360 likes | 377 Views
This paper explores some methodological issues in implementing the Sydney School Genre Pedagogy in tertiary contexts, focusing on areas such as discipline-specific literacy, academic genres, and pathways for developing control of genre. It also examines tutor training and the use of modelling and joint construction in teaching genres.
E N D
Methodological issuesfor SFL’s Sydney School Genre Pedagogy in tertiary contextsSally HumphreyShoshana Dreyfus
Some issues 1 • Development our understandings of: • Discipline specific literacy • academic genres • discipline & program specific genre pathways • pathways for developing control of genre (stratal and metafunctional) • tutor training: building a theoretically grounded toolkit
Some issues 2 • Modelling • How far can genre take us? • Where does phase ‘fit’ in terms of strata • What mark does a model get? • .
Some issues 3 • Joint Construction • operationalising a model designed in primary school contexts • joint construction online • How and whether to design Joint Construction in terms of macro-generic stages and phases
Some issues 1 • Development our understandings of: • Discipline specific literacy • academic genres • discipline & program specific genre pathways • pathways for developing control of genre (stratal and metafunctional) • tutor training: building a theoretically grounded toolkit
horizontalknowledge structures hierarchical knowledge structures • 1.1: Understanding discipline specific literacy Knowledge structures of the Academic Domain (Bernstein 1996)
Knowledge structures as complementarities ? (after Muller 2007, Wignell 2007, Martin, Maton & Matruglio forthcoming)
hierarchical • Biology: 3rd Year • Biology – 1st Year • Abstract • Introduction • Identification of phenomenon • Summary of research findings • Justify own research • Hypothesis • Objectives • Materials and methods • Results (verbal x visual ) • Discussion • Comparison with previous studies • Conclusion • Acknowledgements • References Laboratory reports Aim ^ Orientation ^ {materials^ procedures} Observations and Results (tables + calculations) ^ Discussion - exploration
horizontal Discipline and program specific genre pathways: Academic genres in a linguistics degree Article review / critique Research report Factorial explanation Practical report
1.2: Understandings of academic genres adapted from Martin J R & P Peters (1985)
Structure of an Interpretation • An Interpretation achieves its goal through stages of: • 1. Research Context • 2. Results/Discussion • 3. Conclusion
1.3: designing genre pathways across a program Multiple perspectives (+ pedagogy + evaluation) Interpretation Comparative (multiple texts) ALL EdLing Multiple perspectives (+ discourse semantics and genre) InterpretationComparative (2 texts) G&R FG Interpretation (1 text) Single perspective (lexico-grammar) Spiral of interpretation genres in Masters of Applied Linguistics
1.4: Pathways for developing control of genre (The 3x3: rank/stratal and metafunctional)
Some issues 2 • Modelling • How far can genre take us? • Where does phase ‘fit’ in terms of the concept of stratification? • What mark does a model get?
2.1: How far can genre take us? Remove ‘use’ findings point
2.2: The place of phase in the model genre discourse semantics phase lexicogrammar phonology
Some issues 3 • Joint Construction • How to operationalise a model designed in primary school contexts in an academic literacy environment • How to ‘do’ joint construction online • How and whether to design Joint Construction in terms of macro-generic stages and phases
3.1 Operationalising Joint Construction Sydney School genre pedagogy Rothery & Stenglin 1995
Sydney School Teaching Learning Cycle • guided reading and note-taking • model annotated texts with notes • deconstruction activities • guided reading/note-taking • jointly writing the target genre
Acrobat Connect Professional - white board (for scribing) - notes - chat room (for interacting)
solidarity negotiation power appraisal involvement 3.3: Designing Joint Construction (?) Theoretical home tenor ? Exchange move discourse semantics
Angle (teacher seeks a single and particular contribution from students to get them to produce some text for scribing)
Seine (teacher seeks a variety of options from students - good for helping students to avoid plagiarism!)
Reserve (teacher wants to keep the student’s contribution for later use)
Mould (clause constituent level - Theme/Rheme) (teacher amends the student’s contribution)
Mould (grammatical error) (teacher amends the student’s contribution)
Metapraise (teacher reflects on language choices)
prompt MEDIATION network +Lead fish - +Angle net - +Seine; Angle Seine - value +Metappraise manoeuvre - hold +Reserve - revise +Mould -
prompt +Lead fish - +Angle net - +Seine; Angle Seine - value +Metappraise manoeuvre - hold +Reserve - revise +Mould -
... and thus three systems of discourse semantic valeur related by constituency... MEDIATION NEGOTIATION SPEECH FUNCTION