280 likes | 396 Views
SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS BOLIVIA VERONA 200 1. SDA 2000. SDA 2001. Model. V=R-CC (Cuban Methodology). Inexistent. Methodology. Quantitative and Qualitative. Quantitative PCA-Clustering. Variables Used SDA 2000. Drought. Frost. Flooding. Agricultural Potential. Forest Potential.
E N D
SDA 2000 SDA 2001 Model V=R-CC (Cuban Methodology) Inexistent Methodology Quantitative and Qualitative Quantitative PCA-Clustering
Proportion of the population that seeks medical attention at health centers
Gap of unsatisfied basic needs between indigenous and Spanish speaking families
RISK OF UNEMPLOYMENT AND INFORMAL ACTIVITIES FOR CITIES
Outcome Indicators • Poverty Index (% of the population) • Income US$ PPA • Human Development Index • Unsatisfied Basic Needs (% of population) • Development index, relative to gender (gap between men and women)
IndependentIndicators • Proportion of the population with access to drinkable water • Number of doctors by population • Proportion of the population that seeks medical attention at traditional doctors • Proportion of the population that seeks medical attention at health centers • Accumulation of persons in • Population with shortage inadequate or improvised • Shortage of Services • Shortage of Sanitation Services • Shortage of Energy • Shortage of Education • Shortage of Access to Health Facilities • School attendance (measured in years)
Number of Primary Schools • Number of pupils at primary schools • Expenditures of municipalities in maternal care • Gap of unsatisfied basic needs between Indigenous and Spanish speaking families • Total consultations per capita • Number of health posts • Number of basic support hospitals • Number of support hospitals • Number of service schools (pre-primary) • Number of pre-primary registered pupils • Number of service schools (secondary) • Number of secondary registered pupils
Number of service schools (superior) Number of superior registered pupils Number of service schools (alternative) Number of alternative registered pupils Total Investment in Agriculture 1994 Total Investment in Health 1994 Total Investment in Education 1994 Total Investment in basic reparation 1994 Total Investment in Agriculture 1995 Total Investment in Health 1995 Total Investment in Education 1995 Total Investment in basic reparation 1995 Total Investment in Agriculture 1996 Total Investment in Health 1996
Total Investment in Education 1996 Total Investment in basic reparation 1996 Total Investment in Agriculture 1997 Total Investment in Health 1997 Total Investment in Education 1997 Total Investment in basic reparation 1997 Total number of policlinics Access to fluvial drainage 1994 Access to disposition of solid waste 1994 Number of industrial establishments Number of financial establishments Expenditures of municipios in gender related activities Estimated number of organizations
DescriptiveIndicators Average altitude Average yearly rainfall Degree of urbanization Population density Urban NBI (population with unsatisfied basic needs) Rural NBI Population with satisfied basic needs (%) Population living at the threshold of poverty (%) Population living in moderated poverty (%) Indigent population (%) Marginal population (%)
SDA 2000 SDA 2001 Advantages Easy to: Understand Establish the difference between a poverty map and traditional studies on food security Technically accepted. Problems Technically “questionable” Quality of the Information Hard to understand for the government autorities Not easy to establish the differences between poverty map and others Information/ Qual/MVal
SDA 2000 SDA 2001 Process Broad and continuing participation of partners. Results broadly disseminated Without participation Advantages Results: Technically Validated Accepted and used (EBRP) We can easily continue changing the results Impact WFP positioned as expert in Food Security. WFP positioned as expert in Food Security Problems Institutionalisation Appropriation of results.
Results General: Same Detail: Some differences Why? High correlations in the variables used in the SDA 2001. Weighting by population in the SDA 2001