250 likes | 368 Views
Developing and Supporting Online Learning in a Traditional UK Polytechnic University: A view from the middle. Rachel Forsyth, Learning and Teaching Unit, Manchester Metropolitan University. Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU). approx. 31,000 students
E N D
Developing and Supporting Online Learning in a Traditional UK Polytechnic University:A view from the middle Rachel Forsyth, Learning and Teaching Unit, Manchester Metropolitan University
Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU) • approx. 31,000 students • 60% undergraduate, 40% postgraduate • 66% full-time; 34% part-time • 40% of full-time students >21 when they begin • 2000 staff, of whom about 1200 teaching staff (mostly full-time)
MMU: Mission “to provide high-quality learning opportunities for all our students and establish a reputation for the provision of excellent, varied and innovative teaching and learning”.
Major Issues for MMU recruitment and retention widening participation
Learning and Teaching Unit Responsible for implementation of Learning and Teaching Strategy Established September 2000 (Head: Professor Fred Lockwood) 3 members of academic staff 1 web developer
Dispersed Team MMU campus My office
First online course 1996 (Certificate in Open and Distance Learning) In-house system for bulletin boards, student home pages, assignment submission etc Excellent for small numbers of students and one or two courses at a time First online steps at MMU
WebCT 1998: 3 courses 1999: 90 courses (most in development) 2000: 165 active courses, 170 in development 2001: (projected) 300 courses managed by 160 academic staff
WebCT WebCT
Reasons for Growth • internal project: fellowship • ‘zeitgeist’ - the time is right • lack of foresight
Online Fellowship Scheme • eight weeks, full-time online learning innovation • 24 lecturers over two years • awarded by application and interview • intensive support before, during and after • funding dependent on beginning, completing, implementing and evaluating.
Open system for access to WebCT • any lecturer can obtain a “Development Area” • supported by online course and other materials • internal WebCT developers mailing list • technical support mailing list • developed courses emerge from Development Area after a quality check
Overview of WebCT usage 9th August 2000 - 18th June 2001 • 1.8m pages requested (average 5,778 per day) • 3.9m data item requests • busiest month: January (317,800 requests for pages)
How is WebCT used? • 69% of requests from on campus • 31% of requests from off campus • requests from 28 international domains
How far have we come? • 6,000 students, 100 developers • increasing interest from course teams, moving away from the “individual enthusiast” paradigm • most staff development takes place online • all technical support via email
Problems: our unit 1.5 academic staff (2 from 1 September) with other tasks 0.4 technical staff No hardware/software budget Academic staff doing technical jobs
Problems: institutional No institutional policy on online learning No institutional resources for online learning Seven campuses, seven faculties No integration with management information systems Not enough emphasis on student learning
Persuade the Directorate to adopt a strategy Put hardware support into central information systems Devolve training and technical support to faculty level Reorganise existing resources (us) Work towards a managed learning environment Strategy
Staff Development Online 1998/99: same workshops offered in two modes: • face to face - typically one full day (113 participants) • online - typically one hour per week for six weeks (96 participants)
Outcomes • face to face: • no change, everyone who turned up completed everything • online: • 15% completed everything • 70% completed most tasks • 15% ‘attended’ once then never again
Marking Course administration Teaching Paper to be written Staff Development Student with problem Institutional administration Colleague wanting to discuss something Typical demands: what are your daily priorities?
New Course Design • 6 hours over 2 days • Compulsory ‘meetings’ at 10am and 2pm each day • Structured activities • Group work