PhD in psychology from Stanford Univ. (1930) • 1930 joined faculty Univ. of Wisconsin • 1931 established Psychology Primate Lab • A Science Odyssey (1998). http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entires/bharl.html

  10. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • “Harlow was intrigued by love.” • He questioned the, then current, theory that love began as a feeding bond with themother and applied by extension to other family members. • In 1957, he began his, now famous, study of rhesus monkeys. • A Science Odyssey (1998). http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entires/bharl.html

  11. Harry Harlow • Nonhuman primates can offer tremendous insights into human development. • Of all animals, apes and monkey are the most closely related to humans behaviorally, anatomically, and physiologically. • Rhesus monkeys share over90% of their genes with those of humans. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, January 30) http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm

  12. Harry Harlow • Rhesus monkeys and other primates offer researchers invaluable opportunities to study the longitudinal effects of touch over the course of generations. • These animals age from birth to maturity (onset of puberty) in 3 or 4 years, instead of 15 to 20 years, as is the case with humans. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, January 30) http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm

  13. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • He took baby rhesus monkeys from their mothers shortly after birth.

  14. Harry Harlow in his primate lab at the University of Wisconsin, with Rhesus monkeys, in a 1964 photo. (Nina Leen / Timelife Pictures)

  15. Harlow, shown in 1965 with an infant monkey and one of his milk-bearing wire surrogates.

  16. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • A surrogate (substitute) mother was given to the baby monkeys • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  17. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • And a wire mother was also provided • Wirehad food • Cloth had no food • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  18. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • The monkey preferred the cloth mother to the extent that it clung to the cloth mother while eating. • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  19. Harlow discovered that baby monkeys deprived of their mothers (left) would transfer their affections to a cloth surrogate. When they needed to eat, they would scamper over to a milk-bearing wire mother, but then quickly return to cuddle with the softer surrogate. (Images courtesy of Harlow Primate Laboratory / University of Wisconsin, Madison)

  20. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • RESULTS OF THE EXPERIMENT All the rhesus monkeys raised in isolation were • Fearful • Easily frightened • Did not mate • Those artificially inseminated became abusive mothers • Schaefer, R.T. (2001). Sociology (7th ed). Boston: McGraw Hill.

  21. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • RESULTS OF THE EXPERIMENT cont. • “The infants developed “autistic-like”syndrome, with grooming, self-clasping, social withdrawal and rocking.” • The Why Files. (1999). The Science of Mother’s Day. University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. • http://whyfiles.org/087mother/4.html

  22. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • Harlow used this bear for the fear test. When Harlow put this in the cage with the isolated monkeys, they were afraid. • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  23. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • The typicalresponse in the fear test was to cling to the cloth mother. (not the wire mother with the food) • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  24. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • Testing responses to strange objects. A crumpled piece of paper. • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  25. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • Object responsewas exploration in presence of cloth mother • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  26. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • Objectresponse when surrogate mother is removed. • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  27. Harry Harlow 1905-1981 • Another test. • Babies taken from surrogate mothers and put in box alone with option of different doors to open. • They responded with great preference for the picture of the cloth mother. • Harlow, H. “The Nature of Love in Green, C. (2000, March). Classicsin the History ofPsychology. Toronto, Ontario: York University

  28. What are the “implications” for humans that can be made?

  29. Can there be similarities?

  30. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • Parental contact is absolutely critical to infants’ psychosocial well-being. Critical = absolutely necessary….won’t happen without it. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm

  31. We know that in the Human Socialization Process: • Simple, systematic massage of premature infants can increase their weight by as much as 47%. • Term infants receiving regular massage gain more weight and develop better sleep patterns. • Uninterrupted support during women’s labor (both touch & emotional) results in significant decreases in cesarean sections and epidural rates. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm

  32. We know that in the Human Socialization Process: • Researchers have long noted a depression-likeresponse by infants to the absence of parental contact. • Following WW II, Spitz coined the term “anaclitic depression” to describe the clinical response of human infants to prolonged maternal separation. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm

  33. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • Monkey infants who were denied contact – a “secure base” ceased to explore their environments. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm • Implication: Depression in human children would result in lack of exploration of their environments which has implications for learning

  34. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • Longitudinal studies of rhesus monkeys indicate that mother-infant bonding practices are repeated and reinforced from generation to generation. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm • Implication: The kind of bonding you received as a child will influence the kind of bonding you would have with a child of your own and they likewise and…on, and on,…and on..

