200 likes | 378 Views
“ Lessons learned ” regarding Michigan ’ s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman OSEP Director’s Conference July 16, 2007. www.cenmi.org/miblsi. A logic for linking Behavior and Literacy Supports.
E N D
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman OSEP Director’s Conference July 16, 2007 www.cenmi.org/miblsi
A logic for linking Behavior and Literacy Supports • Improving the social behavior of students results in: • More minutes spent in academic instruction • Better acquisition during engaged minutes • High quality instruction engages students, and leads to reduction in problem behavior. • Children who fall behind academically will be more likely to: • A) Find academic work aversive • B) Find escape-maintained problem behaviors reinforced
State Support ISD/RESA/ DISTRICT Team School School School MiBLSi Support Structure National Initiatives Connection Funding/ Professional Development Reading/ Discipline Information
Prerequisites for MiBLSi Implementation • Commitment by… • 80% of building staff • Administration at building and district levels • Agreement to implement for at least two years • Reading/Behavior one of top three building goals • Building team and coach identified
MiBLSi is NOT for… It takes work, commitment and courage!
Criteria on Team Implementation Checklist and Effect on Student Behavior
Building Leadership Team Represents School improvement team or connected to school improvement team Example: Principal, Lower elementary teacher, Upper elementary teacher, Coach) District Leadership Team Example: District MiBLSi coordinator, Student services director, curriculum director, mental health State Leadership Team Director- Special Education and Early Intervention Services Director- School Improvement Parent/Advocate Senior Executive Director- Educational Assessment and Accountability Deputy Director- Special Education and Early Intervention Services Director Michigan Reading First President- State Board of Education Board Member- State Board of Education Leadership Teams
Outcomes Measures Behavior Major Discipline Referrals Suspensions/Expulsions Reading DIBELS/CBM High Stakes Test (MEAP) Process Measures Behavior Team Implementation Checklist Self-Assessment Survey Schoolwide Evaluation Tool Reading Team Checklist Planning and Evaluation Tool for Effective Schoolwide Reading Programs Focus on outcomes, integrity of implementation and problem solving
Coaching Support • Use of existing professionals who typically provide technical assistance at the student level (e.g., school psych, social worker, teacher consultant, reading specialist) • Important to change from expert “doing for” to facilitator “doing with” • Coaches meet with teams at least once/month in addition to team training session • Coaches meet additional 4 days per year • Additional coaching support strategies • Phone conferences with coaches prior to training session • Principal and Coaches meet one hour prior to training session or meeting outside of team training • Coaches have supporting webpage
Example of the Impact of Coaching on Student Outcomes:Average Major Discipline Referrals per Day per Month Coach returns from leave
How do we do this in our school? • Use existing teams/committees as much as possible • Embed project activities into current initiatives (i.e., school improvement, safe schools, character education, etc.) • Establish three levels of implementation, each with different functions • School-wide • Grade level • Individual student
Major Discipline Referrals per 100 Students per Year (Schools implementing > 80% on Team Implementation Checklist)
Percent of Students (Schoolwide) at DIBELS Benchmark level by Cohort Schools
Example School A Example School A
High Stakes Test Reading Results: Michigan Educational Assessment Program Began Implementation Fall 2001 Example School A
As the magnitude of the problem increases…. The need to enhance environmental structures increases The frequency for collecting and acting upon information increases The required resources to address the problem increases Core Support Program: Provided to all, intended to reach most. Continuum of Supports
“Work in Progress” • Technical Assistance Partners • Increased PD individualization based on regional need • Increased Technical Assistance and Support for the region • Competence-based progress through phases of implementation • Adding more schools, focus on district implementation with elementary, middle and high schools
I spend more time visiting and assisting teachers in the classrooms than I ever have because I spend much less time on discipline issues. Because we have more time, we have been able to re-structure our day to incorporate more time to teach reading. Sherryl Martin, Principal Riverton Elementary, Ludington