1 / 28

Shoreline model - GENESIS

Shoreline model - GENESIS. Chang Hsien Kuo. 國立交通大學土木工程學系 中華民國 102 年 5 月 16 日. One-Line model. Bathymetric change: 2-D. Constant shape: (Dean Profile) . Shoreline change: 1-D (One-Line). One-Line model.

wynn
Download Presentation

Shoreline model - GENESIS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shoreline model - GENESIS Chang HsienKuo 國立交通大學土木工程學系 中華民國102年5月16日

  2. One-Line model Bathymetric change: 2-D Constant shape: (Dean Profile) Shoreline change: 1-D (One-Line)

  3. One-Line model Hanson and Kraus (1989) – Generalized model for simulating shoreline change, GENESIS Variation of longshore sediment transport Constant beach profile

  4. One-Line model Hanson and Kraus (1989) – Generalized model for simulating shoreline change, GENESIS D=Db (tidal variation)+Dc (closure depth)=total depth Q(x) : longshore sediment transport q : sand source or sink

  5. GENESIS model longshore sediment transport SPM (1984), W:Numerical factor Ozasa and Bramton, 1980: longshore gradient in wave height ~0.5 >> breaking waves predicted

  6. GENESIS model Flow chart Positions of some shorelines of different years Setting parameters required Model Calibration for K1 and K2 Prediction of futhure shoreline change

  7. GENESIS model Example: I-Lan shoreline

  8. GENESIS model Specified parameters Model Calibration

  9. GENESIS model Model verification and prediction

  10. Scales of modeling approach and users of GENESIS More than 1000

  11. Discussion on GENESIS model JCR, 1997 Offshore waves: regular wave or observed/calculated waves , H(t), T(t), θ(t) Engineering Structures and activities Ex: Beach profile; Gated boundary of structures : tip of the structure

  12. Discussion on GENESIS model • Limitations: • Inadequacy of data: waves • Closure depth • Permeability factor, transmission factors for detached breakwaters • Boundary conditions: later BC or end BC • Rigorous calibration and verifications: numbers of shorelines

  13. Discussion on GENESIS model • Restrictions • Predictive reliability • Not applicable to simulating randomly fluctuating beach (e.g. Strom-induced cross-shore sediment) • Experience (trained individuals): complexity of beach processes. • Potential errors also are involved in the hindcast of incident waves • Tools that can be misused and incorrect results are • misinterpreted.

  14. Discussion on GENESIS model Advices for users It should be kept in mind that the assumptions are idealizations of complex processes and therefore have limitations In light of profound variability of coastal processes, it is clear that a single answer obtained with a deterministic simulation model must be viewed as a represnetative result that has smoothed over a large number of unknown and highly variable conditions.

  15. Modification on GENESIS model This paper reviews the 25-plus year history of significant developments of the GENESIS shoreline response model

  16. Modification on GENESIS model 1. Jetties and groins (sand bypassing and sand transmission)

  17. Modification on GENESIS model 2. Detached breakwaters and Wave transmission (Kt)

  18. Modification on GENESIS model 3. Cross-shore variation Shields Numbers : Nondimenional falling velocity

  19. Modification on GENESIS model 4. Sediment transport by tidal (longshore)currents Bayram et al. (2006)

  20. Modification on GENESIS model 5. Regional depth contour an open coast without structure or sources or sinks of sediment will evolve to a straight line if a standard shoreline response model is run a sufficiently long time. This limitation can be remedied by specifying a fixed representative contour which is appended to the feed-back contour associated with local changes in the shoreline.

  21. Modification on GENESIS model 6. Interaction between beach berm and dune Davidson-Arnott et al. (2005): sand transport to the dune is related to the width of the berm up to some distance over which equlibrium conditions have developed between the wind and the sand surface. Larson (2004): The erosion rate due to dune impacted by waves’ run-up

  22. Recent study - I The ability to robustly predict future shoreline position under the influence of changing waves and sea-level rise is a key challenge to scientists and engineers alike. This contribution outlines from 1 to 10 years at wo distinct beach types: a storm-dominant site and the second exhibiting a large seasonal variability.

  23. Recent study - I Four cross-shore profile models Ω : non-dimensional falling velocity (H/wT)

  24. Recent study - I

  25. Recent study - I

  26. Recent study - I Impact of temporal sampling (dt:day) < 30days

  27. Recent study - I Calibration length vs. model hindcast for seasonally-dominated field

  28. Recent study - I • The design of coastal monitoring program must consider both the type of beach and the resources available.

More Related