460 likes | 474 Views
Explore Heinrich Schenker's harmonic and structural analysis of Beethoven's Piano Sonata Op. 2 No. 1 in F minor. Understand Schenker's concepts of harmony, embellishment, counterpoint, melody, and tonality.
E N D
Thinking and HearingSchenker-Style: Introduction to the Ideas of Heinrich Schenker
Beethoven Piano Sonata, Op. 2, no. 1 in f minor, (1st movement)
Opening Harmonic Progression(Conventional Theory Explanation) Vŀ_____________ I_______________ I VII6or VŁ II6 V I6 I Vŀ I VII6 I6 II6 V or VŁ How many harmonies in this passage?
I. Schenker’s View of Harmony Opening Progression (Schenkerian Explanation) N Tonic(I) Nb harmony P harm. Dom(V) Tonic Tonic Interm. a.k.a Divider (Divides I-V span)
I. Schenker’s View of Harmony I II6 V tonic prolongation divider dom. #1: Harmonic Prolongation: Progressions ≠ strings of chords, but means of prolonging more basic harmonies. #2: “Chords” vs. “Harmonies” (Beethoven passage therefore has 7 chords, but only 3 real harmonies) #3 Linear Embellishments: Most chords not harmonic, but have contrapuntal or melodic functions (neigh., pass., etc.)
I. Schenker’s View of Harmony What else would interest Schenker about the bass, mm. 1-8? ^1______ ^2 ^3 ^4 ^5 #4. Schenker Theory is a melodic/contrapuntal theory. (It sees chord as secondary to melody).
II. Schenker’s Concept of Embellishment and Structural Layers
II. Schenker’s Concept of Embellishment and Structural Layers Arpeggiation #5: Linearizing or Composing-Out: Melodies linearize chords (often in much more subtle ways!)
II. Schenker’s Concept of Embellishment and Structural Layers Chordal Skip Arpeggiation PT NN #6: Structure vs. Ornament: Schenker theory recognizes a distinction btw. structural tones and ornamental tones(diminutions).
II. Schenker’s Concept of Embellishment and Structural Layers Chordal Skip PT NN #7. Variation without a Theme Great works are like a Variationonan unannounced theme
II. Schenker’s Concept of Structural Layers Foreground Middleground “Background” NN ? NN #8. Structural Depth and Structural Layers: great music has structural depth; behind embellished surface lurks deep structure or background (structural layers=foreground, middleground, background).
III. Schenker’s Concept of Counterpoint
III. Schenker’s Concept of Counterpoint • Viewed conventionally, does the right hand melody move: • only by step, • only by leap, • or a combination of steps and leaps? What is the melodic function of this bĚ (how does it relate to c)? b& inflects c as lower NN
III. Schenker’s Concept of Counterpoint #9: Melodic Fluency Structural lines (middle/background) are melodically fluent—move mostly stepwise & recover leaps
III. Schenker’s Concept of Counterpoint Find the melod- ically fluent line in the “jumpy” bass starting here:
Find the melodically fluent Schenkerian line in the upper voice:
III. Schenker’s Concept of Counterpoint Combine the 2 fluent lines. What does this remind you of? pt
III. Schenker’s Concept of Counterpoint pt #10: Outer-Voice Contrapuntal Framework In great music, the middle/background, esp. outer voices, resembles strict species counterpoint: • Elegantly fluent lines • Dissonance subordinate to consonance • Follow rules of strict voice leading
III. Schenker’s Concept of Counterpoint Corollary: Beneath irregular foreground with leaps, Dissonance, etc: is a regular background of strict counterpoint: pt
IV. Schenker’s Concept of Melody Assuming fluent structural lines, where does LT, e& resolve? ? Soprano Alto pt 3rd 6th 5th 3rd 6th 5th unfolded unfolded unfolded #11: Compoundmelody or polyphonic melody: Single-line melodies w/ leaps often imply 2 or more voices.
V. Schenker’s View of Tonality
Conventional View of Tonal Form in minor key sonata form Exposition 1. First theme in _________ 2. Modulation to second theme__________ 3. Closing theme also in _____________ Development • Tonally unstable, eventually retransition leads • via __________ back to ___________ Recapitulation 1. First theme in ___________ 2. Second theme in_________ 3. Closing theme in__________
Establish Tonic Modulate to Relative Major Modulate through a series of remote keys, Eventually modulate via V back to tonic End in Tonic
V. Schenker’s View of Tonality #12: Schenker rejects the idea of modulation. (e.g., regards minor-key sonata form as one expansive progression, I-III-V-I in the tonic key)
V. Schenker’s View of Tonality #13: The Fundamental Progression = I-V-I The trek from I-V is music’s natural law. Tonal composition = the prolongation or composing-out of the fundamental progression.
V. Schenker’s View of Tonality #14. Bassbrechung (the breaking of the bass) = The funda- mental progression I-V-I is itself a prolongation of the tonic. = #15. The ascending 5th of the Bassbrechung creates I-V tonal space that is often filled via dividers (II, III, IV or related harmonies)
VI. Schenker’s Concept of Motive What is the most important motive in mm. 1-8? 3rd-prg. #16: To Schenker, motives often = middleground melodic patterns rather than rhythmic surface
V. Schenker’s Concept of Motive Can you find a 6th-progression elsewhere on p. 1? There’s something very interesting about that 6th-prg.
Opening fills in span of a 6th, C-EĚ = ^5to ^7 in f minor • Mm. 16-20 fill in 6th span, ^E@ -G = 5 to ^7 in A@ (relative Maj) 6-prg 6-prg 6-prg.
V. Schenker’s Concept of Motive Can you find additional appearances of the Schenkerian motive (6th-prg. ^5-^7, E@-G) on page 1?
V. Schenker’s Concept of Motive Remember ME? What do you notice about my melodic shape? =Same Linear Descent of a 6th: ^5-^7 (C-E&) as opening
V. Schenker’s Concept of Motive Remember ME, too?? Holy S&*^! another Linear Descent of a 6th: ^5-^7 (C-E&) #17: Great music is unified by motives below the surface level (motivic parallelism).
Bottom Line:Schenker developed some of the most elegant and powerful theories of tonal music
III. Schenker’s Concept of Counterpoint Why does Beethoven use the RH sf markings in this passage?