1 / 22

Legal Challenge to ARV Therapy Costs in South Africa

Explore the legal challenge to high antiretroviral therapy costs, impacting HIV/AIDS patients. Learn about complainants, respondents, and legal requirements.

wolfordp
Download Presentation

Legal Challenge to ARV Therapy Costs in South Africa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Price of Life A Legal Challenge to the Cost of Antiretroviral Therapies in South Africa Jonathan Berger Law & Treatment Access Unit AIDS Law Project University of the Witwatersrand SOUTH AFRICA Friday, November 21st 2003 Faculty of Law University of Toronto

  2. Overview of presentation • Complaint to the Competition Commission • What is the complaint? • Why challenge private sector prices? • Who are the complainants and the respondents? • What must be proved? • Conceptualising the role of legal action • Building a case, building a coalition • Completing unfinished business • Engaging the Commission, increasing legal options

  3. Contextualising the complaint: using the law to increase access

  4. Contextualising the complaint:old habits die hard

  5. Contextualising the complaint: government comes to the table

  6. Overview of presentation • Complaint to the Competition Commission • What is the complaint? • Why challenge private sector prices? • Who are the complainants and the respondents? • What must be proved? • Conceptualising the role of legal action • Building a case, building a coalition • Completing unfinished business • Engaging the Commission, increasing legal options

  7. What is the complaint? • GlaxoSmithKline and Boehringer Ingelheim have “engaged in excessive pricing of ARVs to the detriment of consumers”, which is “directly responsible for the premature, predictable and avoidable deaths of people living with HIV/AIDS, including both children and adults” • In contravention of section 8(a) of the Competition Act, 89 of 1998

  8. Why challenge private sector prices? Annual cost per patient per drug (exclusive of VAT and markup) (Based on exchange rate of US$1 = ZAR 8, with prices as of 19 September 2002)

  9. Overview of presentation • Complaint to the Competition Commission • What is the complaint? • Why challenge private sector prices? • Who are the complainants and the respondents? • What must be proved? • Conceptualising the role of legal action • Building a case, building a coalition • Completing unfinished business • Engaging the Commission, increasing legal options

  10. Complainants and respondents • Complainants • People living openly with HIV/AIDS • Hazel Tau, Nontsikelelo Zwedala, Sindiswa Godwana, Isaac Skosana and Paul Ngubane (deceased) • Health care workers • Sr Sue Roberts, Dr William Mmbara, Dr Steve Andrews and Dr Francois Venter • Organised labour and civil society • COSATU, CEPPWAWU, TAC and the AIDS Consortium • Respondents • GlaxoSmithKline (UK) and associated companies • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) and associated companies

  11. Overview of presentation • Complaint to the Competition Commission • What is the complaint? • Why challenge private sector prices? • Who are the complainants and the respondents? • What must be proved? • Conceptualising the role of legal action • Building a case, building a coalition • Completing unfinished business • Engaging the Commission, increasing legal options

  12. What must be proved? • Charging “a price for a good or service which – (aa) bears no reasonable relation to the economic value of that good or service; and (bb) is higher than the value … in (aa)” • What makes up the economic value? • Manufacturing costs • R&D costs (where applicable) • Licensing costs (where applicable) • Reasonable profits

  13. Adult formulations: one cap or tab (Based on exchange rate of US$1 = ZAR 10.50, applicable at time complaint lodged)

  14. Paediatric formulations: 100ml (Based on exchange rate of US$1 = ZAR 10.50, applicable at time complaint lodged)

  15. Overview of presentation • Complaint to the Competition Commission • What is the complaint? • Why challenge private sector prices? • Who are the complainants and the respondents? • What must be proved? • Conceptualising the role of legal action • Building a case, building a coalition • Completing unfinished business • Engaging the Commission, increasing legal options

  16. Building a case, building a coalition • Diversity of complainants • Different but related interests and needs • Personal, professional and public interest • Diversity of experts • Medical • Public, private and not-for-profit sector practice • Adults and children • Provision and management • Number crunching • Actuarial science and health economics • Consumer protection

  17. Overview of presentation • Complaint to the Competition Commission • What is the complaint? • Why challenge private sector prices? • Who are the complainants and the respondents? • What must be proved? • Conceptualising the role of legal action • Building a case, building a coalition • Completing unfinished business • Engaging the Commission, increasing legal options

  18. Despite … • Global campaign for access • PMA v Mandela • Price reductions • Preferential pricing • Doha Declaration • UN Guidelines on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights: Revised Guideline 6 ARVs still inaccessible!!!

  19. Overview of presentation • Complaint to the Competition Commission • What is the complaint? • Why challenge private sector prices? • Who are the complainants and the respondents? • What must be proved? • Conceptualising the role of legal action • Building a case, building a coalition • Completing unfinished business • Engaging the Commission, increasing legal options

  20. Engaging the Commission, increasing legal options • PMA v Mandela • Friend of the court • Litigation as mobilisation • Support of access-friendly legislation and state fulfillment of constitutional obligations • TAC v Minister of Health • Challenge to state’s failure to fulfill obligations • State’s obligations to increase access at all levels • Tau v GSK • Independent investigation into abuse of monopoly

  21. And now? • Investigation completed • Decision to refer • Settlement negotiations • Referral if unsuccessful • Stop the practice! • Administrative fine • Class action for damages • Licenses?

  22. Contact details Jonathan Berger Law & Treatment Access Unit AIDS Law Project University of the Witwatersrand SOUTH AFRICA +27(0)11.717-8627 (t) +27(0)11.403-2341 (f) +27(0)83.419-5779 (m) bergerj@law.wits.ac.za www.alp.org.za

More Related