1 / 32

WELS Scheme Independent Review

WELS Scheme Independent Review. Background. WELS scheme commenced in 2005 s76 of WELS Act 2005 requires an independent review after 5 years Dr Chris Guest appointed in Nov 2009 to undertake the review. Terms of Reference. Independent Review terms of reference included consideration of:

wynona
Download Presentation

WELS Scheme Independent Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WELS Scheme Independent Review

  2. Background • WELS scheme commenced in 2005 • s76 of WELS Act 2005 requires an independent review after 5 years • Dr Chris Guest appointed in Nov 2009 to undertake the review

  3. Terms of Reference • Independent Review terms of reference included consideration of: • Appropriateness, efficiency and effectiveness of scheme to date • Opportunities for improvement • Terms of reference also required stakeholder consultation

  4. Review Process • Commenced in Dec 2009 • Concluded June 2010 • Stakeholder consultation included: • 53 stakeholder meetings Feb & Mar 2009 • Discussion paper and call for written submissions in Apr & May 2009 • 28 submissions received • 4 additional roundtable meetings in Apr 2009

  5. Review Findings • A good public policy • Strong stakeholder support • Scheme’s objectives continue to be appropriate • National scope is appropriate and efficient

  6. Review Findings • Scheme provides considerable benefits to a broad range of stakeholders including consumers, industry, utilities and governments • Scheme used across all states and territories in programs and regulations, and by water utilities in supply plans • A similar initiative to WELS would be needed if the scheme didn’t exist

  7. Review Findings • Four significant issues require attention to improve the delivery of the WELS scheme: • Governance • WELSAC and Ministerial Council • Stakeholder engagement • Compliance • Civil offences/sanctions needed • Offences should be recast • Increase checktesting

  8. Review Findings • Administration • Appropriateness of arrangements with E3 program and WaterMark certification scheme • Level and source of funding • Scheme under resourced • Current model / funding strategy inappropriate • Review makes recommendations across 12 areas

  9. Summary of Recommendations • Governance: • WELSAC develop 3-year strategic plans and budgets for Ministerial Council approval • Decision making within 3-year plans delegated to WELSAC • WELSAC renamed WELS Officials Group and level of representation increased

  10. Summary of Recommendations 1. Governance continued: • Establish WELS Stakeholder Advisory Group: • WELSAG to comment on 3-year strategic plans • WELSAG members invited by Minister

  11. Summary of Recommendations • Objects of Act: • Review recommended no changes be made to the objects of the Act at this time

  12. Summary of Recommendations • WELS Standards: • Retain Standards Australia process • WELS Regulator more actively manage Standards Australia processes • Further grandfathering provisions

  13. Summary of Recommendations • The WELS Regulator: • Merge administration of WELS whitegoods products with E3 scheme administration • Transfer administration of WELS plumbing products to body responsible for WaterMark certification

  14. Summary of Recommendations • Registration: • Limit family of models provision to cosmetic variants • New registration required for re-branded models • Remove gazettal requirement for new registrations • Annual notices to verify registration data and remove 5-year registration renewal requirement • Remove provision for voluntary registration

  15. Summary of Recommendations • Labelling: • Consistent labelling showing: • Brand • Model name and number • WELS registration number • Star rating and water efficiency

  16. Summary of Recommendations • Compliance: • Civil and criminal • New / additional sanctions • Apologies • Corrections • Suspensions and deregistration • Recalling • Compensation

  17. Summary of Recommendations • Compliance continued: • Recasting of offence provisions • Cooperative agreement with ACCC • Increased checktesting • Advertising information not required

  18. Summary of Recommendations • Communications: • Adopt a range of new communication activities including training programs for retail sales staff

  19. Summary of Recommendations • Product expansion and minimum WES: • Undertake CBA on removing ratings and substituting with minimum WES on plumbing products

  20. Summary of Recommendations • Cost Recovery: • Cost recovery limited to costs of registration • Governments contribute funds needed to meet the gap between registration income and scheme costs

  21. Summary of Recommendations • NZ WELS Scheme and TTMRA: • WELSAC monitor the impact on Australian market of the NZ WELS scheme

  22. Summary of Recommendations • Relationship to other schemes: • Single web portal for WELS, WaterMark, and Smart-Approved WaterMark (SAWM) • MOU between WELS and SAWM

  23. Next Steps • Release of independent review report • Release of initial response for consultation • Staged process for developing / implementing a final response • Target – new arrangements in place by 1 July 2012

  24. Initial Response • Not final – dependent on further consideration and consultation • Indicative responses – 3 categories: • Agreement expected (Cat 1) • Agreement likely but issues to finalise (Cat 2) • Noted: open position with further detailed work required (Cat 3)

  25. Overview: Initial Response Categories 1 & 2 • Governance: mostly category 1 • WELS Standards: categories 1 and 2 • Compliance: mostly category 2

  26. Other Category 1 • Other areas of mostly category 1: • Objects of Act • Communications • Product expansion and minimum WES • NZ WELS scheme

  27. Other Category 2 • Other areas of mostly category 2: • Relation to other schemes • Single web portal • MOU with SAWM

  28. Overview: Initial Response Category 3 • WELS Administration (E3, WaterMark) • Registration (family of models, re-branding, voluntary registrations) • Labelling (full information / details) • Cost recovery

  29. Process Ahead: Action Plan • Next 2 – 3 months: • Receive and consider initial feedback • Progress initial category 1 positions • Commence detailed evaluation of contestable positions – especially funding and registration

  30. Process Ahead: Action Plan • 4 - 6 months: • Progress update to partners and stakeholders • Consult on detailed evaluations / options • May 2011 EPHC: Update joint governments’ position, including at least in-principle agreements to contestable positions and commence statutory processes • Establish WELSAG • Advance strategic plan development

  31. Process Ahead: Action Plan • 2011-2012: • Consult on and progress required statutory processes and draft legislation • Nov 2011 EPHC: • Finalise 3-year strategic plan • Finalise outstanding policies • Finalise legislation / legislation instruments.

  32. Questions? Thank You

More Related