410 likes | 422 Views
This paper examines the policy challenge of raising tobacco taxes, the benefits for public health, concerns of policymakers, revenue generation potential, and the impact on employment and smuggling. It provides evidence from global, regional, and Hungarian experiences.
E N D
Tobacco Control PolicyThe Challenge of Raising Tobacco Taxes Global, Regional and Hungarian Experience By Ayda A. Yurekli, Ph.D World Bank Tobacco Dissemination Meeting, Budapest, Hungary 2001
Why is Raising Tobacco Taxes a Policy Challenge? • Tobacco taxes are NOT new taxes • Challenging, because • Public health wants higher taxes, and • Policy makers are worried about the consequences of higher taxes to the economy as a whole.
Why are higher taxes good for public health? • Change Smoking Behavior • As tax increases consumption decreases • A 10% increase in price reduces consumption by: • 4% in developed countries, • 8% in developing countries • Poor and Youth are more sensitive • A 10% price increase reduce smoking as much as 10% among youth and the poor. • Deter youth taking up smoking • High opportunity costs • Higher budget share for other goods and services
Price Elasticity EvidenceAs tax increases, consumption decreasesEvidence from South Africa
Allocating Tobacco Expenditure to Other Goods and ServicesBetter Nutrition, Better Health
Why do policy makers worry?Will increasing tobacco taxes: • reduce revenues? • Tobacco is a good source of generating revenues • Excise +VAT tax revenues • Import tariffs • Income taxes • cause job losses • Create employment opportunities • In agriculture- farmers- and industry • accelerate smuggling activities? • Means less revenues, • more criminal activities
Revenue Generating Potential of Tobacco TaxesEconomic Argument • Production, distribution, and sales can be closely supervised by the government. • Demand is price-inelastic (i.e., as price rises, consumption falls by less than the percentage rise in the price). • The income elasticity of demand is greater than one, meaning higher the income, higher the consumption, and greater the revenue.
Revenue Generating Potential of Tobacco TaxesEmpirical Argument Depends on several factors. • Consumption level • Tobacco tax rates, • Retail price of cigarettes • Income • Control for smuggling activities
Tobacco Tax Rates and PricesWhere Hungary fits in the Globe!
Global (European) Evidence:Total and Excise Tobacco Taxes as % of Retail Price 2000 Total tobacco tax= Excise+VAT, Excise = (Specific+Ad Valorem)
Regional Evidence: Total and Excise Tobacco Taxes as % of Retail Price
Hungarian Evidence:Total and Excise Tobacco Taxes as % of Retail Price
Hungarian Evidence:Tobacco Excise Revenues and % Share in Total Tax Revenues
Has the tobacco tax revenue been increasing in Hungary? Nominal vs. Real Revenue
Impact of Increased Taxesto the Economy • Higher and increasing revenues • Not necessarily increasing Smuggling, • Unemployment? • Check other factors
Evidence from Hungary: Since 1997 higher the real tax rate, higher the revenue
Smuggling: Large scale organized smuggling • Tends to avoid taxes not invades • Grows due to • Public tolerance • Lack of control • Corruption level of the country • The complicity of the industry • Finds presence of organized crime • Uses internationally well-known brands
Smuggling: What is the Solution?Canadian Government reduced tobacco tax rates dramatically in February 1993
Smuggling Sweden decreased cigarette taxes (17%) due to fear of smuggling in 1998
Recommendations to control smuggling • Require that all cigarette exporters, manufacturers and distributors have a license and keep detailed records • Make cigarette exporters post a bond that will only be returned when it is proven that the cigarettes have reached their final destination: and • Require that unique markings be placed on cigarette packages so that smuggled cigarettes can be traced back to their source.
SummaryWhy increase tobacco taxes • Good for public health • Improve health outcomes • Change smoking behavior • Youth and the poor are more sensitive • Increase budget share for other goods and services • Good for economy • Generate revenues • Won’t necessarily reduce the employment • Won’t necessarily increase smuggling