1 / 17

Components of a Learning Health Care System

Components of a Learning Health Care System. Denis A. Cortese, MD BPC Health Care Reform Event April 24, 2008. Learning organizations. Value*. Individ- ualized Medicine. Science of Health Care Delivery. Integration and coordination. Pay for value.

wyman
Download Presentation

Components of a Learning Health Care System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Componentsof a Learning Health Care System Denis A. Cortese, MD BPC Health Care Reform EventApril 24, 2008

  2. Learning organizations Value* Individ-ualizedMedicine Scienceof HealthCare Delivery Integration and coordination Pay for value *Value = Quality/Cost = Outcomes, Safety, Service/Cost Over Time

  3. Quality Value = Cost over a span of care Pay for Value • Pay for results, outcomes, value,not process compliance • Purpose for process is to achievebetter value (outcomes, safety, service)

  4. Innovation (New Idea, Old Idea,New Way) NewClinicalPractice BasicResearch TranslationalResearch ClinicalPractice Value Translational Education Increasing Value in Health Care Time, people and capital 4

  5. Value Individualized Medicine Science of Health Care Delivery Integration Increasing Value in Health Care Innovation (New Idea, Old Idea,New Way) NewClinicalPractice BasicResearch TranslationalResearch ClinicalPractice Enterprise Learning System Enterprise Learning System Time, people and capital Translational Education 5

  6. Learning organizations Value* Individ-ualizedMedicine Scienceof HealthCare Delivery Integration and coordination Insurance for all Pay for value *Value = Quality/Cost = Outcomes, Safety, Service/Cost Over Time

  7. Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center Goal Influence stakeholders to implementsubstantive health care reform before 2011that will enhance quality and availabilityof health care for all patients Role Convening body

  8. Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center • 10 sectors • 800 people • 400 patient comments – 9-city tour • 1000 patients surveyed

  9. MCHPC Cornerstones Coordinated care Value Payment reform Insurancefor all: FEHBP model

  10. Health Policy Center Action Steps:Public Sector • Insurance for all • Ensure/mandate insurance coverage for all • Interoperable EMR • Require all providers to have interoperable EMRs withina certain time (5 years) with patient accessibility • Federal Health Board/Reserve • Implement an independent board to set rules/standardsto promote value in health care • Care coordination • Reward care coordination • Pay for value • Direct Medicare to pay for value/outcomes/preventionusing innovative payment models

  11. Insurance for All • FEHBP – Model • All people own insurance; All participate • Employers can purchase all or some • Government help finance in sliding scale • All insurers take All patients • No pre-existing condition exclusions • Adjust for initial conditions • Sunset Medicare and Medicaid

  12. If Medicare Continues…Mayo Clinic Calls for Major Changes: • Congress must be out as BOD • Stop price controls in exchange for provider pricing transparency on a set of common visits/procedures/tests and quality • Pay for value • Focus on results ▫ O,S,S, and Cost over span of care • UHC ▫ Dartmouth Atlas ▫ NQF ▫ Leapfrog ▫ AHRQ • Let patients pay more if they chose • Coverage with evidence development • Allow comparative effectiveness considerationsin benefit design and coverage decisions

  13. Pay For Value: Concepts • FFS with reward for good outcomes • FFS with shared savings • Shared decision making • Episode based payments • Chronic disease coordinator payment

  14. Role for President • Learning Organization • Value: O,S,S, / Cost over Time • Insurance for all • Pay for value

  15. WI ME MN UT SD ND NE NH CO HI CT IA VT MA MD NJ ID VA TX FL OK MS AR LA Medicare Spending** and Quality of Care* Best quality – Lowest cost Quality score Lowest quality – Highest cost Medicare personal health care spending per enrollee *Quality from “National Health Quality Report, 2006” by AHRQ **Cost from Medicare Health Expenditures by State 2004, CMS website (www.cms.hhs.gov)

  16. 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Teaching Hospital Variability in Value B A GoodEffectiveness GoodEfficiency GoodEffectiveness PoorEfficiency Reward Case mixadjustedmortality(>1 is better) PoorEffectiveness GoodEfficiency PoorEffectiveness PoorEfficiency Incentto moveto upper left C D Cost in last 6 months of life ($000s)

More Related