  35. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • Touch was more important to monkey infants than anything else they could receive from their mothers or mother surrogate – including food. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm • Implication: A father caring for an infant should be just as effective as mother . • Or, adoptive parents should be just as effective as the biological parent.

  36. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • Deficits in early touch contact lead to behavioral and physiological problems that are both short – and long-term. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm • Implication: Infant touch deprivation may have lifelong effects on social behaviors.

  37. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • As adolescents and adults, rhesus monkeys reared in tactile isolation actively avoided most social contact. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm • Could this contribute to social isolation in humans?

  38. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • As adolescents and adults, rhesus monkeys reared in tactile isolation tended to be hyper aggressive in the infrequent social interactions, habitually exhibiting behaviors similar to “anger” and “depression” • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm • Could this be contributing to the many incidents of hyper aggression in the youth today?

  39. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • Adolescent and adult rhesus monkeys reared in tactile isolation developed gross abnormalities in sexual behavior. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm • Could this be a contributing factor to gross sexual behaviors in humans?

  40. Implications For The Human Socialization Process • By reinstating physical contact for touch-derived monkey infants, in some cases, abnormal behaviors can be diminishedconsiderably. • Continuing Nursing Education Credit. “The Power of Touch in Labor and Infancy”. (Retrieved 2001, Janaury 30). http://www.eddesign.com/jjsite/introduc.htm • Could we, give contact comfort to neglected people and reduce their abnormal behaviors. • Could someone help reduce our abnormal behaviors by giving contact comfort to us?

  41. Mary Carlson • Mary Carlson, associate professor or neuroscience and psychology at Harvard Medical School says the …infant monkeys develop what she called an “autistic-like” syndrome with grooming, self-clasping, social withdrawal and rocking. • (1999). The Science of Mother's Day. University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. http://whyfiles.org/087mother/4.html

  42. Carlson • Carlson says the theme of Harlow’s work is that “you are not really a monkey unless you were raised in an interactive monkeyenvironment.” • (1999). The Science of Mother's Day. University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. • A major premise of communication: Our Our human behaviors are shaped by the groups to which we belong and the interactions that occur within those groups.

  43. Carlson • If Harlow’s monkey experiment was cruel to monkeys. What about the human deprivation in Romanian orphanages, where communist dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu was skeptical of all things touchy-feelie and therefore clamped down on social work and favored policies to raise thebirth rateand established institutions fororphans and children whose parents could not care for them. • (1999). The Science of Mother's Day. University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. http://whyfiles.org/087mother/4.html

  44. Carlson • After Ceausescu was executed in the coup in 1989. The orphanages were opened to a world that saw warehouses for the unwanted. • The children were in the third to tenth percentilefor physical growth, and “grossly delayed” in motor and mental development. • They rocked and grasped themselves like Harlow’s monkeys, and grew up with weird social values and behaviors. • (1999). The Science of Mother's Day. University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. http://whyfiles.org/087mother/4.html

  45. Carlson • Chemical analysis showed abnormal cortisol profiles, indicating sever problems with the stress response. • A study by Carlson of Romanian children in poor-quality day care, had abnormal cortisol during the week, but when returned home for the weekend, it looked closer to normal than when at the day care. • (1999). The Science of Mother's Day. University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. http://whyfiles.org/087mother/4.html

  46. Carlson • As the orphans aged, many became homeless, with what Carlson calls “clumsy, sad, all inappropriate” social interactions. • To express affection, one boy might kiss another – on top of the head. • The youths were smiling and ingratiating and superficially friendly but unable to form permanent attachments. • (1999). The Science of Mother's Day. University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. http://whyfiles.org/087mother/4.html

  47. Carlson • To Carlson, the Romanian research has another implication. The consistent relationship between poor care and abnormal cortisol raises the question of whats happening to American children in poor day care? • (1999). The Science of Mother's Day. University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. http://whyfiles.org/087mother/4.html

  48. Barry Brazelton • Q. Is day care good for children? • A. can be. It had better be. It isn’t at present. Over 60% of children are in child care you or I wouldn’t trust.

More Related